09 Sep, 2010
NZE Office Bldg - Electrical
And the "about" paragraphs at the end:
Weifield Group Contracting is a full-service, privately held electrical contracting firm that holds a vast portfolio of experience in the mid-western and western electrical business region. At Weifield Group, we pride ourselves on our attention to detail and our ability to deliver the highest levels of customer satisfaction. Whatever your need –electrical remodeling, new construction, maintenance for wholesale, retail, telecom, non-profit businesses, and industrial – Weifield Group can help.
Weifield Group, which is self-certified with the Small Business Administration (SBA), is active in the Independent Electrical Contractors (IEC), Association of Prevailing Wage Contractors, The American Society of Professional Estimators (ASPE), Design-Build Institute of America (DBIA), and the Constructors & Designers Alliance (CDA).
We are confident our substantial experience, communication, innovative ideas, and cost-effective approach will deliver significant value to your critical project.
09 Sep, 2010
Helix
Helix Electric . . . . has 311 employees and was established in 2011. It has local annual sales of $74.5M and its top local executive is Victor Fuchs, president.
09 Sep, 2010
The Davis Family of Urbana, IL
Scot Davis said that as a boy, he often went to job sites and pulled wire for his dad.
"Ultimately, I wanted to be a contractor like my dad," he said. Like Tom, he went through the union apprenticeship program and became an electrician. In 1998, he became president of the company.
Scot Davis said he likes working with clients on projects and particularly being asked back for work. He also likes "the competitive nature" of the business.
Among the company's recent projects: the I Hotel and Houlihan's restaurant, the Gregory Place buildings on campus, the Forum at Carle, the Amdocs buildings on Fox Drive, One Main Plaza in downtown Champaign and the Patterson Companies building west of Champaign.
Carmen Davis Kirby, vice president of Davis Electric, began doing office work for the company at age 15 and continued to work there through high school and college.
Both Scot and Carmen have other business ventures. Scot Davis is a co-owner of Davis-Houk Inc., which does plumbing and mechanical work and employs about 60. Carmen Davis Kirby is an owner of the Bella Mia and Bella Bambini, south Champaign boutiques for women and children, which she said allow her to express her "creative side." As for Tom Davis, he devotes his extra time to restoring Cushman motor scooters. He figures he has restored close to 100 of them.
Tom Davis, the company's founder, is 74.
07 Sep, 2010
Lightwave Solar Electric
Just a couple of the questions/answers:
How are your sales and what's the outlook for the coming year?
What changes do you see coming in the solar installation business?
(More)
30 Aug, 2010
Network Controls & Electric
30 Aug, 2010
Bergelectric - E-biz
“Once we made the decision to work with Airclic – it clicked, and I don’t know why we didn’t invest in a mobile solution sooner,” said Robert Shaw, Vice President of Human Resources for Bergelectric. “Human resource managers are wasting time and money if they are not leveraging the real time data that mobile solutions can deliver. We are eager to see where else within our company that we could utilize this technology.”
24 Aug, 2010
Tough To Buy Contractors Right Now?
O'Connell's last two acquisitions, in 2007 and 2003, deepened the electrical contractor's renewable energy division with companies that specialized in solar and wind energy.
Today, despite more opportunities in the marketplace, O'Connell's strong financial position and its desire to expand, the company is not necessarily going to find the right business and the right terms to make a good deal, CEO Victor Salerno said.
The Victor company, which is looking at opening an office in Albany to serve an expanding customer base, recently evaluated a local contractor as an acquisition, but the price, Salerno said, did not make sense. O'Connell walked away from the deal and instead may focus on growing organically.
Salerno said he has not seen prices come down yet, except in extreme circumstances.
"Usually, where you get your opportunity is when something happens to the ownership or the company has fallen on tough times," he said.
24 Aug, 2010
JSE Closes Down
23 Aug, 2010
Chesapeake Electric Systems
NOTE: The story appears on page 118-119 (a spread) of this "NxtBook" presentation of a printed magazine.
20 Aug, 2010
Rosendin Comes East
Rosendin is based in San Jose and is #4 or #5 among U.S. electrical contractors in revenue.
See the release. It includes this claim, from a company VP:
20 Aug, 2010
Top Subcontractors - Texas
Here's the Top 100 Ranking -- four of the top 10 subcontractors are 100% electrical, with Fisk (#6 overall) as the #1 E.C. (with $184M in '09 revenues).
The breakdown by market sectors shows 25 electrical contractors (with sales for each given) -- the largest subgroup broken out.
17 Aug, 2010
Interesting Contract
The fee = $53.9 million.
What's the job?
" . . . provide electrical crews and material required for limited electrical inspection and repair of U.S.-occupied camps, not supported by the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program, in diverse areas in Afghanistan."
The verbiage, which is limited in detail, notes that Inglett & Stubbs "will field 60 licensed electricians" and that the firm will "correct immediate life, health, and safety issues."
EleBlog is tempted to link this to the electrocution deaths of U.S. military personnel in showers. It's not clear whether that is what this is.
17 Aug, 2010
Top Subcontractors -- Northwest
The verbiage began with this ominous sentence: The top 10 firms saw their revenue drop from 2008’s record $1.9 billion to just $1.45 billion in 2009.
Find the Top 50 ranking (all trades) here. There are electrical contractors at #4, #7, #9 (EMCOR), and #10.
Rankings by state (AK, OR, WA) are here.
Most interesting, probably, will be the rankings by specialty. There are 10 electrical contractors listed, with their revenue, including EMCOR, Rosendin, and IEC Commercial.
16 Aug, 2010
Interstate Celebrates #44
16 Aug, 2010
O'Connell is #43
See the Democrat and Chronicle article here, which is about O'Connell (not about the ranking). NOTE: The article is spread across 4 web pages.
It's a Q-and-A with Victor Salerno, CEO of O'Connell Electric. Something from Vic:
16 Aug, 2010
Gaylor Electric - Helping Out
Gaylor, an electrical contracting company, has done a lot of work on the renovation/expansion of Monroe Primary Center. This is a way to give back to the school corporation because "they're good people to work with," Reynolds says.
09 Aug, 2010
EMCOR Group - A Buy?
I'm also not certain why anyone would buy the stock of a company in the construction industry. It's an up-and-down biz. Wall Street does not like "lumpy" -- and has proven it, time after time, by kicking the living bejesus out of stocks of companies in construction.
I'm also very sure I would like to buy the stock of a company that paid a dividend. The mere fact that the company is able to mail checks every quarter tells you that the numbers on the corporate balance sheet are not total lies.
ADDITIONALLY, I can't do what I'm advocating here. I write about EMCOR Group. I write about other contractors. I refuse to buy the stock of EMCOR because it is, rather obviously, a HUGE conflict of interest.
However, were I you, and were I interested in buying stock, and were I willing to overlook the construction thing and the lack of a dividend, I might want to investigate EME stock.
- - - - -
Here's a 5-year chart of EME's performance vs. the S&P 500. Like what you see?

And here's a 1-year chart of EME's performance vs. the S&P 500.
[Charts above created by me at http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/]
EME's recent (Q2) report can be read here. You can listen to the webcast of the Q2 phone "meeting" with analysts, here.
- - - - -
You might well decide that the company is richly valued right now, at a price of $26 and with anticipated earnings per share this year of less than $1.80. I could NOT argue. However, this is a well-managed company with relatively low levels of long-term owings. It is "diversified" to the extent it incorporates within it an electrical contracting operation, a mechanical contracting op, and a facilities service company.
Maybe you don't want to buy it now (I do! but I won't). You might want to put it down as a stock to follow, see how well it does the next time the stock market suffers a big downturn - and buy some then.
(More)
04 Aug, 2010
Solar - And Fischbach & Moore
Something happened in the past 30+ years. The company fell upon unique times, dissolved into pieces, was acquired. Some of it disappeared. Last I heard, at least a piece of it had been acquired by the big Boston EC, Sullivan & McLaughlin.
Well, I came across a release from the solar module supplier SOLON on a 1-mW solar PV project in Haverhill, MA. The wording included this:
Rivermoor is the home of some money people.
What about F&M, the electrical contractor? It has a website, too. The "History" page is interesting reading, and notes the 2005 acquisition by Sully Mac.
04 Aug, 2010
Q&A With IES's Boss
I can't afford to subscribe to TWST, but I have purchased individual copies of the thing from time to time. It's an amazing publication, well worth the money . . . if you've got it. Anyway, a TWST release shares a bit of what Caliel had to say:
As you well know, the residential and homebuilding markets have been under a lot of pressure for the last two years or so, and as a result of that, we've expanded our homeowner offering to help us deal with the downturn in new home construction - namely things like standby power systems. For example, in areas where frequent loss of power, we market, design and install a standby power offering, so your home will have a standby generator there ready to go if the power goes out. That's an add-on offering that we're taking to the market. Also with the renewable energy markets and solar federal tax credits, we have developed a residential solar installation offering. We work with both homeowners and large builders to install residential solar power-generating systems.
To see the rest of this, you'll have to see the release; there's probably significantly more in the publication itself (you can buy single copies).- - - - -
NOTE ALSO: I interviewed Caliel at the Wind show back in May. The two-part Special Report (which I kinda called "wrestling with an octopus") that resulted posted here -- Part One and Part Two.
29 Jul, 2010
Rosendin - 9.4 mW Solar Project
When done, the company -- which is the 4th or 5th-largest EC in the U.S. -- will have installed about 20 mW of solar power over 18 months in the state.
29 Jul, 2010
A Best Place to Work - MS
"The largest structured cabling company in Mississippi, BCI provides software, hardware, network products and services, IP and traditional phone systems, security, and wireless and storage services." The company is, it says, "one of only four companies worldwide that have achieved" Gold Partner status with Cisco Systems.
Founder: Tony Bailey. Employees: 150.
HQ in Madison County, MS, with offices in Little Rock and Birmingham.
2nd place in the medium-sized category in the Journal's 2010 "best places" contest.
26 Jul, 2010
Waste/Scrap + The Economy
That's why I was interested to read in the 7/13/10 issue of the monthly Rail Time Indicators -- from the Association of American Railroads -- about the correlation between waste + scrap rail traffic and quarterly GDP growth.
Now, thinking about it without the data (which follows), IT MAKES SENSE. Our American system is set up so that, if we're building a lot, if we're buying a lot, and if we're moving a lot of stuff around ....all the conditions of a return to booming business, in other words....... we'll generate a LOT of waste and scrap.
Here are the correlations between commodity carloads and quarterly GDP growth, going by the past 10 years (Q1/2000 to Q1/2010), according to AAR (using GDP data from the BEA):
Petroleum products = 82%
Waste + Scrap = 79%
Stone, clay & glass products = 79%
Primary metal products = 77%
In other words, Waste + Scrap is right up there!!!
What's the current reading: June 2010 shipments of waste + scrap material were UP 23.3% from 6/09 -- and down 20.8% from 6/08.
26 Jul, 2010
PCE- Spokane To Vegas
The nearly 1,200-word article can be found here (it's on two web pages, so you gotta click thru).
Here's an interesting perspective on things from Thompson:
"You really can't expand in a strong economy," he says. "The people that you need to hire are making really good money and have no interest in taking a risk" by leaving a good position.
"It's not going to get any worse" in Las Vegas, Thompson adds. "That isn't to say we think it's going to get better soon."
Still, he says, "Even in a terrible economy, most businesses need an electrician occasionally. Everybody knows that's a power-driven economy. That four-mile strip has a lot of lights. There's a lot of work that gets done."
25 Jul, 2010
Electrical Contractors Inc
Electrical Contractors Inc. has been named Contractor of the Year by ConocoPhillips' Midcontinent Business Unit.
-- award is for safety "as well as its work on grounded innovation, performance, and relability during 2009."
25 Jul, 2010
1 House = $1M In Controls
In that project, Phoenix installed nearly $1 million worth of controls
on 800 circuits, or switches, in the house. The project included 32
zones for heating and air conditioning, 200 zones for security including
every window and door, 16 security cameras that display in color by day
and infrared by night, and 16 zones of audio/ video.
WOWSER!
21 Jul, 2010
Houston Contractor-Franchisees
25 Jun, 2010
Contractor Acquisitions
Rosendin, one of the 5 largest ECs in the land, said it was going to buy KST Electric of Texas. Now, it says it finished the acquisition.
22 Jun, 2010
Northside Truland (Richmond)
22 Jun, 2010
Doggone Big House
I was on the site of Hunt Electric (www.huntelectric.com) of Utah the other day. I know not-very-much about Hunt, except to note that the website is good, the company IS a TEGG contractor (which to me is a recommendation) . . . and the website is up-to-date. Unlike another contractor site to which I went this past week, where the most recent download on the newsletter page was from 2005, the 4/10 company newsletter was available from Hunt.
Here's something I found about a "dream home" (high-end residential):
With 10 / 200 amp sub-panels, over 650 Iris recessed cans, more than 1000 feet of L.E.D. lighting, 250 plus lighting loads, and a total integration of heating / cooling, audio visual, security and lighting, not to mention 70,000 feet of romex (over 13 miles), many hours of coordination between the different trades, tough parking and delivery conditions, and as many as 60 craftsmen on site at one time, this was quite a task.
You read that right -- 70,000 feet of romex in a house. And 10 load centers. My house has ONE.
21 Jun, 2010
Peck Electric To Be Acquired
Peck Electric's established electrical contracting services division currently employs 60 people with training and experience in all aspects of electrical wiring for commercial, industrial and residential projects as well as control wiring and logic controllers, high voltage power distribution, lighting and 24 hour emergency service. The company is licensed, insured and has been servicing customers since 1972. Peck generated $6 million in gross revenue in 2009 with the majority of sales attributed to its electrical division.
IBM, UPS, Energizer Battery Company, PBM Nutritionals, Ben & Jerry's, Husky Injection Molding, Fletcher Allen Health Care, University of Vermont and Champlain College are among Peck's customers. The company has worked with most major general contractors throughout Vermont. In addition to electrical contracting Peck installs telecommunications systems, provides solar power installations, and designs and develops clean energy products.
19 Jun, 2010
EC Gets Maine Airport Job
To facilitate the project's coordination, planning, and scheduling, construction manager Turner Construction is utilizing a Building Information Modeling (BIM) approach for the facility's mechanical, electrical and plumbing (MEP) engineering services. ESB's commercial division will be utilizing AutoCad Revit MEP 2011 Suite and NavisWorks software, provided by and with technical support from Microdesk of Massachusetts.
Throughout the project, ESB will employ a field crew of 10 IBEW electricians, managed by project manager Joseph Bradley and project superintendent Steve Melanson. At peak construction, the electrical crew is projected to grow to 25.
Bradley said, "The most demanding part of the project will be the phasing and logistics as existing airport operations must be maintained." Adding to the project's logistical complexity is the fact that the facility is built over the existing public access roadway which must be kept passable and safe at all times.
Add to all of that (and more) -- the project is seeking LEED Silver certification.17 Jun, 2010
Weird Web Stuff
Then my eye wandered to the immediate right of the words (I mean, right next to them). It listed (with small pictures) related slide shows). From top to bottom:
2010 Celebrity Deaths
The Tatooed Ladies of Hollywood
When NOT To Hyphenate Your Name (MATURE CONTENT)
Hottest Celebrity Redheads
Weird California Laws
Now, of the 6, I would guess that the one on "Laws" might have something or other to do with a campaign for a Senate seat. But -- is Fiorina dead? Does she have a tatoo? Is there she legendary (or, for that matter, the victim of a hoax?).
In Plain English -- what the HECK does any of that have to do with Carly Fiorina? Or, for that matter -- with anything else?
- - - - -
TO MAKE THIS ITEM A LITTLE MORE USEFUL -- here's a link to the Rex Moore website. I know nothing about the company. The website itself LOOKS pretty good . . . until you go and try to download a newsletter (this is my first stop on the website of any contractor that has a newsletter). The most recent NL that was downloadable was from July . . . 2005.
(More)
11 Jun, 2010
SecurAlarm Systems - Winner
You can see this online only if you're a paid-up subscriber, so I'll retype the relevant stuff from the piece about this co.:
Pat's "hands-on approach to business started in high school at his family's business, Van Haren Electric, which he joined full time after college. Under his leadership, which began in 1972, Van Haren Electric grew to become one of the largest ECs in the area. He gained extensive experience in installation, estimating, purchasing, field leadership, and corporate management."
Then, it says, he sold the company in 1998. Doesn't say who bought it.
27 May, 2010
Wiring Mess
“It was a custom home, and the homeowner was frustrated when he didn’t have a clue what all the wires were in his house,” Livingston says. “He called the low-voltage company that initially wired it, and he ‘fixed it’ but the owner was still frustrated. That messy panel was how it looked the day I got there, after the other guy ‘fixed it.’”
“Fix” would be quite an overstatement for what Livingston saw to be some zip ties and a few labels added to the original wiring - and incorrect labels at that, like the wiring labeled for the master bedroom actually running to the family room.
25 May, 2010
Basics of Solar Installations
A typical job is done by two to three men over two to four days, depending on the size. That includes one day to install the panels, and the remainder to wire the attic and inverter. In total, the average job is 80 man-hours.
There are two other very important partner contractors involved in every one of Erdmann's PV jobs: a roofer and a structural engineer. They are brought to every job to check the roof condition and the orientation of the roof to optimize PV panel placement.
21 May, 2010
Diversified Contractors
"We just had our 20th anniversary," Susan Evans said of M.E. "This is a local event, and we wanted to come out and target our local community."
Sounds like the "aged breaker box" display was a good idea. But I noted that this company, which is probably not huge, is diversified -- regular electrical work PLUS back-up generators PLUS security installs.
18 May, 2010
Contractor At 23
Age then: 23. He's still relatively young, and was named (in the 4/26/10 issue of the pub) as one of the "Top 40 Under 40" in the area.
Robinson began in construction in 1997 (which would make him, what, 17 years old?) as a laborer, "working with crews doing simple electrical wiring."
He runs Robinson Electric (Cleveland, Miss.), which, according to the article, has grown from 25 employees + $3.5M in annual sales to $10M and 65 people. This makes it sound as if he took over a company that pre-existed, but the article isn't all that clear.
Included in the article is a quote from a construction contractor: "I do not know of many individuals Brian's age or, for that matter, even older, who can achieve and handle what this man does."
EleBlog take: I don't know the guy. But this appears to be a case of -- some people have it, and some don't. He apparently does!
14 May, 2010
PayneCrest of St. Loo
However, on 3/26/10, the local business newspaper ran a piece on PayneCrest. Click over. If you don't, here are the highlights:
300 total employees, 2008 rev = $90M
and
14 May, 2010
Speculative Speculation
I noticed the acquirer is a company with stock in public hands, so I went over to Yahoo! Finance (symbol EFIR.OB) to check it out. The stock price is 1 penny, down from one quarter (check out the "historical prices" page).
I don't know if the GA contractor sold out. I hope he/she/it got cash!
14 May, 2010
Underground Work
"To support the fully grounded installation, all distribution cable was placed underground in 42 miles of PVC conduit," Hensley said. "The electrical engineer made the decision to use Schedule 40 PVC glue joint pipe in the specs for the high durability and the wall thickness to be able to handle the friction of the wires being pulled. At just over 2,000 feet, the crane feeders were the longest."
12 May, 2010
MC Dean
Recently, GovConExecutive did a Q-and-A with Bill Dean about the company's role in federal construction, LEED (green), and more. It's worth reading (the whole thing; click away).
Just in case you don't, here are a coupla quotes from the thing:
AND
09 May, 2010
Number 28
09 May, 2010
Mr. Electric Expands - In TX
Of significant interest, I would think, is this paragraph:
A "members-only" plan smells like recurring revenue, a neat idea for the EC biz!
09 May, 2010
Alterman Of San Antonio
03 May, 2010
No Stim $ For Aurora Electric
Veronica Rose, founder and CEO of Aurora Electric, a Jamaica, N.Y., electrical contracting company, has spent nearly 20 years successfully bidding on government contracts. One of the first women to obtain a master electrician's license in a heavily male-dominated industry, Rose has worked on major projects at JFK International Airport and the World Trade Center. Her seven-person firm boasts a customer list that includes General Electric, NBC and Columbia University.
So how much of the
$787 billion in stimulus money that the government approved last year
has ended up in Aurora Electric's bank account?
"We haven't seen any of it," Rose says. "The stimulus money went to the
big infrastructure companies that build highways and bridges--the
bigger, deeper, heavier part of our industry where you have to be a big
company in order to compete."
26 Apr, 2010
Baker + McBride
McBride Electric specializes in planning, implementing and protecting the electrical and voice/data/video infrastructure that is vital to commercial and industrial clients nationwide. Their teams of experts are focused in the areas of Technology/Equipment rollouts, Critical Systems and Energy Conservation. With a proud heritage since 1950, McBride Electric serves more than 40% of the Fortune 100 through a unique combination of 13 regional branch offices and their best-of-breed affiliate organization.
25 Apr, 2010
IAM Unlimited of MI
A disabled-veteran-owned electrical contracting company that specializes in electrical power distribution systems and infrared testing for businesses and government.
23 Apr, 2010
Yolanda Mitchell, Electrical Contractor
But note that it didn't happen overnight:
Though the job was small, it was experience Mitchell could add to FYM Logic’s résumé. The company began landing other commercial clients including the Syracuse City School District and automotive parts manufacturer Johnson Controls Inc. based in Glendale, Wisconsin. FYM Logic’s commercial client base was bolstered even further because of Mitchell’s efforts to strategically align with other contracting firms needing a minority- or woman-owned partner to go after those contracts that have minority contracting requirements.
The result: Approximately 90% of FYM Logic’s business is now commercial.
13 Apr, 2010
Continental Electric Construction
The Witz family has earned this amount of fame -- and more. Read it here.
05 Apr, 2010
Indians Go Green
More here:
http://www.indiancountrytoday.com/national/southwest/72848857.html
26 Mar, 2010
O'Brien Repairs Lamps
and
25 Mar, 2010
Power Line Services Inc
Total Electrical Services & Supply (Midland, Tex.), acquired 12/31/09 and
Air2 LLC (Timonium, MD).
That last company doesn't sound like the first? That's because Air2 provides "helicopter-assisted" services to the electric utility biz.
24 Mar, 2010
TN Electric Expands
In early 2008 the company learned that contractors were having difficulty getting electrical work completed on wind farms out west.
“We contacted them and figured out that we had the skill sets to do what it takes — right here in Kingsport — to get the job done,” Boehling said.
The company was able to secure contracts to wire wind turbines across the Texas panhandle and Missouri.
Most recently, Tennessee Electric was contracted to provide wiring work on wind energy projects in Greensburg, Kansas — a town that was essentially destroyed a few years ago by a tornado, and is now being rebuilt with “green” projects in mind. The wind farms being constructed today will supply the town’s electricity needs tomorrow.
22 Mar, 2010
J & I Electric of Louisville
Denise previously worked "in the insurance industry and I also worked for an electrical supplier," as well as for her dad.
Tom does the estimates, Denise handles "the office end of it."
Standby generators: J & I has been in the standby biz for 6 years, it's a dealer for both Generac + Briggs & Stratton. Most of the article is about the standby biz. Bohn claims that standby generators are, soon, going to be standard equipment for a new house (like central air).
20 Mar, 2010
'Kinetic Energy'
From the company's description of the technology on its website:
It can only change from one form to another, like heat to light, chemical energy to electrical energy, or chemical energy to mechanical motion.
When a moving vehicle slows down, it wastes some of its kinetic energy in the process of braking. If a device is to harvest a vehicle’s kinetic energy, the vehicle must slow down.
A vehicle energy harvester functions as an “external regenerative brake,” by helping a vehicle slow down and thereby capturing and converting a portion of the vehicle’s wasted kinetic energy into useful electricity rather than wasted brake heat.
I can't tell whether or not this is hype. The company has stock in public hands (NENE.OB is the symbol) -- the stock's price has been as high as around $5 per share since it came public in 2007. Right now it's just below 50 cents per share.
15 Mar, 2010
Synergy + Solar
According to the article, the company will do "engineering, installation & testing" of the project (which is funded by stim $). The minimum power production is to be 1,445 kW. This is in sunny California, you know.
I went over to the company's site and found, on the "about" page, this interesting piece of information:
In addition to graduation from San Diego State University, Ms. Keltner became a certified Electrical Management at Arizona State University and Electrical Estimating through NECA Schools. Ms. Keltner sets an example for all Synergy employees. A true believer in education, she represents the best of women in the construction field today.
15 Mar, 2010
Self-Sponsored Contractor Webcast
As for the effectiveness of self-promotion -- well, this made me aware of the company, didn't it?
13 Mar, 2010
Ziegler Electric Service @ 50
Don Z's blood is dyed electrical blue! From Don Ziegler: "My father owned an electrical contracting business in Salina until the early 1940s before moving to Wichita to work as an electrician. I also had two brothers who were electricians in Wichita, so I grew up around the electrical business."
11 Mar, 2010
Burrows Electric Co.
Founded by George Burrows Sr. in 1948.
"Throughout the '50s, '60s, and '70s, Burrows Electric Co. has trained countless young black men eager to learn the electrical trade and provided employment opportunities which allowed them to provide for their families -- particularly at a time when opportunities were not readily available to them."
Management now includes daughter Sonya and son George Jr.
Motto: "Honesty, integrity, and experience have been the cornerstone of our business since its inception, and will continue to be our guide light as we move forward."
I searched for a website and didn't find one. However, I did find this 2008 note on the company:
09 Mar, 2010
E Light Wind + Solar
The other partner is E Light Wind + Solar, a division of E Light Electric Services (Englewood, Colo.).
09 Mar, 2010
EC's Unit Sells Wind Assets
What it doesn't say: EcoEnergy is a division of Morse Group (Freeport, Ill.), home of Morse Electric, a contractor founded in 1944.
09 Mar, 2010
Rosendin Short In ENR
No link? Yes, we have no bananas. Reason: ENR hides its features behind a password after one week online free. So if you wanna see this, it'll be $4.95. I really like Rosendin, but this is a really short (4 paragraphs) thing -- not worth $1.25 per paragraph, folks!
What it said:
"Hawk says the firm is . . . beefing up its attention to bid-estimate reviews and project pre-planning."
From Hawk, again: "We have to have measurables we can track. We're not just telling people to work harder and faster."
09 Mar, 2010
Hall Brothers Of Virginia
The first contracts started in June 2007 and the firm at times employed as many as 100 people to handle the work.
It was stimulus for the region before stimulus became a widely known term.
"For us, in the construction industry, it's been a lifesaver," said Martin, a senior project manager for the Colonial Heights electrical contractor. "We had to hire. We had some of our best years we ever had."
and at the end of the 1,150-word piece --Business was good until last fall when Fort Lee contracts started to dry up and increased competition - from firms as far away as Alaska - took a toll.
"It's going to be a tough year, but there's work out there," he said.
02 Mar, 2010
KenMor Does Service (+ TEGG)
“The best way to sell ourselves on a day-to-day basis is service,” Quebe adds. “Typically, emergencies don’t come until after the job takes place. The service department is our smallest work, but is the most profitable. We feel it’s just as important as any other service we provide.”
See KenMor's website -- and also, if you're unsure of what TEGG is, the TEGG site.25 Feb, 2010
Contractor Portneuf Gets Into WIND
From the Idaho DoC release:
River’s Edge Energy, Inc. has contracted with All Bright International to sell and install wind turbines in all 50 states. They’ve calculated that in 90% of the applications, the payback for the investment is very quick, 2-5 years, with unused power net metered and purchased back by the local utility company.
River’s Edge Energy, Inc. plans to offer a turnkey system in three markets: residential, agriculture and small scale wind farms. They will provide all the necessary resources and information on federal and state tax credits, and access to some of the billions in stimulus funds set aside for the wind industry, net metering, financing resources, and many others to help set up a single small scale wind turbine or multiple turbines.
25 Feb, 2010
How Big Is Leviton?
Relevant here: Some facts about Leviton --
Revenue: "About $1 billion annually." Note from EleBlog: I'll bet it's a lot more than that!
Employees: 7,300, including 450 on Long Island
Locations: Beyond the HQ (a new, green building the company leases) -- another 20 locations in the U.S., China, Dubai, and India.
12 Feb, 2010
EC Goes Fishing (?)
09 Feb, 2010
Interstate Electrical Services Corp.
Read the profile here (it continues onto a 2nd web page). What's most interest to The EleBlog is the kinds of work the company does. It shows the number of different things that come under the heading these days of "Electrical Contracting" . . . in this case, all under one roof, so to speak:
network systems
control systems and
specialty services
AND
AND
09 Feb, 2010
Terry's Electric
Now the family is working its way through the development bust that has left it a muchsmaller operation than it was just a few years ago, though it's still ranked fifth in the state in terms of size, according to Southeast Construction magazine.
The Quigleys had sold the company in 2002 to a Connecticut electric utility that was building a network of contracting and service firms along the East Coast. But as the housing boom turned into a housing bust, the utility refocused, and company founder B. Terence "Terry" Quigley and his wife, Jeanne, reacquired control of their Kissimmee-based operation, which they had continued to manage.
Find the feature (which is distributed across two web pages) on Terry's Electric (Kissimmee, Fla.) here. Note that the story says the company's revenue is down sharply, and the debt the Quigleys took on to buy the thing back. But it doesn't mention how much debt the company owned when it was purchased in 2002. In my experience, numbers of contractors sold the company AND the debt to the roll-up buyers -- and when they bought the thing back, they didn't take the debt back.
OF COURSE, this might not have been the case with Terry's. The family might not have had any debt when they sold in 2002; or they might have taken the debt back with them when they bought the thing back; or they might have kept the debt all of this time.
(More)
26 Jan, 2010
Emard Electric's Solar Project
That's what you're learn in this release submitted by PV Powered, which makes inverters. Emard bought them via WESCO Distribution. Some quotes:
AND
23 Jan, 2010
CA Contractor Comes To Ohio
What's the draw? Utility rebate programs on lighting.
15 Jan, 2010
Quanta Stock Touted By Fortune
The mag just came out with "The Best Stocks in 2010." There are 10 of them -- and Quanta Services is one of them.
I like Quanta. I've spoken with John Colson, The Boss there. I like him. I like the company.
Notes:
a. I won't invest in the company, because I might write about them. I know, it's a dumb rule. Still, it's a rule.
b. Without that rule, I would DEFINITELY buy the stock of Quanta (symbol PWR) --
c. . . . except now that FORTUNE thinks PWR is a buy, I'd . . . definitely, positively, think about changing my mind!
- - - - -
Here's a slice of the FORTUNE bit on Quanta --
But at 19 times forward earnings, the stock trades well below its five-year average of 27 times earnings, since investors still worry that Quanta's work might be delayed even longer. Analysts predict earnings per share will increase by 30% next year.
The long-term future looks even more promising. In addition to grid spending, which the Brattle Group, a research firm, estimates will total $1.5 trillion to $2 trillion between now and 2030, Quanta will prosper as its transmission lines carry electricity from renewable energy projects like wind and solar farms.
Buoyed by the government's stimulus loan guarantee program for renewable projects, Quanta expects such sales to nearly triple to $300 million in 2010.
CEO John Colson also figures Quanta's recent acquisition of Price Gregory, the country's largest gas pipeline builder, will drive profits in two to three years as natural gas in remote shale formations increasingly needs to be moved across the U.S.
"We haven't been as bullish on the natural-gas market as we are today," he says. "That's going to spur growth over the next several years."
14 Jan, 2010
Contractor Provides 'Hiring Guide'
31 Dec, 2009
IES Snapshot
FY08 = $818 million
FY07 = $890 million
FY06 = a blur because the company was reorganized.
FY05 = $842 million
This is just ugly. IES was originally a "roll-up" -- a combination of companies (all of them non-union electrical contractors) put together with the help of a lot of money and a lot of stock. It was the idea of a bunch of high rollers (who, I think, made money). I believe even many of the ECs who sold into IES made money -- a lot of it.
At one time early on (1999), the CEO of IES said that, in five years, the company would have $3 billion in sales. It seemed possible at the time. People in the electrical manufacturing business and electrical distribution (larger distributors) freaked out.
At the time, I wrote a number of columns that said -- Won't Happen. I was, of course, right (funny how you remember and cite the times you got it right, and ignore the times you were so far off-base a grandmother could pick you off). As an example, here's a paragraph from a column posted in April 1999:
That was then. This is NOW.
- - - - -
As of the end of 2009, IES has the following distinguishing characteristics:
1. At $666 million, it still remains the largest pure-play electrical contracting company in which you can invest. Yes, EMCOR is much bigger -- but an investment in EMCOR stock gets you involved in two other businesses (Mechanical contracting and Facilities Services).
2. The company is still being reorganized. If you have read what IES management says about the company, it is still getting a handle on itself. Yes, that shouldn't be the case after 11 years of existence. But it is.
3. IES is not a national company. Many of the original components (significant local electrical contracting companies) were purchased, "rolled up" into IES -- and then disgorged in the 2000s. The company seems to relentless change focus (I don't think that's a good thing, but maybe it will turn out to be one of these days).
Here's what the boss, Michael Caliel, said in the Q4 release:
4. If you compare FY05 with FY09, sales are down almost 21% in the past four years. This does not seem to be a reason to run out and buy stock, does it?
5. According to the company's recent release on Q4 results, the backlog of work has declined in the past year from $337M to $241M (28%). This is not good. Note that this is NOT out of line: EMCOR's backlog declined in the same time from $4.42B to $3.39B, or 23%. Somehow, to the naked eye, $241M looks puny, whereas $3.39B looks . . . well, healthy.
6. On the other hand, there were other EC roll-ups launched in the late 1990s, including -- most notably -- two (Building One Services and GroupMAC) that merged into a damn big one, Encompass Services . . . which went out of business shortly thereafter. So you can debit IES for a number of years of flailing about in the water, or you can credit the company with a big positive = It HAS Survived!
IESC's Q4 release.
31 Dec, 2009
Real Green Thinking (kinda/sorta)
Question for the house: IS IT GREEN?
Here's the Atlantic article's answer:
But to be fair, creating heirlooms is not IKEA’s goal. Nor, despite a lot of self-serving hoopla, is energy conservation: the company boasts of illuminating its stores with low-wattage lightbulbs but positions outlets far from city centers, where taxes are low and commuting costs high—the average IKEA customer drives 50 miles round-trip.
Cleverly, IKEA transfers transport and energy costs onto consumers, who are then handed the additional burden of assembling their purchases. Designed but not crafted, IKEA bookcases and chairs, like most cheap objects, resist involvement: when they break or malfunction, we tend not to fix them. Rather, we buy new ones.
The article includes a quote from an environmental activisit: "IKEA is the least sustainable retailer on the planet."
15 Dec, 2009
David Pinter of Zwicker
On its website, NECA has a recent (11/27/09) article on the role Pinter played in negotiating a Project Labor Agreement in NYC. The article ends with this:
Click on the "burger" link to see the 4-page PDF, which Zwicker has on its website.
12 Dec, 2009
Muth Electric Moves
Facts in the article:
The new HQ will be 50% larger.
From Terry Sabers, vp of Muth: "We're just anticipating growth, and we just need more space."
12 Dec, 2009
Continental Electric Profiled
Here's what the company does, from the article:
Continental recently branded its low voltage division as Continental Technologies using new logos and salesmanship.
Continental’s special projects division (SPD) covers services such as power surveys, energy-saving lighting retrofits, contract-to-service transition, LEED/green initiatives, and service truck deployment.
07 Dec, 2009
The Low Bid (???)
That's the question asked by Jim Slack, Jr., on a blog (it's from Slack & Co., a contractor). He wrote:
Sadly, a truth exists in our industry that is becoming harder and harder to ignore: there are subcontractors who are intentionally submitting incomplete estimates so they will be the lowest price on bid day. They know that being the low bid means they win work. As long as there is a feeling among subcontractors that price is the only factor general contractors consider, the bidding game will continue to be played dishonestly. Not only does this behavior tarnish the integrity of our industry, but it also ultimately hurts projects and owners.
Action
must be taken on both sides of the equation to improve the bidding
process. General contractors must ensure they are comparing scopes of
work when reviewing bids. And subcontractors must remember their
responsibility to be good stewards of the owner’s money—meaning they
must in good faith, present a bid that is complete to the best of their
knowledge.
This was timely when he wrote it (back in April) -- and it's even more appropriate to think about right now.
02 Dec, 2009
Award to Rosendin
29 Nov, 2009
Zacks on Electrical Industry
Hubbell: Price Oct. 12 = $43.00.
Grainger: Price Oct. 12 = $93.14
How about the S&P 500? On 10/12, the close was 1076.19
22 Nov, 2009
On Employees: 'Build 'Em Up'
It’s about human relations. If you treat people well, that goes a long way in them wanting to work harder for you. If you treat them like they’re not important, they’re going to find a way to either make it rough on you or go somewhere else.
As far as making people feel wanted, build them up. Let’s say our purchasing agent works hard and finds materials at a very good market, and we’re able to bring that in at high levels. Then, two months later, we find out that the prices went way up on a material, and since he bought it at a low end, that really gave us an advantage that this was purchased at a lower price.
When you’ve got an employee that’s done things like that, you need to let them know, ‘Hey, great job on that, you’re really thinking ahead and looking for the good of the company.’
You build them up not only with praise, but you also either give them a paid vacation or a couple days off. With the way the economy is right now, these things are going to be tough to do.
22 Nov, 2009
Miller Electric
The story is no longer available online. As of June 2009, sales were off 8% from the 2008 pace. The company does mostly residential work, and most of its employees (according to the article) are electricians with 20 or more years of experience.
Here's the most interesting paragraph, quotes from Ed Gocher: "We took much of the money made in our first years and put it back into the company. We purchased new shirts for the men with the company logo, bought new ladders and tools that help the men perform the work more efficiently, and purchased new vans (all the same color and style), heavy duty, and equipped better, to help our men perform better."
17 Nov, 2009
EMCOR Q3 Comments
Needless to say, it would be an interested read for the EleBlog in any case -- as EMCOR is the home of the largest electrical contracting firm in the U.S. (and the largest mechanical, too).
I've selected two segments to retype and present to you here (I can't offer you a link to the transcript, but see the bottom of this item).
- - - - -
1. Tony Guzzi, president & COO, narrated part of a slide show to start the session off. The info below interested me (a) because it's local to me, and (b) because it may well be emblematic of what a company with EMCOR's capabilities can do:
Notes on these comments:
- you will note that Data Center and Pre-Fab are 2 of the 14 non-elephant, non-site categories on EleBlog.
- I believe when Frank says "Washington" he means D.C. in this reference.
- - - - -
2. Frank T. MacInnis, chairman & CEO, answered a question on backlog (and more)
"I think we can say with finality that we are NOT seeing that in the kind of projects we are best at. Substantial, sophisticated, complicated, time-sensitive, quality sensitive projects requiring both a strong financial statement and surety bonding are what we do. The competition has not increased for that kind of work.
"So to the extent that the ongoing macroeconomic circumstances support the availability for estimating and bidding of projects like that, we will do fine."
FINAL NOTE: A replay of the webcast of EMCOR's Q3 conference call is freely available, along with a PDF of the slides -- here.
28 Oct, 2009
Budd Electric Profile
Some of the stuff that follows could have been written about a lot of the ECs I've met over the years (with the details varying in some directions, of course). That's one of the things that have made the 30 years I've spent (more or less) around these people enjoyable:
Biggest career break: My first big break was having Kyle S. Budd Sr. and Mary Alice Budd as my father and mother. In 1972, I started a four-year electrical apprenticeship program. I worked for Budd Electric with my dad, as an apprentice. After about eight months, I went to work for Fairbairn Electric until 1975. The owners were Jim Fairbairn and Jack Green. Their estimator was Eddie Brinkman. I learned a great deal working with these men.
Business turning point: My father started the business in 1972 and, now at the age of 90, he still comes to the office every day. I have been in the same position since 1978. My father let me make my mistakes and I learned from them. We’ve never had a huge misunderstanding. I attribute that to his good nature. What I learned from my father is the biggest reason Budd Electric is where it is today. My son, Tyler Budd, started working with us as an electrician in 1997. He came into the office as an estimator around 2002 and that has helped a lot.
Business philosophy: Our motto is “Quality Counts.” We try to conduct business and treat customers with integrity, honesty, and to offer quality work. I believe that the only stupid question is the one that is not asked. I want my employees to be successful because their success determines the success of Budd Electric.
There are differences in every story, of course. For example, this oine says Kyle S. Budd Sr. is now 90 and started the business in 1972. That means the elder Kyle Budd started an EC business at the tender age of 53!!!(More)
28 Oct, 2009
Oregon EC Moves - New Building
Though commercial accounts remain the bread-and-butter, Lowry and his crew handle many other kinds of jobs, including residential. His workers are even trained to install computer networks in homes and businesses.
“We’re not stuck in any one thing. We’re pretty versatile,” Lowry said, noting that all his workers are certified in phone and data system installation and maintenance. They keep up on the latest in lighting and security systems as well.
A key to maintaining versatility, Lowry said, is making sure the employees are well trained. Through the years, it’s always been his policy to send his workers to school as needed.
“I try to give them all the schooling and knowledge that they need,” he said. “I’ve always believed that if you don’t know how to do a thing, you don’t try and bluff your way through it. You get the training.”
Having a close-knit, knowledgeable staff is one thing that has helped keep the company healthy. Another is a pledge to integrity, Lowry said.
“The price I tell you is the price that it is,” Lowry said. “I don’t go over, and that truth is what has made the business grow.”
28 Oct, 2009
Museum Job
“Our team utilized everything from mountain climbing gear to the Internet to install the highly detailed electrical, telecommunication, audio and video systems in this unique modern museum,” ECI states. “While much of our work is hidden within the walls, our workmanship will forever remain a part of this historical endeavor, enjoyed by thousands who visit from around the globe.”
28 Oct, 2009
From Electricians To Lighting Magicians
From The Detroit News (10/22) -- serving a place where good news is at a premium:
[Ron] Harwood started Illuminating COncepts in 1981 as an electrical contracting business. Since then, it has virtually exploded into an internationally recognized lighting and 'immersion experience' development company."
and
"Part lighting experts and part magicians, the company came up with a small speaker that fitted nicely into the base of [a lighting fixture[. No one could see it, but everyone could hear the sound it produced."
I hope the link above works; I don't know of The News puts stuff behind a firewall after 14 days (as do some newspapers).
28 Oct, 2009
Things Different In Hawaii
"American Electric . . . is known for its work in industrial plants, government, and military facilities, commerciall buildings, hotels and hospitals. The 63-year-old company plans to offer homeowners some of the same services . . . "
Yes, this relatively large electrical contractor (on a Hawaii scale and, I believe, on a U.S. scale, too) is spreading its wings into RESIDENTIAL. Yes, right now, at what is probably the bottom or near-the-bottom of the market.
15 Oct, 2009
Richards & Truland
On Truland Systems: From Alan Linder, vp operations --
On J.E. Richards: From Joe Richards, president
According to the article, Richards had $79.9M in 2007 sales and $109.9M in 2008.
15 Oct, 2009
Top Electrical Contractors
This is NOT the case for the regional lists of the top subcontractors. There are several Dodge regional magazines (like ENR, published by McGraw-Hill). In the August issues of most of them, they printed local/regional lists of the top subs, including a bunch of ECs in each.
A comprehensive list of these things, with brief descriptions -- and most importantly, links -- appears in a two-part blog I wrote for TEDMAG.com.
Part One.
Part Two.
04 Oct, 2009
Hubbell On Smart Grid
NORD: "Part of the question is, how do you define what is contemplated by The Smart Grid? There isn't a uniform answer.
"Certainly, there is agreement amonst all parties that it has -- the grid is wearing and has reliability issues and, sometimes, just fixing the reliability gets contemplated in The Smart Grid. All the way to the point of "smart" being more of the intelligence leading to some of the industry initiatives like smart metering and more homeowner management and end-user management.
"We survived for a long time without that. Certainly, there is a potential that can exist there. But there's a lot of demands on the industry for investments. So it's a question of where they are going to put those demands and where they are going to put the resources and what impetus there is to do one versus the other. And I think that is part of the uncertainty that currently exists from energy policy and where that might lead. That's the potential that could accelerate it.
"At the same time, we have been talking about big investments and acceleration for a number of years. And the only thing that we caution is that every investment that has any big numbers associated with it is a long-term investment. So it is going to be more ratable and so we tend to think of that as embedded in the normal 3%, 4% growth on an annual basis. It is just the composition of that investment in that growth."
21 Sep, 2009
EMCOR Gets Praised
“This is a bespoke system which enables us to configure the exact requirements of any individual project – from grass management in stadiums to a/c and water systems to HR tools and health services; we even have a concierge service with one project – it’s a totally integrated service.
"Where it gets really exciting though and what’s so special about this project in KSA, is that the entire system is linked into portable devices carried by our staff on the ground, completely eliminating the paper trail in favour of efficiency and accuracy where everything can be eliminated, saving time and costs.”
Note that I provided the link to an article on an EMCOR-ish site, rather than to the original. My computer warned me away from the Gulf Construction site, based on some kind of web disease that site wants to give it.
29 Jul, 2009
IES Stock -- On The Move!!!

Above, find a past-30-days stock-price chart for IESC, the stock of Integrated Electrical Services -- created on www.bigcharts.com. IES is the largest "pure play" electrical contractor (EMCOR Group is bigger, but has other operaitons).
Apparently, IESC has run up by better than 50% in the past month. In the same period, the S&P 500 average is up 5.7%.
What does this mean? I looked for news, and found only that the company will announce quarterly earnings/sales/etc. on Aug. 10. Perhaps someone knows something -- something good?
All else that I know is that Tontine Partners owns a rather big slug of IESC stock -- and has said it might want to get rid of some or all of it. Could that be a catalyst for someone or other thinking there's going to be a takeover?
24 Jul, 2009
EMCOR NY Region $$$
Of interest: EMCOR Group's electrical sales in the area are given as $440 million in 2008. In that company's 2008 annual report, electrical construction revenues are given as $1.7 billion. Therefore, one-fourth (25.88%, to be precise) of EMCOR's electrical revenues came from the NY metro area.
On the mechanical side, it's almost $477M out of $2.475B, or 19.27%.
22 Jul, 2009
IES Exec Talks
Unfortunately for those of us who like things easy, the Q-and-A is spread over 6 web pages of the BF site. To my way of working (and thinking), this makes it very hard to read.
Guba is part of the team put in place by Mike Caliel, the guy in charge these days at IES. Here's a piece of what he had to say about what the group found at the company upon arrival:
I'll give you a summary of what happened. When we started we had 27
fully autonomous business units that had never been integrated; we had
never had an integration strategy, and we had business leaders who
pretty much set their own agendas. We had localized reporting that
resulted in little transparency, so it was very difficult to understand
what was going on in the business.
We had controllers in each of the 27 companies who were backward-looking and who tended to be scorekeepers. There wasn't a lot of capacity for forecasting or understanding KPIs. We had some control weaknesses, and a lot of those resulted from personnel issues and problematic processes and systems.
Finance was historically aligned to local presidents and not to the finance function within IES, yet it had very little in the way of business partnership relationships with these presidents. From a market standpoint, business development was purely localized and opportunistic. So our role was to come in and develop a strategy that could tackle these problems and restructure the company.
Guba provides a lot more detail, of course (4300 words' worth!). Here's what he said in answer to a Q about "change management" issues [I bolded a key sentence at the end] that resulted from the wholesale revamp the new management pursued:
We worked through it openly. We had a high degree of transparency
when we made the decision to eliminate the controller jobs at the local
company levels and consolidate them centrally. There was a whole change
management process to go through to treat people fairly and communicate
what we were going to do and how we were going to operate as people's
roles changed.
Of course not everyone accepted the new direction we were taking, so we parted ways when necessary as amicably as possible. And we were able to actually prove that many of the folks didn't have as much of a stranglehold on the business, markets, and customers as we were led to believe.
20 Jul, 2009
Bogus Baloney
21 Jun, 2009
Power Through The Air
Note that a post in March 2006 here on The EleBlog talked about ambient power harvesting.
04 Jun, 2009
EMCOR Stock Runs Up
So, to avoid temptation (and to appear as pristine as a Vestal Virgin) -- I avoid any appearance of impropriety.
Well, I have to tell you, I am very frustrated about the performance of EMCOR Stock (symbol EME). Take a look:

This is the 3-month chart. The stock has run up from $14-$15 to $23-$24. I did notice that it was down around $15, and I would have bought it at the time. I'm not sure I'd be selling now (hint, hint!) . . . but the run up from $15 to $23 is a 53% move. In three months.
Note that the run-up in the S&P 500 index in that same period is about 35%.
31 Mar, 2009
Stock Performance

I went back to BigCharts and asked it to show me prices over the past 3 months. In that time period, IESC stock has outperformed by turning in a precisely FLAT performance (the stock hasn't moved, net, in three months' time). The S&P 500 is down 15% since the year started; EMCOR is down 30%.
30 Jan, 2009
Stupid Is As Stupid Does
On the Solon corporate home page (the English version, anyway), there's a little slogan:
"Don't leave the planet to the stupid."
05 Jan, 2009
MYR Group Write-Up
MYR's stock symbol is MYRG.
MYR's prospects seem good (even if you don't trouble to read the article), b/c most savvy people think the national grid is going to continue to get a lot of attention and investment. In addition to building out NEW power lines (to bring power from remotely located power plants including Wind and Solar), companies like MYR and Quanta Services (symbol PWR) are going to be very busy for the foreseeable future doing renovations, rehabs, retrofits, and upgrades (pick a word) of the grid.
I learned from reading the article that MYR had recently disgorged the D.W. Close operation. I hadn't been aware of that. If memory serves, MYR bought Close in the late 1990s. So this is a 360-degree turn for that electrical contracting company (a big one, that serves the Pacific Northwest) as well.
14 Dec, 2008
Two IEC Awards To S&S
EleBlog comments:
b. The S&S website is truly unique (and high-quality) for anyone, much less a construction contractor.
c. IEC = Independent Electrical Contractors, Inc., which does NOT sound like it, but is an association. IEC = the association of non-union electrical contractors.
08 Dec, 2008
LAME LED PR
The "nation" referenced is, I kid you not, North Dumpling Island.
Yougottabekiddingme with that name, right?
Yep. And with the release.
30 Nov, 2008
Could GE's Stock Collapse?
However, this article (with the title, "Could Ge Collapse?") is a rational, logical exploration of the very real possibility that this company could have a serious struggle ahead of it.
Wow!
25 Nov, 2008
S&S Electric
17 Nov, 2008
Solar Deal
SolarCity will obtain 100 mW of modules over the next five years from First Solar.
EleBlog take: All of the news isn't necessarily good. FSLR's stock price (according to Yahoo! Finance) closed out trading in the week of May 12 above $300. It poked its head above the $300 level in the first week of July. It closed @ $207 on Sept. 26. Last Friday (11/14) the final trade took place below $117.
04 Nov, 2008
Contracting -- How It Works
A potent combination.
Here's a slice from the recent conference, which printed out @ 14 pages single-spaced -- found here at SeekingAlpha.com:
He went on from there to talk about parts of the world. But that short sentence is the essence of how an electrical contractor SHOULD see his/her/its business.
- - - - -
There was another part that was interesting -- an answer from Tony Guzzi, president.
- - - - -
Incidentally, EMCOR stock (symbol EME) seems like a screaming bargain to me. The company has very little debt and no pressing need to borrow (which is very good right now, isn't it?). It has an established business. It has a big backlog. Very little of its core business (if any) can be moved off-shore. When you talk about "outsourcing" . . . well, EMCOR is in the outsourcing business!
According to Yahoo! Finance, EMCOR closed yesterday at $17.58, about half of its all-time high. At the nine-month mark, the company's earnings were $1.82 per share. It's possible the earnings will be around $2.40/share when the year ends, or thereabouts . . . which means it's trading at a price-earnings ratio of 7x. With almost no debt.
- - - - -
. . . SO WHY DON'T YOU BUY IT, JOE? I have a rule against buying the stock of companies I have to write about. It's a rule I've stuck with. No one imposes it on me, I do it to myself. It's simple common sense -- how can anyone reading anything I write put any credence in what I say if I'm enthusiastic not about a company, or a simple industry trend . . . but my investments?
30 Oct, 2008
Bechtel Transforms IT Ops

Main article ("Google-ization")
Bechtel's guy is in the CIO Hall of Fame.
Bechtel's new benchmarks.
30 Aug, 2008
IES On The Market
We have also experienced increased competition for low end retail work from residential contractors who have been impacted by the housing slowdown. Helping to offset the decline in this group were several significant institutional projects such as university buildings, data centers and health care facilities. Year-to-date revenues for our commercial group were $347 million compared to $340 million in the same period of 2007, an increase of 2%.
Our commercial groups’ gross margin percentage declined to 13.8% in the third quarter from 15.7% a year ago, principally the result of competitive pressures and market conditions. Also one of our business units has recently completed several underperforming legacy projects and another one continues to out flow our margins legacy projects. Year-to-date gross margin in our commercial group was 14.3% compared to 15.5% in the same period last year.
EleBlog note: If you read the transcript in full, or look at the IES Q3 statement, you'll find that there IS a decline in the company's residential operations (in terms of volume), but that gross margins on that end are actually going up.EleBlog take: I've heard the same thing (resi contractors migrating into low-end commercial work and screwing up margins for the established commercial contracdtors) as noted above from a major electrical contractor in the Washington DC metro area, within the past two weeks.
See the IES transcript here.
30 Aug, 2008
EMCOR On Renewables
As you mentioned, we have limited construction capabilities both in Canada and in the Northeast for participation in this area. But I think it’s unlikely that we will take the necessary significant capital expenditures to get further into this market, frankly because our other businesses are so good.
I will say, however, that we have been involved in some very interesting renewables projects involving landfill gases in particular, installation of photovoltaic cells on a large-scale. We were talking about, I don’t know if we ever performed that fuel cell pilot project for [LIPO] that they were talking about for Long Island; maybe not. But in general we’re interested in a broad range of renewable energy projects and have the ability to participate directly. Tony, do you want to talk about that.
But then there's this, from Tony Guzzi, president/CEO:Yes, if you look at a kind of things that we can do, we get involved with solar. Frank talked about some of the work we do with fuel cells. We use it as a solution a lot of times to put in front of customers that want to emphasize more so the green aspect instead of just the strong energy savings aspects of our projects. Biomass boilers, we’ve done some interesting landfill gas projects to usable pipeline gas.
So we are involved in all of it. When you get to wind, we have been on a few wind projects. But it’s an interesting market in that it’s really a couple of things. One is the OEMs are heavily involved. A lot of the value is in the turbine. The second part of the job is it’s a big civil job for all intents and purposes. Transmission is the other piece that comes into play. There are a couple of places we would do that work.
But so far we don’t look at it as a significant construction opportunity per say for our electrical content or even our mechanical content although we do participate in several. But on long-term we are starting to think about what might be the maintenance requirements on those wind farms and how we may participate there.
EleBlog take:
a. I'm not interested in criticizing Frank MacInnis. He's done an amazing job at the helm of EMCOR Group. I've already come to the conclusion that he's a lot smarter about this stuff than I am (and, perhaps, smarter than anyone else in the EC business).
b. There is an implicit deflation here of the electrical contractor's role in wind turbine construction (see 2nd paragraph of Guzzi's comments).
c. I find interesting the idea that EMCOR is looking at the future opportunities in wind farm maintenance.
See EMCOR's Q2 conference call here.
29 Aug, 2008
Ford On SUV Future: DIM
Q: If oil goes down, could we see a shift back to SUVs?
A: I don't think we'll ever see a shift back to where we were before. There may be a small drifting back, but I think this is relatively permanent, because a lot of it is psychology as well. It's not just what the absolute price is.
Once people have been shaken as they have been, even if gasoline comes back down to $3, people are still going to remember paying $4, and they'll be very nervous about resuming their old habits.
This is a permanent shift in the marketplace.
28 Aug, 2008
Coal Facts
Here are paragraphs you might want to read, even if you'd never buy the stock of a coal company:
(and later)
In summary, we are seeing record coal prices, sustained growth in coal demand and an improving competitive advantage for coal over other fuels.
EleBlog take: Didn't you think (from all of the "green" this, global-warming that, and alternative-energy "stuff" out there, that coal-fired electrical power generation was going down? WRONG!!!
EleBlog take: Now, every company ALWAYS puts its best foot forward. But if I read that correctly:
b. In the most recent quarter, "the Australian margin exceeded $43 per ton."
c. It appears that Peabody (stock symbol BTU) is now realizing a gross profit in the most recent quarter (in Australia) that's 80% of the gross sales price of 90 days earlier.
No one (not even the Peabody people) can tell you if demand for coal will be sustained. But it seems like a good bet.
- - - - -
JUST A BIT MORE
By the way, this company sells both "thermal" coal (for generating heat in power plants) and "met" coal (metallurgical coal -- also called "coking" coal -- used in manufacture of iron and steel).
If you're interested, here are a couple of paragraphs from the conf call on "met" coal:
To begin with, the current market conditions are providing great
opportunities for seaborne coal suppliers such as Peabody. And we have
the greatest leverage of the any of the U.S-based companies with over
half of our EBITDA expected to come from our international sales
platform. In our last call, we were just settling met coal agreements
for the contract year that begins in April. I am pleased that the
settlements came in at the expected $300 per metric ton benchmark level
for the highest quality coking coal . . .
And we are seeing met coal sales right now on the spot markets that are fetching $300 plus per ton. This bodes extremely well for the next contracting season. As you'll recall, when went into '08, we had significant excellent legacy contracts that we expected to roll off in '09, which will hopefully double our unpriced position in 2009 from what we had at the beginning of 2008. This has very favorable implications for Peabody.
I don't know if Peabody is a "screaming buy." But coal sure seems to be, and this company seems to have its arms around the trend. As my investment guru, Bill Fleckenstein, says -- the difference between a great company and a great investment is The Price (at which you can buy in).I'm planning to do more thinking and watching on BTU -- and if you are looking for an energy investment that's NOT oil, so should you!
(More)
18 Aug, 2008
GE, Appliances - Past & Future
It's about how GE turned its appliance business from a "cow" into a "dog." I heartily agree. Here's a piece of Hutchinson's rant:
General Electric, however from 1981 to 2001 run by ultra-fashionable “Neutron Jack” Welch, epitomized the failings of the era. It under-invested in many of its manufacturing businesses, entered into a blizzard of divestitures designed to boost its short term earnings, played games with its pension accruals and built a gigantic financial services empire of low quality businesses in which it could never be a leader. It also ruthlessly eliminated its middle management and overpaid its top management, winners in the corporate office political game. GE was a much admired operation in Welch’s later years; it is less so now, and if the bloated global financial services business returns to a historically normal size may finally be seen to have been a disaster.
EleBlog take: For a long time now, I have tried to imagine why people "admire" Jack Welch. I've been unable to come up with what they saw (or see now) in the guy. The recent incident (not very long ago, anyway) in which he turned on his successor on CNBC, the financial cable TV station, was revealing, I think.
Welch's "innovations" at the helm of GE included:
b. At the same time, mesmerizing Wall Street. Yes, that's an accomplishment. It's like waving a shiny spoon in the eyes of a 4-month old. Somehow, while the P/E ratios for most financial companies ran at about 11 (before the recent destruction of that sector), GE's was running up at 17.
c. Also, "Neutron Jack" earned that name -- the factories were left in place, the people were . . . made to disappear.
d. Finally, there was the thing Welch did in ranking the company's managers and pressuring (or sacking) the bottom 10%. I always thought that was a gimmick -- and stupid. The bottom 10% in a given operation might be bad or good.
There's nothing to admire in Welch. Not in what he did, not in what he "built," and not in who he is. If you want to credit him with something, see (b) above -- waving a shiny spoon at a 4-month-old (maybe Jack Welch kissed the blarney stone?).
09 Aug, 2008
Green Editorial
We want [our] Green goals to be driven by our people and for the right reasons. Making our environment better is not a marketing scheme or some sort of façade. We are doing this because we truly feel we can make a difference.
Please take a moment to reflect on your role and what a difference you can make, then set some simple goals for yourself and your family. Your contributions will make an impact on our environment and certainly the environment of our children and grandchildren.
Is that some kind of crazy greenie's idea of "the right thing?" No. The writer was Larry Beltramo, executive vice president of Rosendin Electric -- 4th largest electrical contractor in the U.S. (by sales) in 2007.
Read the rest of the Rosendin 5-page green newsletter (a PDF) by clicking here.
04 Jun, 2008
Home Depot Bits & Pieces
Regionally in markets where home prices have declined approximately 15%, we are continuing to see double-digit negative comps. This was reflected in our results in California and in Florida. Even garden, which posted a positive comp for the company reported negative comps in those areas.
Got that? Electrical was down double-digits (along with much else) compared with last year's Q1. The Garden department, although up nationwide, posted a negative comparison to last year's Q1 in CA and FL. This is, at the very least, interesting to think about -- isn't it?- - - - -
Menear continued:
We are also seeing pressure from commodity price inflation and deflation in the market, although pricing for wood products has stabilized, including dimensional lumber and sheet goods, which are now on par with pricing from last year, we continue to see pressure from gypsum deflation.
Copper pricing is up year over year and higher than we had anticipated. Additionally, we are seeing inflationary pressure from petroleum and metals, which is leading to cost pressure.
- - - - -As you'd expect, THD's execs were not entirely negative in this thing (it's a long transcript). Here's a bit from Paul Raines, EVP of U.S. stores:
I actually do not know what a Homer badge is. Before the advent of Homer Simpson, my knowledge of the descriptor "Homer" was for a basketball referee who called fouls repeatedly against the visiting team.
- - - - -
Distributors who compete with THD might be interested in this, from Mark Holifield, SVP supply chain:
If you want to read the whole thing, go here.
03 Jun, 2008
The Price Is Going Up
Steven Gambuzza - Longbow Research
I'd just question on your outlook for operating margin improvement over the balance of the year, you demonstrated the success and were then improving the operating margin with the current flat to down organic sales growth in the first quarter and I guess, I'm just wondering when you look out for the balance of the year, how contingent is your operating margin forecast on your sales growth, the markets soften a little bit more than you anticipated and sales becoming lower, are you able to kind of achieve your targets through internal productivity initiatives, or does lack of fixed cost absorption start to become an issue towards the lower end of your sales range?
Timothy H. Powers - Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
Well,
I would say the biggest variable in the future of our margins has more
to do with the cost price equation and the coming increases in the cost
of steel and the effect of hundred and something teen dollar per barrel
of oil and our ability on the timeliness to recoup that from the
market.
So, like all of us in the electrical business, we're staring
double-digit increases in steel and we have price increases out there
in the markets. So our ability, I have no doubt in our ability to
recoup it.
It's a question of the timing to get back those cost increases with price increases and that probably is a bigger variable than I see in the risk of revenue between now and the end of the year.
EleBlog take: This is what Powers said out loud, with full knowledge that the call was being taped (and that his competitors were listening in). The message he's sending is: THE PRICE IS GOING UP.03 Jun, 2008
Perspective On Housing
To get to the point: I was reading HW's Fiscal Q2 earnings call transcript (find it here), and stumbled over this, from Kirk Benson, chair/CEO. Note that HW doesn't build houses, but supplies stuff (there's a Building Products Segment):
The inventory of new homes for sale has declined. Non-seasonally adjusted units of unsold inventory are now at their lowest levels since July 2005 as builders continue to scale back building activities. However, seasonally adjusted months of inventory reached a new high in March due to a significant slowdown in sales. There are now 11 months of supply based on the current sales pace. Steadily declining inventory levels failed to offset the dramatic slowdown in sales.
So, as expected, we continue to be impacted by the down cycle in new residential construction. In addition, weather in the March 2008 quarter was more superior than the March 2007 quarter, exacerbating the effect of the down cycle. A combination of the residential down cycle and poor weather conditions resulted in a 19% drop in the year-over-year revenue.
Why is this here? This is about HOUSING, not HW.
The point Benson makes in the 2nd paragraph -- "weather in 3/08 was more superior than the 3/07 quarter" . . . something I had not spent much time thinking about. So if housing was down in the 3/08 quarter vs. the 3/07 quarter, that's bad; and then add to the fact that weather was better this year than last over the same time period.
09 Apr, 2008
Local Contractor Makes Good
Here's a link to the 4 quick questions -- which actually aren't that quick (but they are good!). Incidentally, I don't know the Ervines at all. Here are the questions; you'll have to go to the site for the answers:
Is your quote a fixed “bid” for the total contract price, or is it merely a vague “estimate” of what you think my project will cost?
I don’t have time to sit around all day. Will you give me a specific appointment time or do I have to wait during a four-hour window?
I need to get a service panel upgrade. How much do you charge?
I want to add a new light and switch where there is no existing power. What will my walls look like when you are finished?
27 Feb, 2008
What Pike Said
Here's a piece that I thought interesting -- initial comments by Anthony Slater, CFo. The "Eric" he references is Eric Pike, CEO.
Core power line billable hours decreased approximately 14.1% year-over-year, the decline in billable hours was due to the reduction in headcount as a result of exiting certain contracts and the moderation in our customers demand. In addition to increases in storm restoration work which diverted some core power line revenues. Revenue generated in the second quarter of fiscal 2007 from exited accounts totaled $8 million. Excluding revenue from exited accounts, core power line revenue decreased 2.2%. Storm restoration revenues totaled $19.6 million, a 39.3% increase from $14.1 million for the comparable quarter last year.
As Eric mentioned, winter storms in the mid West and mid Atlantic regions drove demand for our storm work in the quarter. Gross profit for the second quarter was $24.5 million or 17.1% of revenue compared to $24.5 million or 16.5% of revenue for the second quarter last year. The 60-basis point year-over-year improvement in gross margins was due to a number of factors. As with previous quarter, gross margins continued to benefit from operational efficiencies as well as the prior elimination of certain lower margin accounts and more favorable pricing which we achieved in the latter part of 2007. In addition, a greater contribution from higher margin storm revenues also contributed to the increase in the quarter.
These factors were partially offset by a $500,000.00 investment in retardant uniform shirts.
EleBlog notes:1 -- Pike didn't do so well in the most recent quarter, whereas Quanta Services had a spectacular 90 days. One difference: Quanta bought InfraSource Services. Also, Pike is smaller.
2 -- Investing in Quanta or Pike (or any other powerline contractor, if any come public) is certainly chancy. Revenues soar when there are destructive hurricanes. No storms = revenue drops. The company managers have to cope with both conditions: Staffing up to meet storm-generated demand isn't easy; ramping things down when no significant storms materialize (as was the case for much of 2007) isn't a simple thing, either.
3 -- Note that last sentence -- the half-a-million-dollar investment in PPE (personal protective equipment).
22 Jan, 2008
IEC 10-K
Geographic diversity —We have 122 locations serving the continental 48 states, and we worked on more than 900 contracts over $250,000 and nearly 3,100 contracts overall in 2007. Our national presence sometimes mitigates much of the region specific economic slowdowns. Since 1997, much of our revenues have been derived from the Sunbelt states, which have had higher growth rates than overall
Utilization of prefabrication processes —Our size and 100% merit shop environment has allowed us to implement best prefabrication practices across our company quickly. We prefabricate and preassemble or prepackage significant portions of electrical installations off-site and ship materials to the installation sites in specific sequences to optimize materials management, improve efficiency and minimize our employees' time on job sites. This is safer, more efficient and more cost effective for both us and our customers.
- - - - -
Industry Overview -- The residential and non-residential construction industries have both experienced strong growth rates for several years. Since the middle of 2007, economic conditions, notably restricted access to credit, have lead to a sharp decrease in demand for residential housing. Reviewing the most recently available data from McGraw Hill Construction Analytics and FMI Construction Outlook, we believe the effects of reduced availability of credit are a significant concern for the construction industry, and we have already experienced a downturn in our residential construction business. Using data from both sources mentioned above, for the period from 2001 to 2006, the five-year compounded annual growth rate for non-residential construction was 3.5%. For the same period, the five-year compounded annual growth rate for residential construction was 9.5%. Fiscal year 2007 forecasts indicate that non-residential construction will increase approximately 8.2% from the previous year; however, residential construction could decline by up to 16%.
Looking forward, the housing market is projected to return to a moderate growth rate. Based on research provided by FMI Construction Outlook and McGraw-Hill Construction, residential construction is expected to continue to grow, but at a modest rate with the projected five-year compounded annual growth rate to be 0.7%. In contrast to the decreased growth in residential construction, growth in non-residential construction is still expected to outpace the economy as a whole. The projected five-year compounded annual growth rate for non-residential construction is approximately 7.3%.
Commercial/Industrial -- Demand for our commercial and industrial services is driven by construction and renovation activity levels, as well as more stringent local and national electrical codes. From fiscal 2003 through 2007, our compound annual growth rate from commercial and industrial revenue has fallen approximately 1.4% per year, due in large part to a more selective strategy focused on higher margin projects. The industry average for non-residential construction services has grown at a compound annual rate of approximately 6.7% per year. Commercial and industrial work represented approximately 62%, 58% and 63% of our consolidated revenues for the twelve month periods ended September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Residential --We are currently one of the largest providers of electrical contracting services to the
27 Nov, 2007
Contrary Opinion
Here at EleBlog, I feel no obligation to post the more-than-one-side (often there are MORE than two!) to every story. However, I just stumbled across a piece posted to SeekingAlpha.com that's FAVORABLE to Home Depot stock.
I am not a great admirer of what's gone on at this company in recent years. As I have written (on TEDMAG.com) -- it looks like a very large moron flailing around, trying to maintain a growth rate that is clearly NOT maintainable.
However, for what it's worth, here's what someone named Keith Lefebvre wrote:
It is hard to find much fault with the company fundamentally. However, there is one lingering risk; they are involved in this industry that built up so much overcapacity that it collapsed upon itself. How long does it take for this growth to get humming again. Home Depot will eventually have some pretty easy prior-year comparables to go up against for earnings and revenue growth. What is the immanent catalyst short-term though? That is the clincher, as noted by S&P in their latest research report.
This stock could languish for years, how long could you stand holding a flat or declining stock.......? They are currently willing to pay you 3.1% to wait, that is more than their closest competitor...
If you are a long term investor though, I'll bet that when the U.S. housing debacle becomes a distant memory, you'll be glad you picked up a few shares of this company.
EleBlog take:
a. He might be right!
b. There are higher dividends than 3.1% if one is looking for yield, tho. There are lower dividends that might be more secure and more interesting in the long run (GE is right now paying $1.12 on its $37 stock price, which works out to about the same -- 3.0%.)
c. I tripped over KL's last point -- "when the U.S. housing debacle becomes a distant memory." He's probably right about this, of course. But -- what if the housing debacle starts to become a distant memory around the years 2012-15...?????
20 Aug, 2007
IES Q3 Results
On 8/13, IES produced its FY07 Q3 report. A few background notes:
a. I couldn't bring up historical prices for this stock on Yahoo! Finance, for reasons unknown to me. I used Big Charts instead. From the look of the chart, IESC has fallen from the $35 range in July down to $21 more recently. Find the IES release here.
b. IES last year went into a "pre-packaged" bankruptcy, emerging having shed a big slice of its debt.
c. Over the years I've followed it (go back to its inception in 1997), this company has had numerous reorganizations, shifts in management, new approaches that were sure to work, new ideas, company initiatives, etc. I once went to Houston and interviewed Bobby Stalvey, who had run a local company bought by IES. He told me when he got to Houston, there were 22 (if my memory serves) initiatives from Houston HQ that local people were supposed to be implementing. Paraphrasing here, Stalvey told me: "It's not possible for people on the local level to do their jobs, locally, AND work on 22 of these. I wanted to get it down to a reasonable level. I thought 3 would be reasonable. The people here [other management types at HQ] wouldn't let me go that far, but I got it down to 5."
d. Years ago, the then-CEO of IES scared the crap out of electrical distributors and manufacturers -- when he said (circa 1999-2000) that IES would hit $3B in annual sales, at an annual run rate, in about 2003. I (on the web) said that wasn't going to happen -- because it was going to be impossible for a company to gain control over all of the local electrical contracting companies that IES had bought (my mind remembers the number 80, but that might not be accurate).
e. It was't possible. I was right (very, very, VERY right!). IEC's Q3 report shows sales through 3/4ths of this fiscal year at $666M. The company won't break $1B this year.
Now, for a look at the Q3 report:
f. That $666M is below the nearly $684M that IES did through 3/4ths of 2006.
g. Q3 sales of $222.6M were below the $241.1M in FY06.
h. Profit margins ARE higher this year. The gross margin in '07 is 16.8% thus far, vs. 15.2% through 9 months of FY06. This might be the result of:
- IES has finally shed enough of its money-losing local operations (it has sold numbers of these local operations off over time, usually selling them back to the people who initial sold them into IES . . . electrical contractors with TONS of local savvy).
- The company is doing a better job of selecting jobs to take on, and a better job of estimating what it will cost to do them profitably.
- Having taken on fewer jobs, the company is managing them better.
- All of the above.
STRANGE INFORMATION
All of the above is preamble for what Freaked Me Out about this quarterly release. Right up there in the headline, it said IES was reporting Q3 results "and Announces Operational Restructuring Initiative." What, yet again? YES. This time, the company "has commenced restructuring its operations into three major lines of business: Industrial, Commercial and Residential" -- from its current decentralized structure.
[I really like the use of the word "commenced" in there. It reminds me of Casey Stengel, the former Yankees manager, who used that word fairly frequently.]
"With our transformation program well underway [EleBlog Note: This is DIFFERENT from the reorg discussed immediately above!!!!!], we are seeing improvement in our core processes of estimating, screening new work, and project management, all of which contributed to a better gross margin in the quarter. Also, our cash management program continues to produce solid results."
There is MORE.
"With this new business alignment, we are accelerating our efforts to improve efficiency and productivity while continuing to deliver superior services to our customers." -- from Caliel.
[EleBlog Note: We should, all of us, come to appreciate how well the transformation program and the operational restructuring dovetail.]
AND STILL MORE
"Most importantly, these changes will enable our field operations to focus even more on our customers' needs. We look forward to reporting on our progress each quarter as we implement this plan." -- from Caliel.
Let's add it all together:
2 -- the company (which is 100% non-union, as far as I know) is "taking decisive steps" to lower its cost structure. Why the heck is THAT necessary? There have been restructurings, initiatives galore, and a bankruptcy filing long before this. Was IES still in parlous condition, after all of that, as far as bringing costs down?
3 -- the transformation program involves adjusting estimating and project selection, as well as cash flow management (and the goddess Fortuna only knows what else).
One conclusion might be: THIS IS UGLY. How ugly? I stole a look at the bottom line -- cents per share in earnings. Here's what it shows after 9 months:
The New IES, 2 months (May-June 2006) of FY06 -- earnings per share = 7 cents before deductions for discontinued operations.
The OLD IES, 7 months of FY06 (ended April 2006) -- earnings per share = $1.48 before deductiosn for discontinued ops.
20 Aug, 2007
Goldfield Corp.
One result: GV shares, which at one time earlier this year had daily closes near a buck and a quarter (i.e., $1.23), closed last Friday at 73 cents. This kind of performance lands you in the category of "No Fun Whatsoever." See GV's Q2 results here.
BAD: The company saw decreases in its electrical construction segment in Q1 and its first half. Of course, it did the same in real estate. In theory, a company has disparate operating divisions so that one offsets the other (i.e., one goes up when the other goes down -- at the very least). This isn't happening here.
REALLY BAD: I thought this quote from the 3rd paragraph of the GV release was telling --
Yeeeeeeeeeeeek!
20 Aug, 2007
MISCOR Group
Find MISCOR's Q2 release here. The thing that caught my eye is that, thanks to the sale of 62.5M shares of its stock, MISCOR has knocked down its deb-to-equity ratio from 7.4-to-1 to 1-to-1. Pretty neat trick.
What might be dismaying is that, accoridng to the release, this company -- which isn't new, but does have "newly minted" stock -- just recently completed a reorg of its operations. It now has 2 segments -- RRM (repair, remanufacturing, and manufacturing) and CES (construction and engineering services). In Q2, RRM's $12.1M in sales was a 12% gain; CES had $4.6M in revenue, up 26% "due to increases in electrical contracting, a strong local constructionmarket, and growing name brand recognition."
Further dismaying is this quote from John Martell, the boss: "The industrial services sector has substantial potential . . . blahblahblah." OK -- quick now: In which area (RRM or CES) is "the industrial services sector"....?
20 Aug, 2007
Black Box
Here are parts of the release that seemed unfortunate:
b. Note that FCF is NOT a GAAP term (it's unofficial), but Black Box's release notes that "management believes that FCF . . . .is an important measurement of liquidity, as it represents total cash available to the company."
c. Thus, measuring BBOX's Q1 performance by a self-created, non-standard metric, the company didn't measure up in its Q1.
Other news:
e. On the positive side, BBOX stock is up to $42. On the negative side, that's where it was the last few days of 2006. Essentially, holders of BBOX have stood still -- not counting two 6-cent dividends -- while the Dow has bounced up (and, more recently, down). Maybe that's a good thing?
10 Aug, 2007
EMCOR Q2 Note
According to Frank MacInnis (the boss), "Our U.S. Electrical & Facilities Services segment companies nearly doubled their operating income [compared with Q2 '06, one assumes] to $21.2 million or 6.2% of revenues on an 11% increase in revenues."
I can't find the transcript online, but you can listen to the conference call (a web recording) at EMCOR's home page.
31 Jul, 2007
EMCOR's Quarter
However, the news is amazing.
The company's backlog of work is at $4.26 billion, a record high. It's up 32% over 6/30/06. It's up 10.9% over 3/31/07. More impressive is the claim of Frank T. MacInnis, the boss here, that the composition of the backlog now includes "larger and more complex projects, which tend to have longer durations and increasing profit opportunities." A few years ago, EMCOR's backlog had more public-sector projects in it. Those had lower profit opportunities, and the company's results reflected that.
Operating income came in at 3.1% of revenues in Q2 '07, vs. 2.1% for Q2 '06.
Organic revenue growth in the quarter was 11.5%.
EMCOR's operations include electrical contracting, mechanical contracting, and facilities services.
EleBlog take: I am a BIG fan of EMCOR and of Mr. MacInnis. However, I do not own EME stock (or have any other investment in the company). Reason: I don't think I could ethically rave about the company's performance if I had stock in the thing. Is EME stock a buy right now? Generally speaking, I'd be giving the stock market a wide berth at this very moment, so my answer (were I to remove the self-applied shackles) would be NO.
But if you take the time to check out EMCOR's situation, you can see that it has no debt, that it's been very prudent in terms of shopping for acquisitions (even during the go-go contractor roll-up days of 1997-2001), and that the company is now generating cash flow -- and if the backlog numbers and characterization are honest, it will do more of that in the future.
A big change for EMCOR, as I've written here recently, comes from that 2-for-1 split. Before the split, the company had too few shares outstanding to earn the notice of Wall Street types. This has now changed. There could well be more recommendations from more analysts coming the company's way in the near future which -- should the stock market calm down (???) -- might make this a worthwhile investment.
23 Jul, 2007
MacInnis Q+A
I've listened to MacInnis in conference calls with analysts, I've read transcripts, I've even seen TV commercials and CNBC-TV interviews with him. What I like about the guy is that he is A Straight Shooter. He doesn't tailor his answers.
More of this is on display in a USA Today Q-and-A with MacInnis. Among the flat declarative statements in here:
"A CEO has to read as much as possible, not just about his own business, but about broad trends."
"The construction industry is made up of optimistic people, somet o a fault."
"That's what every CEO does in a nutshell, decides how to allocate capital between risk and reward. Every company needs to be willing to take a measured chance and take advantage of trends. But it's a terrible mistake to put all your assets into a perceived trend."
It breaks my heart that I've not been able to invest in EME stock. Why not? I write about electrical construction; I think it would be at least unethical for me to write glowing stuff about EMCOR and MacInnis (as I have several times in the past) and be a stockholder. So I don't own any, and won't. But the company is almost debt-free, is huge (more than $5 billion in annual sales), and just underwent a 2-for-1 stock split. You might look into it.
[About the split: I don't believe you should buy a stock because of a stock split. In this case, EMCOR had a problem BEFORE the split -- it didn't have very many shares outstanding. It still doesn't. However, I have noticed that, since the split, there are more stock brokers "initiating coverage" on EMCOR. That's probably because there are more shares outstanding. Weird, eh?]
05 Apr, 2007
Integrated Electrical - Stray Facts
1. In FY04 (ended 9/30/04), IES, pre-bankruptcy, had $838 million in sales. In FY05, it was $869 million. In the 7-month period up to the bankruptcy (from 10/1/05 to 4/30/06), the company had $530 million in sales. In the 5-month period after the bankruptcy (5/1/06 to 9/30/06), the new IES had $420 million in sales. HERE is what's different: In the most recent (5-month) period, 43% of the company's total sales came from Residential. Back in 2004, the company got 33.7% of its annual sales from Residential. Thanks to shedding various companies -- a lot of sell-offs in the past couple of years -- IES has morphed into a company in which Residential plays a bigger role. It's weird that this happened just in time for a new housing construction down-turn!
2. "Our residential business has experienced significant growth. Our compound annual growth rate from residential electrical revenue has grown 11.3% from fiscal 2002 through 2006, compared to an industry average of approximately 8.3% over the same period. Residential electrical contracting represented approximately 34%, 37%, and 42% of our revenues for the years ended September 30 2004, 2005, and 2006, respectively."
3. "Costs derived from labor and related expenses currently account for 44% of our total costs" . . . "Cost incurred for materials installed on project currently account for 52% of our total costs."
4. On 7/16/06, the company sold $1 million in stock to Tontine Capital Overseas Master Fund L.P., which owns 34% of IES' outstanding stock. Purpose: To make a new investment in Energy Photovoltaics, Inc. IES took the money and invested it in EPV; IES has a history of investing in EPV -- and (unfortunately) . . . thus far . . . seeing not very much from the deal. As of 9/30/05, IES has decreased the carrying value of its investment in EPV to ZERO. "Additionally, we had a note receivable from EPV of $18 million that was completely written off" before 9/30/05. IES now owns 17.64% of EPV, a figure which could be decreased as low as 15.81% (assuming various stock options and warrants are exercised). Find the company at www.epv.net.
5. IES also has an investment in EnerTech Capital Partners II L.P. This (apparently -- see www.enertechcapital.com) is some kind of partnershpi that invests in energy projects. IES has invested $4.7 million total in the partnership, a deal that had a "carrying value" as of 9/30/06 of $2.9 million.
(More)
10 Jan, 2007
IES Q4 Conference Call
22 Dec, 2006
IES Statement Creates Question
First, see the release here. Second, here's the segment (in the IES release's first few paragraphs) that I'm choking on. I've taken the liberty of putting the sentence that's distracting the heck out of me in bold:
"Fiscal 2006 was a year of transition for IES," stated Michael Caliel, IES' president and chief executive officer. "The financial restructuring was a pivotal step in strengthening the foundation this company needs to be successful in the future. We still have much to do in order to reach our goals. However, in the first full quarter as the new IES, we generated positive operating income from Continuing Operations and with the continued support of our customers, we produced double digit growth of new work in backlog.
"More importantly, during the fiscal fourth quarter, our management team invested significant time assessing the operations to better understand the capabilities and potential of this organization. Based on our findings, we embarked on a comprehensive program that we believe will allow IES to more fully capitalize its potential.
"Our focus is on building the company's core competencies, such as estimating, project management and supply chain management, as well as removing costs that do not add value. We are also focused on cash management, and we have implemented very aggressive programs aimed at improving our cash flow."
- - - - -Here's my understanding of IES, in a nutshell:
1. It was assembled in the 1997-2001 period, during the contractor roll-up mania.
2. Companies acquired by IES mostly had several items in common. They were big independents. They were non-union. And they were, generally speaking, well-run (i.e, they generated a profit).
3. In the past two years, IES has revamped itself. It has sold off supposedly less-than-stellar local operations -- contracting companies that it bought earlier. In many cases, the buyers were the very people from whom IES bought the things! Additionally, thanks to a brief trip into Bankruptcy, and emergence via what's called a "pre-pack" (pre-packaged bankruptcy solution), IES has cleaned up its balance sheet, shedding debt.
4. A simple diagnosis of IES is that it is a roll-up that failed. The act of taking a bunch of successful local electrical contractors and fashioning them into a national unit is (apparently) very, very difficult.
5. However, I have been under the impression that the various units of IES knew their business. That is to say, I thought companies such as Daniel Electrical Contractors (Florida) and Primo Electric Co. (Baltimore) knew what the heck they were doing. In fact, before reading the bold-faced sentence above, I would have CERTAINLY told you that the basic "blocking and tackling" of electrical construction was NOT a problem at IES.
- - - - -
That last bit is the reason I've read the sentence above 8 times in less than 2 days. If you read it in context (which is why I provided all of the material that appears above the bold-faced sentence), the official quote from the boss at IES seems to say:
b. We came up with a program.
c. That program involves "building" the company's ability to do the basic stuff that any electrical contractor has to do.
- - - - -
Holy moley! Perhaps I'm misinterpreting what I'm reading. But: No matter how I parse it, that sentence says that IES management is "reviewing core competencies" -- estimating, project management, and supply chain (relationships with distributors, reps, and manufacturers).
There is an obvious inference: The company's leaders do not think it is doing estimating, project management, and buying of installables (and more) all that well.
Unfortunately, I can't speak with any expertise. I don't know the facts from inside the company.
However, it is startling -- at the very least -- to think that after shedding a bunch of money-losing operations, IES had to go back to Square One -- "this is a football" -- with the people and units that remain with the company.
- - - - -
How could such a thing come about? I can hazard some guesses, which I present here as independent alternatives.
Either:
The really good people left IES in droves, including estimators and project managers who knew what they were doing. The local operating units do not have an "institutional memory" of how to go about doing first-class estimating and project management (which I think most of them DID at one time have).
This seems the best possible explanation.
OR
Despite the fact that it sold off a big bunch of money-losing local contracting units, IES has found a wide variance in the skill levels of estimators and project managers that it employs all over the U.S.
This would be dismaying.
OR
Someone at IES HQ thinks there should be an "IES way" to do things, uniformly, throughout the country. So estimating must be done "according to the book," and project management, and everything else. If this is true, even Heaven won't be able to help this company.
You're probably laughing about this, but it's precisely what I saw from Waste Management, Inc., in the 1980s. This not only didn't work, it hurt the company.
OR
A final alternative is: The people at IES HQ (management) do not know what the heck they are doing. Despite the fact that the words above came from the company's official release, these folks are so damn dumb that they are unaware they are spending money to make themselves look like a gang of idiots.
Now, I guess, you see why I keep re-reading the sentence.
(More)
22 Sep, 2006
IFS Presentation
I've posted a 1.02-MB file from InfraSource, an electrical contractor that specializes in powerline construction. It's a 38-page PDF which consists of 31 slides from the company's presentation at the 5th annual Engineering & Construction Conference sponsored by D.A. Davidson & Co.
Download it by clicking here.
07 Aug, 2006
IES: Shaky Hands On The Tiller?
Integrated Electrical Services ended its 2nd quarter on 3/31/06.
The company filed it's 10-Q (quarterly report) with the SEC (Securities & Exchange Commission) on 5/10.
One day later, the company filed an amended 10-Q -- to correct an error. Apparently, the date of the quarter's end was incorrect in the original "certifications" filed by the CEO and CFO (these were included in the 10-Q).
Then, on June 29th (seven weeks later), IES issued another amended 10-Q (yes, for the same quarter) "to correct a misstatement of insurance expense" contained in the original filing + the first amended filing.
I don't think this is "the end of the world." But it makes the company seem on a shaky footing.
31 Jul, 2006
MacInnis On Energy
Frank MacInnis, the boss at EMCOR Group, is CEO of the company that houses the largest U.S. electrical contractor (and the largest mechanical contractor, too). EMCOR declared its earnings on 7/27, and CNBC-TV took the opportuinty to interview MacInnis.
You can see/hear a replay on the Web -- at www.emcorgroup.com (click the link on the left-hand side).
Here's what I heard, in a Q-and-A with Bill Griffeth:
Griffeth made a reference to various energy plants on the drawing board, but asked -- is it really too little, too late? MacInnis: Yes.
MacInnis expanded on the point, saying we're facing a natural gas shortage. For EMCOR, he said, expansion of the nation's LNG infrastructure -- and distributed power work -- are great opportunities.
Griffith asked what MacInnis would do about the energy problem if he ruled the world. Many interviewees would come up short, or pause, or (even) giggle. I liked the fact that MacInnis took the question in stride, answering -- without hesitation: "Get started on a return to nuclear power."
Note that EMCOR is not in the nuclear business (other than whatever work it would get from building and maintaining nuclear plants).
27 Jul, 2006
Rexel-GE Supply
Yes, I'm back from an extended absence, which included preparing for a vacation (getting all of the work done ahead of time), the vacation itself (two glorious weeks in Botswana -- seeing dozens and dozens of elephants), and recovering from the vacation (adjusting my internal time zones + trying to leave lethargy in the dust).
- - - - -
The BIG news in the period between my last post and this one was the acquisition by Rexel SA of GE Supply. I was called upon to do a write-up for TEDMAG.com -- a "second-week lead" on the deal. It's 928 words, with some perspectives you might not find elsewhere (he said, immodestly). Read it here.
A couple of notes:
a. YES, I work for Rexel Inc., the U.S. subsidiary of Paris-based Rexel SA. I am a freelance wordsmith. One of my jobs is as Editor of Rexel's U.S. magazine, POWER OUTLET.
b. Fact (a) doesn't mean I have any inside information on this deal.
c. Rexel and Wesco are now neck-and-neck for the title of #1 electrical distributor in the U.S. in terms of sales voluime. Graybar appears to be #3. Wesco's first-half '06 sales were $2.6B; some of that, I think, was nonelectrical. Rexel's 2005 sales, adding GE Supply, come out to about $4.7B. Add in 10% or so for 2006, and you come to more than $5.1B. Double Wesco's first half, and you get about $5.2B. See?
d. I know it's important to writers and editors, but I'm not sure the specifics of whether Wesco, Rexel, or Graybar is #1, #2, or #3 in U.S. sales volume matters to anyone else. It's a fact, but it might not have a a great deal of relevance or importance.
e. On the other hand, Rexel SA -- the global company -- might have sales of $12B to $13B in 2006, thanks to the GE Supply acquisition (and a number of smaller recent buys). That's what the TEDMAG article says. That's a might nice neighborhood!
f. What matters, of course, is profitability. Along those lines:
- Rexel said it's Q1 gross margins were 25.2%
- Wesco said its 1H gross margins were 20%.
- Graybar's Q1 gross margins (from its 10Q filing with the SEC) were 19.8%.
- - - - -
Thanks for your patience with me. I've got a plan; you'll find more information, and more interesting material, here on the EleBlog in the coming weeks.
10 Jun, 2006
HW+C Goes Public
Houston Wire & Cable, which supplies . . . wire and cable! -- to electricaldistributors, is selling stock to the public. The IPO should take place really soon. I've posted the S-1/A (amended statement leading to an IPO) from the company -- a 157-page, 1.2MB PDF. The stock symbol on NASDAQ will be HWCC.
Download the PDF by clicking here.
19 Apr, 2006
Info On Square D & Juno
Back in mid-2005, Schneider Electric’s North American Operating Division (SENAOD) bought Juno Lighting. SENAOD essentially = Square D and a few other moving parts. Square D is, of course, “the contractor brand” of electrical construction products. Schneider is based in Paris.
Recently, in clearing out various files, I found a transcript of a Schneider conference call held about its acquisition of Juno back in mid-2005. I never put it to any use, probably the result of an overwhelming influx of information at the time.
But there’s some stuff worth knowing in there. Before I pitch it, here are some slices, all quotes from Dave Petratis of SENOAD:
“Clearly, Juno is is the industry reference in the
U.S. down-lighting market, with a total market share of 18% and it ranks number 2.” “Very clearly, obviously, Juno will enhance our position in the residential market in the
U.S., since Juno’s sales breakdown is 45% in the residential market. And you know that this has been one of Schneider’s goals, to rebalance its sales breakdown in the residential markets.” “If we look at the lighting segment or the available market in lighting . . . we see it’s a $12.4 billion market in
North America. Juno brings us the opportunity access $4.8B of this $12B market. . . . we calculate [the down-lighting segment] at about $1.3B, in which Juno has an 18% market share.” “30% of [Juno’s] business is in track lighting . . . overall sales for Juno in 2004 was $242M. They have an operating margin of 21% and 1,000 employees.”
“ . . . from an opportunistic standpoint . . . Juno can be more aggressively developed in
Canada . . . as well as Mexico. The down-lighting market is present in Mexico, not well-developed by Juno. Schneider Electric, under its Square D brand, has been in Mexico for over 60 years. And in the residential segment, we have over 50% market share.” “ . . . to give you an idea, in the contractor segment, residential and industrial construction, we have about a 38% market share.” – the context here suggests he’s talking about SENAOD and Square D, not Juno.
“Today, in an average home in the
U.S., Schneider Electric provides about $250 per home. We [can] more than quadruple this . . . when you add the down-lighting piece, we clearly get a bigger part of the purchase in residential and commercial construction.” The Juno buy “puts us in a position to understand and participate very intimately as LEDs are introduced.”
“We will increase Juno sales through electrical contractor promotion, where we have tremendous relationships with large builders, where we have tremendous relationships with large builders, focused not only on commercial construction but residential. I would remind you that residential construction today has really consolidated over the last decade . . . the developing of cross-selling to national accounts is clearly attractive for us.”
In the Q-and-A, an analyst asked about Juno’s Modulight product. Here’s what Petratis said about that: “Juno, through its Modulight business development, is creating a rupture in what we call the traditional trapper space. So it’s really a business in its infancy. But it addresses about a $1.8B market, in what we would call fluorescent lighting systems.” I’m not sure that “trapper space” quote wasn’t misquoted by whoever typed up this transcript.
Another analyst Q asked about what portion of Juno’s sales were going through big-box retailers (Home Depot, Lowe’s). Petratis: “It’s less than 1%. Juno has been very loyal to their wholesale distribution. And we clearly see that there’s an opportunity for us to help facilitate that in the right way.”
Another Q was about the profit margins of different lighting suppliers. What’s the difference? Why do some make more than others? The difference, Petratis said, was; “Focus – Juno are a focus player. And as we know, focused players tend to be more profitable. It’s this very efficient business model, which takes advantage of 40% outsourcing [to
Asia] and variable sales compensation [Juno uses reps]. And it’s an excellent model.”
Much of what’s above is background information -- selected details about SENAOD, Juno, and Square D of which you perhaps were not aware. I certainly didn’t know that the Square D brand had a 50% market share in
NEWS in what’s above – albeit more than 9 months old at this point (the conference call took place 6/30/05) – includes:
- Plans to expand Juno’s presence on the shelves of big box retailers.
- Scheider gets about $250 in sales per new
U.S. home. - All of the market share and background figures about Juno, including it’s 18% share of the downlighting market.
- Petratris’s remarks about Modulight – specifically, use of the word “rupture.”
Note: Power Outlet magazine, which is published by large distributor Rexel, has run a few articles about Modulight. I’m the Editor of Power Outlet. If you don’t know about Modulight, you probably should (as a user, contractor, distributor, competitor, or whatever) – take a look at this two-page PDF of an article which appeared in the Spring 2005 issue.
# # #
13 Apr, 2006
IES: Valuation At Issue
It’s tough for me to know what’s going on most of the time. I did extensive reporting here about the bankruptcy of Integrated Electrical Services – but it was surface reporting. I did not dive into the 385-page documents filed with the SEC.
I did write a column, for TEDMAG.com, which posted there 1/26/05. (Yes -- in early 2005, 10+ months before IES pulled the plug on itself). The column basically asked: Why doesn't IES just liquidate itself? Here’s an excerpt:
Like the rube at a poker game, the IES board continues to yell, "Deal!" The smart move would be to let the thing go bust, sell off all operations to any buyers, and try very hard to forget the whole thing. Smart players know when to raise the stakes -- and they also know when to walk away from the table.
To see the whole column, click here.
Recently, of course, IES finished selling off various parts of itself and declared bankruptcy. I thought it was weird and premature (the company was NOT in awful financial trouble).
As it turned out, what IES did was a “prepack” – a prepackaged bankruptcy, with a plan for emerging as a whole company, with new owners. Stockholders (those who owned 100% of the company before the bankruptcy) were relegated to the back of the line, and were to end up with 15% of the new company.
Boiled down to its essentials, the bankruptcy got IES out from under $170-million-plus in debt. The folks who loans that money are (in the plan) to get 82% ownership of the new IES. Here’s a selection of IES news that’s appeared here in recent months:
12/15/05 – IES Agreement With Note Holders
1/2/06 – IES: Here’s the Situation (with links to various docs)
2/15/06 – IES Goes For It (link to press release on bankruptcy filing)
What’s New As Of 3/31
The “official committee of equity security holders” of IES has issued a document, dated 3/31. It is devastating. If you think markets and legal activities are rigged, this four-page document will convince you. Download the 4-page PDF from here.
You should read it, whether you hold IES stock or debt or compete with IES or sell to IES – or not. You should read it because you are (I think) a Capitalist, and it appears that what’s gone on here . . . might smell a bit.
I’m not going to quote the entire document, but let me summarize three devastating bullet points from the 4-page doc:
- An expert hired by the committee “believes that the projections of EBITDA and free cash flow through 2010 . . . may be understated.” If this understatement is corrected, the expert says, the result would be “a significant increase in enterprise value.”
- Cash on the IES balance sheet was ignored in valuing IES as it approached bankruptcy. How much cash? The report says this “results in a $32.5 million understatement of value.”
- Net operating loss carry-forwards (translation: potential future tax reductions) were ignored in valuing IES. The committee says these losses have “a present value in excess of $18 million.”
There’s more, but let’s ignore another 4th bullet point and cut to the chase.
“The committee believes the Debtors have so understated the value of the New Common Stock upon the Debtors’ emergence from chapter 11 that the allocation of 82% to holders of the Senior Subordinated Notes constitutes a material overpayment of those claims to the detriment of existing shareholders.” (emphasis added by EleBlog)
# # #
15 Mar, 2006
IES Bankruptcy News
Integrated Electrical Services posted a 282-page PDF today -- an 8K filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission. It is, essentially, the company's plan to emerge from bankruptcy, and includes details of what's going to happen with the newly reconstituted company. According to the filing, the court date is set for April 25. There's a heck of a lot of legal details in this filing, but I've posted it, if you're interested -- it's a 1.7MB document -- click here.
Once the legal stuff is put away, the company will, once again, have stock on the public markets. According to the filing, the stock will be allocated as follows:
12.63 million shares to holders of senior subordinated note claims (in exchange for the IES debt they hold).
I believe these folks were owed on the order of $173 million. They get 82% of the new company. All other things being equal, this would seem to value the company at about $210 million.
2.3 million shares of stock will go to the holders of 41 million shares of OLD stock in IES. This is 15% of the new company. These will be awarded on a pro-rata basis to folks who held roughly 39 million of the OLD shares.
Note that, during the “contractor roll-up” excitement of the late 1990s, IES stock got up over the $20/share mark. That means the collective shareholder stake was worth roughly $780 million.
At the new company’s valuation, these folks collectively own around $32 million of stock. Quite a come-down!
462,125 shares – or 3% of the new company – are set aside for management. Of that, 5/6ths (2.5% of the company) is going to existing IES management. The rest (0.5%) is reserved for the new Chief Executive Officer and/or other new key employees, to be allocated by the board of directors of Reorganized IES.
07 Mar, 2006
Hughes News
Here's the latest news on the acquisition of Hughes Supply by The Home Depot (a deal which is all but done!). Much of this comes from or as a result of stuff printed in the Orlando Sentinel newspaper (
HD SUPPLY TO MOVE TO
HUGHES EXECS GET PAID – a column (by Susan Strother Clarke) in the 2/17 Sentinel noted that “30 honchos and board members” of Hughes “will walk away from this deal a whole lot richer – pocketing as much as $212 million, collectively.”
Clarke wrote this: “It’s impossible for me to justify how so few can be made so very comfortable, while so many more just soldier on.” She went on to note that Tom Morgan, CEO, will get more than $30 million from the deal “after just five short years of service.” Other specifics:
- CFO David Bearman “will get up to $20 million if he doesn’t work for Home Depot.”
- COO Neal Keating “will be forced to limp along with about $13 million” if he doesn’t work for HD.
“David Hughes, whose family founded the company, will receive more than $40 million from all his stock holdings. He’s also eligible for more than $5 million in severance and retirement – as well as almost $1 million more to help him with his tax bill," she wrote.
HUGHES EXECS OBJECT – Clarke’s column was followed by a Letter to the Editor from Chairman David Hughes of Hughes, which both appeared in the paper (2/28) AND was filed with the SEC by Hughes Supply.
“The fact is that most of the payment she cites as being excessive are for stock and retirement benefits which are already owned and otherwise earned,” it said.
“Most good companies have change-in-control provisions because it is difficult to recruit and retain top executives like Tom Morgan, David Bearman, and Neal Keating without some assurance that they won’t lose everything in the event of a takeover.”
ELEBLOG OBJECTS TO THE OBJECTION – Here’s the text of a paragraph from a document Hughes filed (on 2/27/06) with the SEC on its coming acquisition. This was part of ONE paragraph, but I've broken it up for readability:
At a meeting held on October 19, 2005, the compensation committee approved the Company entering into renewed and amended change in control severance agreements with up to 18 senior executives, as well as certain amendments to the Company's Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan.
The committee determined that the renewal of the severance agreements and the amendments to the Company's Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan were essential for retention of the Company's senior executives, especially in light of the uncertainties surrounding the sale process. The severance agreements were also intended to promote uniform treatment of the Company's senior executives.
The terms of the renewed severance agreements were substantially similar to the expired agreements, but added gross-up payments for excise taxes that may be payable under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, a non-competition and non-solicitation covenant, a continuation of benefits provision relating to health and life insurance, and a reduction in the termination benefit from three times average annual compensation to two times average annual compensation, for each senior executive except the Chairman, CEO, CFO and COO.
In other words, the “change in control” provisions referenced in the letter to the editor of Feb. 28th had been altered, at the very least, on Oct. 19. On or before that date, the Hughes board and executives had very good reason to suspect that a change in control was about to take place. There is no other conclusion to reach except this one: With the company "in play" and about to be taken over, management and the board monkeyed with the "change in control" provisions.
Without sorting out all of the details, this certainly has the LOOK of folks helping themselves.
There is a way to benefit from a change in control, you know, for board members and managements of public companies, and it is NOT revolutionary, illegal, or questionable:
They can buy stock in the companies for which they work ahead of time, and have faith that their hard work will result in increased profits and a higher stock price (which happened at Hughes BEFORE the acquisition talk started!).
. . . of course, it's a lot easier to WAIT until the company is "in play" and revise or create "change in control" provisions that put cash in one's pocket. The method that seems to have been chosen here by the Hughes board/management has tremendous advantages over the approach I suggest, including a lack of risk and amazingly good timing.
# # #
03 Mar, 2006
EMCOR: I Told You So, 2
EMCOR's stock recently split 2-for-1. I checked this morning (before the market opened); last night's close (Thursday March 2) was $42.89. That makes the pre-split price above $85.
I told you so.
On Oct. 8, 2003, TEDMAG.com posted a column I wrote after some bad news had caused EMCOR Group's stock to swoon. The fainting spell took the stock to $41 a share before I wrote. Here's the key paragraph (about earnings-per-share expectations and the ultimate stock price):
The original expectations MacInnis expressed for EMCOR earnings per share were in the $4.50 range. Someday in the next few years, EMCOR's earnings WILL top $5/share.The company has damn little debt for a construction company -- and debt really does kill! At 17 times earnings -- a slight premium to the multiple I would put on the market, which would be 15 (not the 30-plus that seems to be the average) . . . EMCOR would trade at $85. That's a reasonable three-year or even five-year return from $41, doncha think?
Note that (unlike the touts you may see on CNBC), I don't own EMCOR stock, and never have. I believe that, to be ethical, I can't own, short, buy puts or calls, or even buy or sell the bonds of the companies I write about in the electrical/datacom industry. So I don't.
Don't feel sorry for me; I didn't buy stock in Encompass (bankrupt and gone) or IES (bankrupt and soon to emerge).
However, the point is: Had you followed my advice in October 2003, you would have done DAMN well! It turns out that the stock price fell further, so by the time the column referenced above posted to TEDMAG, EMCOR's stock had fallen to the $33 level. It never got out of the $30 range during the rest of the month. Had you purchased at the high price in the balance of October ($37.97, according to Yahoo! finance) -- you'd have better than a double today.
It's less than 30 months later. Had you bought the S&P 500 on 10/31/03, your return would be less than 30%, including dividends.
So, I think I really earned this one -- I told you so!
(More)01 Mar, 2006
Hughes Supply Proxy
On Feb. 27, Hughes Supply filed a document that it sent to shareholders -- who have to vote on the company's proposed acquisition by The Home Depot. It's a 141-page PDF, and it puts forward the case for the merger. Obviously, in some detail. There's a lot of info here; some of it can be ignored (as it's oriented to shareholders, who have to vote). Best advice: Start on Page 22.
If I've posted it correctly, you can download it from here.
27 Feb, 2006
A Hughes Question - Answered
Lots of folks have been speculating on what's going to happen to the Hughes Supply folks after The Home Depot purchases the company. The 2/23 Orlando Sentinel had this tiny item, buried somewhere, which seems to indicate that President Tom Morgan isn't going to be working for HD! The sale is slated to be finalized before May Day.
[snip, snip]
Montana bound
Hughes Supply Inc. chief executive Tom Morgan will be moving to Montana after Home Depot completes the purchase of the Orlando-based Fortune 500 company this spring. Morgan said he is building a guest home there now and plans to live in it this summer while he builds the main home in Bigfork, near Glacier National Park. Several of his Isleworth neighbors will build there as well, he said, along with another longtime friend, University of Tennessee football coach Phil Fulmer. "We hope to grow old together," Morgan said.
17 Feb, 2006
More IES News
Developments:
1. IES filed a 357-page (that's the length of the PDF) 8K with the Securities & Exchange Commission on 2/15.
2. I got a phone call from someone I trust -- and I don't trust many -- in the industry yesterday (TH 2/16). He told me that IES mailed checks to its vendors/suppliers on Thursday, after getting court clearance. IES has said all along that it would not "stiff" its vendors, and apparently it will not do so.
3. A LOT OF THIS IS CONFUSING. I capitalize that, because some of this is hard to follow. It will take me some time to sort through 357 pages of legal crap and distill something to put here, for example. But in going over the 8K filing quickly, I noted this section under "Conference Call With Vendors" -- which, I think, kind of makes the point.
Two quick points:
(a) This was one paragraph in the filing; I subdivided it to boost readability;
(b) Byron Snyder, the guy referenced below, is not an idiot. I've never met him, but I've learned a lot about him (he is the founder of IES, and took over running of the firm only recently). He just made a mistake -- because what's going on at this company is SO complex, even the very intelligent prime mover (Snyder) can't keep all of the facts straight!
"On February 14, 2006, in connection with the Chapter 11 Cases, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, C. Byron Snyder, held a conference call with key vendors in which he inadvertently misstated certain details regarding the Company’s surety bonding arrangements. As previously disclosed in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 7, 2006, the Company has an agreement for surety bonding with Federal Insurance Company for debtor-in-possession surety bonding in the aggregate amount of $48 million.
"The Company does not have an agreement with International Bonding and Construction Services at the present time, although the Company does engage in discussions and makes arrangements with bonding sources from time to time in the ordinary course of business.
"In addition, on February 15, 2006, Mr. Snyder was quoted in the Houston Chronicle (Bill Hensel Jr., Quick Work Planned on Debt — IES to Swap Stock in a Fast Bankruptcy Exit , Houston Chronicle, February 15, 2006, at D1) stating that the Company’s cash flow “is and continues to remain extremely strong.” As set forth in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2006, the Company’s cash flow from operations in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 was $1.1 million, an improvement of $10.2 million from the same quarter in fiscal 2005, although net cash and cash equivalents at the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2006 was lower than at the beginning of the quarter by approximately $3.5 million.
"Moreover, the Financial Projections show a projected decrease in cumulative cash flow (cumulative net disbursements) during the 13 weeks following the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases of approximately $24 million, reflecting the expected negative impact of the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases on the Company’s business and including approximately $4.2 million in net restructuring-related disbursements."
# # #
15 Feb, 2006
IES Debt Rating
Here's today's news from Standard & Poors, which rates debt:
- - - - -
Integrated Electrical Services Inc. Ratings Lowered To 'D'
NEW YORK Feb. 14, 2006--Standard & Poor's Ratings Services said today that it lowered its corporate credit rating on Houston, Texas-based Integrated Electrical Services Inc. to 'D' from 'CC'. At the same time, the rating on the company's senior subordinated notes was lowered to 'D' from 'C'. IES, one of the larger electrical contractors in the U.S., had total debt of about $223 million as of Dec. 31, 2005.
"The downgrade reflects the company's decision to file for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code," said Standard & Poor's analyst James Siahaan.
The company said that it has successfully negotiated an $80 million debtor-in-possession financing facility. To execute the financial restructuring through a plan of reorganization, the company has also come to an agreement with institutions controlling 61% of the dollar value on IES' $173 million in senior subordinated notes.
- - - - -
Here's what I think this means:
a. If you're one of the institutions who own 61% of the $173M in senior subordinated notes, you have voted to exchange your debt for equity in the new IES. Together, these folks end up owning 82% of the new IES. It's not clear what that's worth . . .
b. If you're one of the folks owning the other 39%, I'm not sure what happens to you.
c. If you own other debt of IES, you might eventually get paid off, maybe. S&P's "D" rating, translated into plain English, means -- in essence -- "you should live so long!"
Today's lesson: Don't buy the debt of a roll-up company, unless you can stomach the possibility of ending up owning a piece of the thing (instead of being repaid).
# # #
15 Feb, 2006
IES Goes For It
Integrated Electrical Services yesterday (2/14) filed for bankruptcy yesterday -- a filing classified as a "prepack," which stands for "prepackaged bankruptcy."
Bottom line: Holders of the company's common stock, who on 2/13 in theory owned 100% of IES, will now own, together, 15% of the company that emerges from bankruptcy.
See the full IES press release here. Be sure to see the bullet points in the release, which repeat the previously released restructuring plan.
A key bullet point for DISTRIBUTORS who might be doing business with IES:
"the company's other obligations under trade credit extended to the companyby its vendors and suppliers will be unimpaired and will all be paid in full,on regular terms, whether such obligations relate to pre-or post-filing periods."
13 Feb, 2006
News About IES
Integrated Electrical Services remains a company “on hold.” In its Q1 financial release (dated 2/9 – find it here), the company included this information:
Going concern note: Ernst & Young, the company’s auditor, “included a going concern modification in its audit opinion on the company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 2005.” The inclusion of a “going concern” note in financial statements indicates the auditor thinks there is a significant likelihood that the company has a good chance of failing.
Restructuring isn’t a sure thing: “There is no assurance that IES will successfully complete the Restructuring or any other restructuring. At this time neither the agreement in principle nor any other proposed restructuring terms have been agreed to by the requisite holders of the senior subordinated notes, or any other creditor constituency.”
Risks to holders: “Any restructuring could cause the holders of the company’s outstanding securities, including its common stock, senior subordinated notes, and senior convertible notes, to lose some or all of the value of their investment in IES’ securities.”
Risks until the Restructuring happens: “The company’s liquidity may not improve or may be adversely affected, however, until its restructuring is consummated. There is no certainty as to when or if any restructuring will be consummated.”
SOMETHING ELSE OF NOTE
Back in mid-December, IES announced the final sale of one of its business units in a divestiture program that it began in November of 2004. I hadn’t looked at what the company had sold, or who bought it – as most of this is fairly routine.
IES has been selling off commercial/industrial electrical contracting companies that it bought in its roll-up days (1998-2001). In general, these C/I contractors were unprofitable.
But this last sale is INTERESTING.
First, here’s what IES said about the final company its disposed, in a 12/14 press release:
IES has completed its divestiture program with the sale of the majority of the assets of one of its commercial and industrial business units based in
I went looking for more facts. Here’s what the company said about that sale in an SEC filing on 12/13:
On December 13, 2005 Integrated Electrical Services, Inc. (the “Company”), H. R. Allen, Inc., Allen Services, Inc., and Herbert R. Allen, Jr., as guarantor, entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”), providing for the sale of substantially all of the assets of H. R. Allen, Inc. (the “Seller”) to Allen Services, Inc. (the “Buyer”) for a purchase price of approximately $7,100,000, subject to adjustment, including accounts receivable of approximately $1.3 million retained by the Seller, the collection of which are guaranteed by the Buyer.
The closing of the transactions contemplated by the Agreement was consummated on December 14, 2005.
Herbert R. Allen Jr. was formerly the President of the Buyer. The Buyer is owned by Herbert R. Allen Jr. and Miriam Allen. Herbert R. Allen Jr. is also the son of Herbert R. Allen, the former Chief Executive Officer and member of the Board of Directors of the Company. Miriam Allen is the wife of Herbert R. Allen and the mother of Herbert R. Allen, Jr.
So the final company in the IES sell-off was sold off to the son of the company’s immediate past CEO. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with this, necessarily – it’s just interesting. # # #08 Feb, 2006
Hughes-HD Deal - The How
I've posted a 140-page PDF, a filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission by Hughes Supply. Page 25-31 detail how Hughes did the deal -- and seem to indicate that The Home Depot (which has agreed to purchase Hughes) overpaid by 16% or more.
To download the PDF, go here.
To see a brief blow-by-blow digest of what's in those seven pages (written by me) -- go to TEDMAG.com's D-News, here (page down past the Anixter + Wesco financial report to the 2nd item on the page).
14 Jan, 2006
Home Depot Buys Hughes Supply
I’ve attended (and moderated a panel at) the Western Region meeting of the National Association of Electrical Distributors this past week. Adding some spice to the event was Tuesday's news that Home Depot will buy Hughes Supply.
Background: Home Depot’s electrical sales to smaller electrical contractors (and others) have been eating into the market share of the nation’s electrical distributors for years. Hughes Supply’s roots are in electrical distribution (altho the co. has gone waaaaay beyond that).
Details: First, Hughes has 50 electrical branches in five states. The company also sells electrical materials via its utility division (84 branches in 29 states) and probably through it’s MRO operation (which reportedly focuses on apartment house maintenance/repair needs) – 51 branches in 27 states.
Here are Hughes Supply’s electrical sales: Fiscal year 2003 = $375.5 million. FY04 = $362.8M. FY05 = $425.3M. FY06 (first three quarters) = $361.6M.
Hughes had $4.066 billion in sales in the first three quarters of FY06. Water, sewer, and plumbing operations accounted for nearly one-half of that $1.94B.
HOME DEPOT – how about HD? How much of its $73B in FY05 sales were in electrical? No one outside of the company knows for sure, but here’s a summary of what I think we CAN know:
1. HD’s 10K (annual report) filing with the SEC lists “plumbing, electrical, and kitchen” sales for 2005 as 29% of the company’s total.
2A. We don’t know anything for sure but that electrical is LESS than 29% -- it’s some fraction of the total P-E-K sales.
2B. Let’s make some intelligent guesses. Here are stabs at electrical sales:
If electrical is 40% of P-E-K sales, then FY05 electrical sales at HD were $8.5B.
If 33%, then FY05 electrical sales at HD were $7B.
If 30%, then FY05 electrical sales at HD were $6.375B
If 25%, then FY05 electrical sales at HD were $5.3B.
If 20%, then FY05 electrical sales at HD were $4.25B.
I believe the answer is, approximately, in there somewhere. Let’s say, for argument’s sake, that the 30% figure is correct – that is, electrical sales are 30% of the plumbing, electrical, and kitchens total.
If that’s the case, electrical sales in FY05 at Home Depot were roughly $6.4 billion. The addition of Hughes Supply’s electrical segment – headed for roughly $480 million in FY06 electrical segment sales – will certainly ADD to HD’s buying clout with electrical manufacturers . . . but not dramatically.
02 Jan, 2006
IES: Here's The Situation
An awful lot of information has come out in the past month on the situation of Integrated Electrical Services, the big electrical contractor. I've put some of it together here. If you're interested, you might find the following links of use:
Situation Analysis, 1-2-06, by Joe Salimando -- 44K PDF (7 pages) -- access from here.
10-K (annual report) filing with the SEC -- by IES, 12/21/05 -- 1.2MB PDF (149 pages) -- download here.
Form DEF 14A (who owns the company) filing with the SEC -- by IES, 1/19/05 -- 276K PDF (38 pages) -- download here.
Press release announcing the Reorg + a release on IES that followed from Standard & Poor's -- posted to this site 12/15, see it here.
30 Dec, 2005
Suppliers: BDC, CTV, BGC, GLYT
I've downloaded a bunch of reports from Stifel, Nicolaus & Co. -- a brokerage firm -- about various companies in our industry. You can do it, too, by going to the Research tab at www.stifel.com. Here are excerpts I thought you might need to read:
Belden CDT (11/9) – "We are forecasting a strong 36% increase in [earnings per share] in 2006, with 75% of the increase coming from plant restructuring and the completion of its share buyback. We foreast another 20% EPS increase in 2007." The SN estimate is that costs could decline by as much as $20 million – which would be about 20 cents/share – in 2006. Before Belden merged with CDT, the industry rumor-mongers said one of those two companies was in dire straits. The merger apparently created time for "someone" to deal with those problems.
Another note: "North American networking volume was up over 20% [compared to Q3 2004]. BDC stated that it began to re-gain networking market share in the quarter.”
CommScope (10/27) – "We expect CTV's balance sheet to become a major positive during 2006. We forecast cash to reach $350 million at yearend 2006 and nearly $500 million by yearend 2007. CTV will never call its 1% converts, which comprise a majority of its debt."
General Cable (11/01, 11/02, 11/09) – "BGE remains one of our top Infrastructure ideas in our universe." "BGC has achieved the highest profit margin in several years, overcoming copper, plastic compounds, and other rising cost. This is the result of higher volume, plant rationalizations, and cost cutting, and higher pricing."
Also: "The rising price of copper and plastic compounds have become so visible to customers that price increases have become easier to justify and rising plant utilization rates are making implementation easier."
And: "We forecast a 6.3% sales increase in 2006 . . . [with[ BGC's operating profit margin to [improve to] 6.3% from an esitmated 5.0% in 2005."
The net: "Shares of General Cable Corp. are best suited to aggressive growth investors tolerant of near-term volatility. This is a highly leveraged company."
Genlyte Group (10/25) – “GLYT management states that they have still not seen a pick-up in the nonresidential construction market. We track Department of Commerce construction spending data and have seen a consistent increase in nonresidential spending throughout the course of the year . . . GLYT management believes that some of the disconnect . . . is that some larger construction projects may have not yet reached the later stages of completion during which lighting is awarded and installed."
30 Dec, 2005
Analysis: Contractors BBOX, IFS & EME
I've downloaded a bunch of reports from Stifel, Nicolaus & Co. -- a brokerage firm -- about various companies in our industry. You can do it, too, by going to the Research tab atop the site at www.stifel.com. Here are excerpts I thought you might need to read:
Black Box Corp. (11/1) – "We believe that BBOX will be able to finance additional voice services acquisitions with its significant [Free Cash Flow] while also improving its balance sheet. We are upgrading our opinion on BBOX to Market Outperform from Market Perform with a price target of $51."
Also: "Phase II [of the company's growth strategy] involved buying Data Services companies that BBOX believed would compliment existing Hotline Services companies. During the 5 years of Phase II, the company acquired 90 data companies."
And: "BBOX management is looking to acquire telephony operations that have high gross profit margins (which reflect proper pricing in the market) but have a corporate cost structure that is much higher than BBOX in comparison. This allows BBOX to identify areas of excess cost and quickly improve the profitability of acquired operations."
InfraSource Services (analysis dated 11/3/05) – "While IFS is seeing increased bidding activity for larger transmission projects, it has yet to see a win."
Also: ""We are reducing our 2006 EPS forecast to $0.60 from $0.68. The reduction reflects much lower revenues that originally anticipated based on IFS' planned reduction of low-margin work."
EMCOR Group (10/28) – "Commercial work in EME's backlog is at its highest level since 2000 in $ amount and in % of total backlog. The pace at which EME is adding high-margin commercial work is accelerating. This is a key factor to produce higher profit margins in 2006." Elsewhere, SN said that "commercial work made up . . . nearly 35% of the total" backlog.
Future: SN sees EMCOR's revenue hitting $4.9 billion in 2006. "It appears that backlog will begin building in 2006 and that this and increased small project activity, which does not flow through backlog or does quickly, will produce moderate revenue growth in 2006 and stronger growth in 2007.
17 Dec, 2005
Strange Vibrations
On Dec. 11th, I posted something here about EMCOR Group. It included this comment:
Finally, EMCOR has only 16.6 million shares outstanding. That's it -- no preferred stock. Intel has 6 billion shares out. Check it out: Intel has roughly 9 times the sales of EMCOR -- but more than 350 times the number of shares! Key point: There aren't enough shares outstanding for EMCOR to attract major interest from the financial/investment community
Find the post here.
On Dec. 15, EMCOR issued a press release announcing a 2-for-1 stock split. That won't increase the company's market value, in the short term. But it does take the amount of shares houstanding to 31 million. EMCOR's board also increased the "authorized" number of shares from 30 million to 80 million, which means it might issue shares later (in exchange for an acquisition, for example).
Now, I know for certain that my pithy comment did not cause EMCOR's board to make this move. However, it's worth taking a second to note that the coincidence makes me look good!
15 Dec, 2005
This Just In . . . IES
Got this press release around 20 minutes ago . . . on Integrated Electrical Services:
Integrated Electrical Services Inc. Rating Lowered To 'CC', Removed From CreditWatch
NEW YORK Dec. 15, 2005--Standard & Poor's Ratings Services said today that it lowered its corporate credit rating on Houston, Texas-based Integrated Electrical Services Inc. (IES) to 'CC' from 'CCC-' and affirmed its 'C' rating on the company's senior subordinated notes. The ratings were removed from CreditWatch, where they were originally placed on May 19, 2005. The outlook is negative. At June 30, 2005, IES had approximately $223 million in total debt outstanding.
"The downgrade reflects the company's proposal with a committee of senior subordinated noteholders to undergo a capital restructuring, which also includes a Chapter 11 filing," said Standard & Poor's credit analyst James T. Siahaan.
The terms of this agreement in principle stipulate that noteholders would receive shares constituting 82% of the reorganized company in exchange for all of their notes, while existing shareholders and company management receive 15% and 3% of common shares, respectively.
The committee of senior subordinated noteholders represents approximately $101 million of the $173 million in principal amount of the notes. The approval of the plan requires the consent of at least two-thirds in the outstanding debt amount and one-half in the number of the senior subordinated noteholders.
IES expects to begin soliciting noteholder consent in January of 2006. If agreed to, the proposal would include the company's filing of a Chapter 11 reorganization so that it could exchange all of the senior subordinated notes for equity.
Once the appropriate consents are received and the restructuring is completed, Standard & Poor's will lower its corporate credit rating to 'D' and withdraw the ratings shortly thereafter.
IES is one of the larger contractors specializing in electrical engineering and construction projects in the U.S.
Obviously, something BIG happened. I looked for the IES release. Here it is, only 29 hours old - - -
Integrated Electrical Services Announces Agreement in Principle With Note Holders, Sale of Business Unit, and Postponement of Fiscal 2005 Form 10-K Filing
Wednesday December 14, 10:22 pm ET
* It has reached a non-binding agreement in principle with an ad hoc
committee, whose members hold a majority of the company's 9-3/8% senior
subordinated notes due 2009, for a proposed consensual restructuring of
the company's capital structure
* It has divested the majority of the assets of one of its commercial and
industrial business units based in South Carolina for a gross sales
price of $7.1 million
* It expects to file a Form 12b-25 with the SEC, which provides for a
fifteen day extension on filing its Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended
September, 30, 2005.
* It has rescheduled the release of its fiscal 2005 fourth quarter and
year end results.
RESTRUCTURING AGREEMENT IN PRINCIPLEAs previously announced, the company has engaged financial advisors to assist in the restructuring of its balance sheet. After discussions with an ad hoc committee of holders of approximately $101 million, or 58%, of its $173 million principal amount of senior subordinated notes, IES has reached a non-binding agreement in principle for a potential restructuring pursuant to which the senior subordinated noteholders would receive in exchange for all of their notes shares representing approximately 82% of the common stock of the reorganized company. Holders of IES' outstanding common stock and management would retain or receive shares representing approximately 15% and 3%, respectively, of the common stock of the reorganized company.
"We are delighted with this very important and positive step forward for our customers, suppliers and employees," said Byron Snyder, IES' president and chief executive officer. "This agreement in principle constitutes substantial progress in our continuing efforts to work to reduce our long term debt, the goal of which is to improve free cash flow, strengthen the balance sheet, enhance surety bonding capacity for our business and release unnecessary constraints on our companies to allow them to increase their business, operations and profitability. At the same time it is important to us that we continue to maintain good relationships with our vendors and suppliers. During this process we fully expect to continue to pay them in full in the ordinary course of business. We are pleased with the faith and support that our customers and suppliers continue to show in us and are pleased that we will be able to reward that support with new business and a new and improved IES."
The agreement in principle contemplates that the company's customers, vendors and trade creditors would not be impaired by the restructuring and would be paid in full in the ordinary course of business, and that the company's senior convertible notes, due 2014, with a current aggregate principal amount outstanding of approximately $50 million, would be reinstated or the holders otherwise provided the full value of their note claims. It is also contemplated that the company's senior bank credit facility would be reinstated or refinanced at the time of the restructuring. Discussions have already begun with the bank.
If the proposed restructuring were to be consummated, the proposed plan currently contemplates the filing of a pre-packaged Chapter 11 plan of reorganization in order to achieve the exchange of all of the senior subordinated notes for equity. Approval of a proposed plan in a pre-packaged proceeding would require the consent of the holders of at least two-thirds in claim amount and one-half in number of the senior subordinated notes that vote on the plan. The company would seek to enter into a plan support agreement with the members of the ad hoc committee and then formally solicit consents to the proposed restructuring from the holders of the senior subordinated notes. The company expects to begin the out-of-court solicitation process in January of 2006.
There is no assurance that the company will successfully complete the restructuring contemplated by the agreement in principle, or any other restructuring. At this time neither the agreement in principle nor any other proposed restructuring terms have been agreed to by the requisite holders of the senior subordinated notes, and the senior subordinated noteholders can withhold these consents for any or no reason. The agreement in principle is subject to the negotiation of definitive documentation, approval by the requisite noteholders and a court in a Chapter 11 proceeding and customary closing conditions. In addition, the company has previously announced that, as of December 5, 2005, the company's 30-trading day average stock price was below $1.00, that the company has failed or may fail to meet other published requirements for the continued listing of its common stock on the NYSE, including the exchange's market capitalization requirements, and that the NYSE may also consider de-listing the common stock, on a discretionary basis, other circumstances regarding the company's financial condition, including the company's filing of a Form 12b-25 discussed below and the possibility that the company may consummate the restructuring under the agreement in principle with the ad hoc committee of subordinated noteholders in a prepackaged Chapter 11 case. If the company's common stock is de-listed from the NYSE, the holders of the company's senior convertible notes would have the right to put their notes back to the company. The company would likely not be able to pay the principal and accrued interest on those notes if put to the company, and this could affect the success of any plan of reorganization contemplated by the company without an agreement with the holders of the senior convertible notes. Absent an agreement with the holders of the senior convertible notes to any pre-packaged Chapter 11 plan that may be filed, the company would seek to reinstate their notes or give them property equal to the full value of their note claims. The company does not presently have an agreement with any of the holders of the senior convertible notes to the agreement in principle or any other proposed restructuring plan. In the event the restructuring contemplated by the agreement in principle is not consummated, the company will evaluate other alternatives for restructuring its capital structure.
SALE OF BUSINESS UNIT
IES has completed its divestiture program with the sale of the majority of the assets of one of its commercial and industrial business units based in South Carolina for a sales price of approximately $7.1 million, including accounts receivable of approximately $1.3 million retained by IES, the collections of which are guaranteed by the buyer. This unit had net revenues of $39.6 million and operating income of $0.2 million in fiscal 2005. Since its announcement of the divestiture program in October 2004, IES has sold 14 units, primarily operating in the commercial/industrial market, for total cash proceeds of $56.2 million and retained receivables of $3.8 million and has closed two units. These 16 units had combined net revenues of $295.4 million and operating income of $11.4 million in fiscal 2004. The most recent sale marks the conclusion of the company's divestiture program.
FORM 10-K, EARNINGS RELEASE AND CONFERENCE CALL
The company also announced that it will delay the filing of its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005 with the SEC to allow additional time for the completion of its annual audit due to the company's inability to timely compile information necessary for the completion of the audit and complete the final assessments of its internal controls. The company intends to file a Form 12b-25 with the SEC, which provides for a 15-day extension of the deadline for filing its Form 10-K. The company expects to timely file its Form 10-K upon completion of its annual audit, within this 15-day extension period. IES has also rescheduled its earnings release and conference call. An announcement on the new schedule for each will be published at a later date.
Integrated Electrical Services, Inc. is a national provider of electrical solutions to the commercial and industrial, residential and service markets. The company offers electrical system design and installation, contract maintenance and service to large and small customers, including general contractors, developers and corporations of all sizes.
11 Dec, 2005
EMCOR Group
EMCOR Group is the largest
I've posted the company's recent 10Q for Q3 -- as filed with the SEC -- here. You might want to read it, to say you've looked at such a thing once; or you might want to think about this as the Exemplar for the EC industry; or you might (for all I know) want to buy the stock.
Before all else, know this: EMCOR is an odd company.
Exhibit A: Most electrical distributors complain that electrical contractors "use them as a bank" -- that is, they regularly delay payment. One reason, of course, is that the ECs don't get paid on a timely basis by their customers.
EMCOR is the proverbial Case In Point. It is the largest subcontractor in the
Q3 revenues: $1,215,415,000.
Accounts Receivable: $1,078,995,000 at 9/30/05.
One might calculate that the company has roughly 80 days' sales outstanding in AR. That is NOT en enviable number. I've followed the company for years; EMCOR's DSOs always are high. To my knowledge, it hasn't had to write off all that much AR in the past.
Exhibit B: The company has $1.785 billion of assets on its books. Subtract the $279 million of "goodwill," and you can net that down to $1.5 billion in assets. Against that, EMCOR Group has $1.4 million in debt.
That's not a typo. "Leverage" here is 1-to-100.
It's also not necessarily atypical of subcontractors. They can lease a good deal of their equipment; they don't need to own a great deal of assets.
In fact, subs normally don't go deeply into hock to buy anything. The exception, of course, came in the days of the roll-ups, when big subcontractors borrowed money to buy other contractors.
But there is a LOT wrong with EMCOR as a company with stock in public hands (at least, according to "the conventional wisdom") --
1 -- Construction company results tend to be "lumpy." One quarter surprises on the upside, big-time; a few quarters later, the roller coaster's flying downhill for all it's worth.
Stockholders, investors, and "institutions" don't like Lumpy. This has been seen – several times already – in the way investors treated the stock of Integrated Electrical Services (IES).
2 -- EMCOR's days' sales outstanding figure is scary, at least in comparison with other companies in which one might invest. If a given investor doesn't take the time to learn the construction subcontracting business (and why should he/she/it?) . . . the DSO figure screams "Lousy Management."
3 -- The complete lack of leverage on EMCOR's balance sheet is another glaring yellow-to-red light. If management is so damn good, why aren't they borrowing money to get bigger, grow faster - and drop more money to the bottom line? Going into hock is The American Way . . . ain't it?
4 -- Finally, EMCOR has only 16.6 million shares outstanding. That's it -- no preferred stock. Intel has 6 billion shares out. Check it out: Intel has roughly 9 times the sales of EMCOR -- but more than 350 times the number of shares! Key point: There aren't enough shares outstanding for EMCOR to attract major interest from the financial/investment community.
5 -- EMCOR's market value these days -- with its stock at $70.30 (close of 12/9) and 16.6 million shares = less than $1.2 billion. That's a price-to-sales ratio of around 0.25, if 2005 sales come in at about $4.6 billion.
Intel might well have $40 billion in 2005 revenue, with 6.03 billion shares outstanding. With the 12/9 close at $26.08, the company's market value is $157 billion.
The price-to-sales ratio for Intel, then, is 4.0 – or 16 times that of EMCOR.
EleBlog Perspective:
a. I don't give stock advice. The above is stuff you should think about. If you're moved to buy stock, download the EMCOR 10Q (see the link above). Then do even more research.
b. I don't own shares in EMCOR Group or any other company that I might write about in the course of covering the electrical, datacom, and construction sectors.
c. Truth be told, I own some long-term puts (LEAPs) on the stock of Intel. But my negative opinion on Intel is no reason for you to sell Intel stock, or short it, or buy puts, or do anything else. Of course, the above DOES talk about Intel, but it's in the context of presenting facts about EMCOR.
d. Finally: I think you can make a case that EMCOR’s growth prospects are actually better than those of Intel. That’s for another time; but think about it.
14 Nov, 2005
New King In Electrical Distribution
Wesco Distribution has "officially" jumped ahead of Graybar Electric. It's now the largest U.S.-based electrical distributor, as ranked by total sales. This "just" happened, in the 3rd quarter of 2005, and is documented in their 10-Q statements as filed with the SEC. You can download and view those statements on this site -- links below.
Here's the scoop:
9-month 2004 net sales: Graybar $3.0527 billion. Wesco $2.7533 billion.
9-month 2005 net sales: Wesco $3.1844 billion. Graybar $3.1677 billion.
The figures are not adjusted for anything (including non-electrical sales, non-U.S. sales, and acquisitions). Changes in the year-over-year period: Wesco, up 15.66%; Graybar, up 3.77%.
You can download the 10-Qs and nitpick the heck out of everything said above. Click here to download a PDF of the Wesco 10-Q for the 3rd quarter; click here to download the Graybar 10-Q for Q3.
(More)30 Sep, 2005
Graybar Describes Itself
Graybar is in the unique situation of having to file documents with the Securities & Exchange Commission, even tho the vast bulk of American citizens CAN'T buy stock in the company. The only folks who own Graybar stock are: (1) current Graybar employees, and (b) former Graybar employees (including retirees).
This is a miniscule slice of Americanoids. However, the SEC requires the company to file documents; I'm not really sure why.
News: On 8/29 Graybar filed a Form S-2 with the SEC. The company is registering 650K shares with the intent of selling them "to eligible employees and qualified retirees under the second-year offering pursuant to the Three-year Common Stock Purchase Plan."
What's the big deal about this?
1 -- We all should be so lucky as to own Graybar stock. The company has paid a 10% cash dividend for years. The only way I know of to get such a dividend via buying something in the open market is to buy RISKY (I can't emphasize that word enough) stocks.
[You know -- the yield on Russian government bonds is less than 10% (I'm not kidding). If you've seen Putin, read about his actions, and understand that he is a KGB product . . . well, buying Russian bonds seems to be a decent stretch beyond "risky"]
2 -- Despite the fact that it files quarterly (10-Q) and annual (10-K) statements -- just like Wesco and Grainger, which have stock in public hands -- Graybar doesn't necessarily overwhelm the world with information about itself. Most privately owned companies do not divulge reams of financial and operational data and strategies, and for good reason (they don't have to!).
3 -- You can access Graybar's filings on the SEC Web site. But this 87-page (490 KB) PDF document seemed important enough that I have posted it -- download by clicking here.
12 Sep, 2005
Crunch Time For Belden
Belden CDT filed its 10-Q (quarterly report) with the SEC on Aug. 8. I read it recently. It includes an "Outlook" section, from which I've copied this very interesting paragraph:
A major communications customer in Europe, sales to which generated 2004 revenues of $94.6 million, has requested bids from both the Company and several other suppliers on a supply agreement currently awarded to the Company. While the Company is aggressively bidding on the supply agreement, there can be no assurance that it will be successful in retaining some or all of this business. Should the Company lose some or all of this business, management believes the Company's operating results and cash flows would be adversely effected. The Company has not yet determined the impact that the potential loss of this business might have on its operating results and cash flows. If the Company were to retain some or all of the business, it would likely be at reduced prices. The Company will seek opportunities to reduce costs in order to minimize any adverse effect on operating results and cash flows, but there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in these efforts. [copy highlighted by EleBlog, not in the original]
On the other hand, four paragraphs later, it says:
The Company expects to recognize "sales incentive" compensation of up to $3.0 million in 2005 from a customer under a supply contract should the customer fail to meet purchasing targets. With respect to the customer's obligation for 2005, the Company received a $1.5 million prepayment in 2002 per the terms of the contract, which is reflected in accrued liabilities. The 2005 compensation could be reduced by the gross margin generated from the customer's purchases of certain products from the Company during 2005. [copy highlighted by EleBlog, not in the original]
If I understand this correctly: Belden CDT could get a $3 million payment from a customer for "nothing" (per a contract provision, Belden would give the customer zippo + the customer would fork over $3M!). I believe such contracts are called "take or pay" deals. I presume this deal is with a datacom distributor, but the counterparty is not revealed by Belden.
Question: Does a $3M payment on a take-or-pay deal offset the possible loss of $95M in sales in 2006?
Belden's 6-month results show $34.9M in operating income on $646.8M in sales. That's a "gross margin" of 5.4%. Normally, you'd say -- Belden wants both! But see the highlighted copy in the first excerpt -- Belden expects it would realize a lower profit ("reduced prices") if it keeps the biz from the European.
(More)06 Sep, 2005
Pike Electric's S-1
To get it, click here.
The thing is big & in HTML. I could not figure out how to get the graphics in the document -- they might be missing. The graphics were not elemental (in my opinion); they seemed to be there to add some visual appeal to one heck of a lot of words.
Why is this an "experiment?" If I decide I hate the way this looks and "feels," I'll educate myself on how to convert HTML to PDF and post only PDFs in the future.
Why is this here at all? I intend to make the EleBlog and www.electricalcontractor.com a comprehensive industry resource. Pike Electric is an important company in the electrical industry. The S-1/A is a legal, regulated document in which -- for the first time in its history -- Pike has had to set down in writing, for all to see, one heck of a lot of info about itself.
I don't know that the document is earth-shaking. But I do intend to post a number of SEC filings on this site -- with commentary.


