27 Feb, 2008

Commercial In Jeopardy

Posted by jsalimando 02:52 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Economic Thoughts
Here's what Morgan Stanley's Richard Berner -- an economist, I think -- posted to the company's Global Economic Forum on 2/19. I've taken the liberty of posting the whole comment, as (a) it backs up what I've been thinking and even posting here, and (b) hey, it might be an accurate outlook.

Recession is about to claim its next victim: Commercial construction. A downturn in such activity would represent a significant turnaround from last year’s boom: Although nonresidential or structures investment accounted for only 3.4% of (nominal) GDP, the 16% jump in real outlays contributed half a point to overall real GDP growth over the four quarters of 2007. Such a gain — the sharpest 4-quarter rise since 1984 — is unsustainable, and we think this economic asset is about to turn into a liability. Tighter financial conditions, uncertain tenancy, rents, and property values all will contribute to a downturn in office, retail and warehouse activity. Soaring construction costs are also a negative. Weakness is already showing: Nonresidential construction starts tumbled 13% from a year ago in January, according to Reed Construction Data.

Despite these hurdles, we think that the contraction in outlays will be shallow by historical comparison. The key factor limiting the downturn in traditional commercial construction is that the overall growth in supply for much of this expansion has been modest by historical standards. The “capital discipline” theme that governed corporate spending in this expansion partly extended to construction as well. For example, commercial construction excluding healthcare facilities rose by only 3.9% annualized over the past five years.

But discipline seems to have faded over the past year, when construction accelerated in virtually all categories, and with the slowdown in business activity, vacancy rates have begun to rise. There are clear pockets of excess in financial services office building and in retail and lodging. A slowdown in office employment and shakeouts in retail and wholesale activity may pressure rents just as lenders and investors tighten credit availability and raise its price. However, mining, power, and healthcare construction may buck the trend.

Because nonresidential construction includes a broad variety of structures, it’s important to distinguish among them to assess vulnerability. In my view, the commercial, lodging, manufacturing, and amusement areas, comprising 45% of total nonresidential outlays, are the most vulnerable to the forces described above. Commercial building proper — including offices, facilities for retailers, restaurants and warehouses — accounted for 28.8% of private nonresidential outlays last year, and hotels, amusements, and manufacturing consumed 7.6%, 2.4% and 6.1% of outlays, respectively. Two other categories were much bigger than these last three, and look much less vulnerable: Spending on power generation and communications structures represented 12.2%, while mining and exploration accounted for fully one-quarter of the total. Slower growth is likely; annualized gains in those two infrastructure components of 16.6% and 17.9% over the past two years are unsustainable. But given the needs, downturns seem unlikely. Religious, educational and farm spending made up the remainder.

The tightening in financial conditions for commercial real estate is manifest both in reduced availability and in higher cost of credit. Regarding availability, according to the Fed’s January Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey of 56 domestic banks and 23 foreign-owned banking institutions, some 80% of domestic banks reported tightening their lending standards on commercial real estate loans over the past three months— the highest since the Fed introduced this question in 1990. Most banks in the latest survey said that they had required higher debt service coverage ratios and lower loan-to-value ratios on commercial real estate loans in 2007, and nearly half reduced the maximum loan sizes that they were willing to grant over the past twelve months. Further stark evidence of the evaporation of credit availability comes from the securitization market: Until last week, no commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) had been issued so far this year —the longest such dry spell since October 1990.

Indeed, the CMBS market has been under intense pressure so far this year. Spreads for the highest-quality names at the top of the capital structure (AAA super senior securities) have widened by 100 bp or more to 225-240 bp over Libor just in the past month. The buyers’ strike in the CMBS market is understandable: Investors are afraid that a recession will trigger soaring delinquencies and defaults. Several years of rising property values convinced issuers to add leverage to their operations, and encouraged the rating agencies to maintain or boost ratings based on property values rather than the ability of cash flows to cover debt service. As a result, investors see CMBS as much more vulnerable to losses than in the past.

Beyond the tightening in financial conditions, the fundamental outlook is darkening for commercial construction. Tenancy, rents and property values all face a highly uncertain economic and financial backdrop. Office employment growth has decelerated over the past two years from 2.6% to 1.8%, and further declines seem likely. Retailing is clearly under pressure as consumers trim spending gains. And some large hotel chains are lowering their expectations for revenue per available room (REVPAR) this year. On the supply side, real outlays for office construction rose at an 18.6% annual rate over the past two years. In the fourth quarter alone, more than 19 million square feet of new office space came on the market according to Reis, Inc., the most since the fourth quarter of 2000. In 2008 Reis expects about 75 million square feet of new office space to come online in the 79 markets it tracks, up from 53 million square feet finished in 2007. Real construction spending for multi-merchandise shopping and lodging increased 10.3% and 53.7%, respectively, over the past 8 quarters.

The emerging imbalance between supply and demand is beginning to show up in rising vacancy rates. The national office vacancy rate rose to 12.6% in the fourth quarter — the first increase in four years. Some markets are still strong. Effective rents in Boston jumped 4.9% in the fourth quarter, and in New York City, they rose by 3.9%. But vacancy rates jumped by 1.9 percentage points in San Bernardino/Riverside, California; 1.7 pp in Orange County, Calif. and Fort Lauderdale; and 1.6 pp in Las Vegas. Smaller increases were evident in Salt Lake City, Tacoma, Austin, Hartford, Phoenix and the Maryland suburbs of Washington. Vacancy rates don’t yet reflect sublease space coming available as mortgage lenders go out of business. They will soon.

As if those imbalances weren’t enough, construction costs are soaring. True, the overall price index for nonresidential construction in the National Income and Product Accounts rose by just 5.1% last year following two years of double-digit gains. This deceleration may not last, as steel and copper prices are rising again. Domestic mills are hiking steel quotes, reflecting supply problems, increased exports, and limited imports. Copper futures jumped to $3.62 per pound last week, 20% higher than a month ago. The International Copper Study Group reports that global copper consumption rose 7.2% in the first 10 months of last year. Severe snowstorms in China might have disrupted copper production there. Rising energy costs, especially for diesel fuel, are also contributing to the surge in overall construction costs. Such price hikes are driving up costs and hurting builders’ budgets, and thus will be another hurdle to construction activity this year.

For investors in the CMBS market, the battering in values over the past two months must seem reminiscent of the subprime meltdown. CMBS spreads are now pricing in significant weakness in real estate fundamentals bordering on a record-setting collapse. We disagree with this outlook. Defaults will rise over the next two years, especially where leverage is excessive, but they aren’t likely to be as severe as in 1990. Thus, we think that the CMBS market is oversold, especially at the top of the capital structure. According to Ahsim Khan of Morgan Stanley’s CMBS trading unit, based on historical loss severities, virtually every loan in AAA super senior CMBS would have to default for the securities to default That seems highly unlikely.

Downside risks predominate for construction activity, reflecting the tightening in financial conditions. The uncertain economic and financial backdrop may mean that lenders will tighten further. But while the credit cycle is only beginning, and buyers should be selective, investors may look back on this episode as a reasonable buying opportunity in the highest-quality securities. That’s especially the case as the market forces discipline on developers by cutting new construction and thus supply.

27 Feb, 2008

Rebate vs. Housing

Posted by jsalimando 02:30 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Economic Thoughts
What became apparent (to me, today) is that the future direction of the economy is going to depend on how average people "feel" as they get their rebate checks from the fedgov in the coming months.

I saw a couple of talking heads on CNBC this morning saying that the rebate checks would boost GDP. Maybe. It's hard to imagine $150 billion having a big impact in a $13 trillion economy. If 70% of GDP is in the consumer sector, then the consumer piece is $9 trillion.

Does $150 billion add up to a bigger percentage of $9 trillion than I think? It's 1.67%.

Let's forget math for a moment. I think the continuing (and worsening?) housing decline could completely override whatever "good feeling" $150 billion engenders. This Reuters report -- on Economy.com data -- is positively frightening:

One-tenth of U.S. homeowners hold mortgages that are larger than the worth of their homes, Moody's Economy.com said on Friday.

Nearly 8.8 million homeowners, or 10.3 percent, are in over their heads, its chief economist, Mark Zandi, estimates.

As a result, millions of U.S. homeowners have the incentive to abandon their properties.

Now, add to that these facts:

a. As posted here earlier, Kasriel of Northern Trust computes that a 21.7% decline in housing prices is likely before the worst is over.

b. As of 12/31/07, we'd seen only 8% of that decline.

c. Add in this (from a Marketwatch.com report)

"Ceaseless talk of a recession continues to dampen the mood of consumers in general, whether or not a recession actually occurs. For home buyers, we believe this drumbeat, coupled with concerns over mortgages, the direction of home prices, and foreclosures, has kept pent-up demand on the sidelines," said Robert I. Toll, chairman and chief executive, in a statement.

EleBlog take: If Economy.com is correct (and I've previously said that Mark Zandi of that site is one of my favorite economists), and Kasriel is right, we could well be headed to a situation in which 15% or 20% of American homeowners -- perhaps 15 million families -- owe more on their mortgages than the houses in which they live are worth. People are not stupid. Handing someone in such a situation a check for $1,000 isn't going to materially improve his perception of his own situation.

. . . especially if his neighbor gets laid off (which might happen in a recession).

It's possible that many people getting these rebate things will -- FINALLY -- do something prudent, and either pay use them to pay off credit card debt, put money away for a rainy day, drop it into an account for the kid's future education, or pay down the debt on the car (a lot of people are "upside down" on their car loans, too).

While I am sure that these things are "the right thing to do" -- for smart people -- and I AM sure these things would be good (in the long term) for the economy, I don't think they help stave off a recession.

Of course, I could be wrong. Perhaps 85% of the foks who get the money will run out and spend it. That still seems like a drop in the bucket to me!




 (More)

27 Feb, 2008

Greener Network Cabling

Posted by jsalimando 02:21 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Datacom/VDV
Supplier Siemon (no, NOT Siemens!) has launched a web resource dedicated to "A Greener Approach to Network Cabling."

I've been discussing with folks that there is a LOT more to green in the electrical/datacom contracting industry than just retrofitting CFLs for incandescent light bulbs. One thing that caught my eye on the Siemon page: Siemon's 2009 catalog program reduces paper usage by over 40%.



27 Feb, 2008

What Pike Said

Posted by jsalimando 02:10 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Company Docs + Comments
Pike Electric Corp. is a non-union electrical contractor that (a) specializes in powerline work, and (b) has stock (symbol PEC) trades on a public exchange. On 1/31 the company held its quarterly earnings phone call with analysts. Thanks to SeekingAlpha.com, a site of which I am increasingly fond, the transcript of the call is available at no charge. The thing weighs in at about 5,000 words.

Here's a piece that I thought interesting -- initial comments by Anthony Slater, CFo. The "Eric" he references is Eric Pike, CEO.

Core power line billable hours decreased approximately 14.1% year-over-year, the decline in billable hours was due to the reduction in headcount as a result of exiting certain contracts and the moderation in our customers demand. In addition to increases in storm restoration work which diverted some core power line revenues. Revenue generated in the second quarter of fiscal 2007 from exited accounts totaled $8 million. Excluding revenue from exited accounts, core power line revenue decreased 2.2%. Storm restoration revenues totaled $19.6 million, a 39.3% increase from $14.1 million for the comparable quarter last year.

As Eric mentioned, winter storms in the mid West and mid Atlantic regions drove demand for our storm work in the quarter. Gross profit for the second quarter was $24.5 million or 17.1% of revenue compared to $24.5 million or 16.5% of revenue for the second quarter last year. The 60-basis point year-over-year improvement in gross margins was due to a number of factors. As with previous quarter, gross margins continued to benefit from operational efficiencies as well as the prior elimination of certain lower margin accounts and more favorable pricing which we achieved in the latter part of 2007. In addition, a greater contribution from higher margin storm revenues also contributed to the increase in the quarter.

These factors were partially offset by a $500,000.00 investment in retardant uniform shirts.

EleBlog notes:

1 -- Pike didn't do so well in the most recent quarter, whereas Quanta Services had a spectacular 90 days. One difference: Quanta bought InfraSource Services. Also, Pike is smaller.

2 -- Investing in Quanta or Pike (or any other powerline contractor, if any come public) is certainly chancy. Revenues soar when there are destructive hurricanes. No storms = revenue drops. The company managers have to cope with both conditions: Staffing up to meet storm-generated demand isn't easy; ramping things down when no significant storms materialize (as was the case for much of 2007) isn't a simple thing, either.

3 -- Note that last sentence -- the half-a-million-dollar investment in PPE (personal protective equipment).

27 Feb, 2008

Hybrids + Batteries

Posted by jsalimando 02:03 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Scene + Herd
As long as I'm linking to FinancialSense.com, I've saved a snippet from an August 2007 "broadcast" (Puplava does one every Saturday, and they are generally interesting). It's about the mathematics of the hybrid autos now on the market. Again, "Jim" is Puplava; John is his regular Saturday-broadcast sidekick.

JOHN: I would say that the consumer is starting to feel it but we haven’t hit that pain threshold where they will say, “that’s it, we’re just not driving any more, we’re doing something different.”

Again, for investment, yes, say you could buy a Toyota Prius or something like that, but the real issue is that going to solve the problem? You know, in 100,000 miles you’re going to have to replace a very expensive battery bank. And so ultimately, when you look at your cost savings, there really isn’t a cost saving over the long run for that type of vehicle.

JIM: Yeah, that’s one of the problems they have with hybrids, some of those batteries. I was talking with somebody at the Mercedes dealership. Mercedes sales really took off in the late 80s because of their diesel cars. They could get this 30 miles, 40 miles; and then all of a sudden the price of gasoline went down. And when I talked to the Mercedes people, I asked, “how come you guys never came out with a hybrid?” And that was one of the things that they mentioned, “we looked at that, but the battery bank is so expensive that you’re going to look at 7 to 10,000 dollars and replacing those batteries versus let’s say the diesel Mercedes, 200,000 miles. [25:25]

JOHN: When you factor it all out over a hundred, 200,000 miles there is no net savings. That’s the point. And we don’t have the hybrids to the level whereby you can take it home and plug it in to an external port outside your house and charge it off cheap electricity generated by the things we’ve talked about before. That’s not there yet.

EleBlog take: A couple of points:

1 -- why isn't there more use of diesel in the U.S.? Diesel is more fuel-efficient than gasoline.

2 -- what's being discussed in the last sentences is the PHEV -- the plug-in hybrid electric vehicle. If you look back to earlier this month, the EleBlog ran a link to a speech from the EEI's chief on the future of electricity . . . which included PHEVs as #1 on the future agenda.

27 Feb, 2008

Energy Roundtable

Posted by jsalimando 01:55 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Reports + Summaries
The website Financial Sense.com held an energy roundtable on 2/02/08, featuring Matthew Simmons, author of Twlight in the Desert -- a oil industry investment banker who has provided details that feed the Peak Oil hypothesis. There are two other participants.

Note that the roundtable runs more than 10,000 words. You can choose to listen to it instead (it's available in four modes -- see the top of the page).

Here's a key piece of the roundtable. Jim is Jim Puplava, host of the roundtable (and the site). Matt is Simmons, of course. CERA = Cambridge Energy Research Associates, an energy industry consulting firm:

JIM: Something that does not get enough play in my opinion is depletion. I mean we saw the CERA report that came out a couple of weeks ago that said that world oil depletion was 4 ½% a year or about 4 million barrels that we need to find just to stay in place. And yet we know the large oil fields – Cantarell, North Sea, North Slope – the depletion rates there are much higher.

Matt, you looked at the world’s oil fields and came up with some different conclusions than the optimistic CERA report. Were you guys looking at different data because...

MATT: I don’t have any idea. I’m very puzzled with that report. They lay out, without any names, some very specific numbers and in the number of fields they say they’re looking at and how much those fields collectively add up to. And what puzzles me is that they say they have 811 fields in their database – in their proprietary database – and that 400 of the 811 are all giant oil fields accounting for about almost 50% of world production, which means that they would have to average 90,000 barrels a day per field.

Well, when I went through last – in the fall of 2001, one of the more enjoyable treasure hunts I’ve done because I got more and more intrigued by no one seems to have a list of the top 20 or 30 or 40 oil fields. So I decided to put a cut-off of 100,000 barrels a day as my definition of anything over that is a giant oil field. And I searched far and wide and in fact at one point we spent a fair amount of money buying 34 fields from the IHS database because even the CIA didn’t have any field production out of Russia. They didn’t even know the names anymore.

So at any rate, I finally got this, added it all up, put in a pretty extensive white paper and then circulated that to hundreds and hundreds of people that might know, and saying that “I’m going to republish when I get some better data or if you think x field is producing less or more, please let me know.” That got unbelievably widely praised as the first study that anyone had done maybe ever on oil fields – not by their reserves but by their production.

And I came up with 110 that accounted for 90% of our current production, so how you could find 400 that were 49%. Something had to be totally wrong with the study I did. I mean vastly wrong.

FinancialSense.com also has "an interview with Matthew Simmons," which weighs in at only 3,500+ words -- a column from CaseyResearch.com which consists of a Q&A with Simmons. It was posted 1/9/08.

With crude oil prices above $101/barrel at this moment, it might be a good time to listen to/read Simmons. Folks who have listened to him have guessed right on the direction of oil prices . . . even as we (apparently) verge upon entering a recession.

26 Feb, 2008

AIA Index Drops 'Precipitously'

Posted by jsalimando 03:47 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Current Data
From an American Institute of Architects release:

Following a stretch of 3 months with an increase in demand for design services, the Architecture Billings Index (ABI) dropped precipitously in January. As a leading economic indicator of construction activity, the ABI shows an approximate nine to twelve month lag time between architecture billings and construction spending. The American Institute of Architects (AIA) reported the January ABI rating was 50.7, down sharply from the 55.0* mark in December (any score above 50 indicates an increase in billings), and inquiries for new projects was 59.5. [emphasis added by EleBlog]

* Every January the AIA research department uses a formula from the Department of Commerce that re-estimates ABI data based on seasonal factors resulting in a recalibration of recent figures.

“Given the concerns about condition of the overall economy, coupled with a suffering housing market, it is not surprising to see a falloff in demand for architectural services.” said AIA Chief Economist Kermit Baker, PhD, Hon. AIA. “This is likely to affect firms that specialize in commercial and industrial projects the most because businesses are expressing growing anxiety over a potential recession and are cutting back on plans for expansion.”

NOTE: This is a NON-residential index. The AIA has a separate quarterly report on residential, but the ABI omits that stuff.

Here's the graphic AIA provided in its weekly online newsletter (2/22/08 edition), which provides more information -- including a graphic on the % of architecture firms using BIM these days:



 (More)

26 Feb, 2008

Housing Price Fall (?)

Posted by jsalimando 02:26 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Economic Thoughts
Paul Kasriel of Northern Trust is probably the one economist I follow most closely -- whether I agree with him or not. [I also follow Paul Krugman of the New York Times closely -- but he's a liberal, and I typically agree with him].

Unfortunately, I don't get the chance to read Kasriel's stuff as it's posted to the web (here) -- so right now I'm involved in catching up with stuff he (and others at his shop) have written going back to December.

His Dec. 17th "Econtrarian" column included the graphic and comments below:


To get some idea how much the price of your house might fall, consider the implications of how much the price of your house has risen relative to your income (Chart 8). Between 1980 and 2000, the price of your house averaged about 337% of your income.

Then, according to former Fed Chairman Greenspan, came the delayed effect of the fall of the Berlin Wall, and the price of your house soared to 469% of your income – a record high for the 1968 through 2006 period. Assuming, optimistically, that your income increases by 4.05% in 2007 and 2008, the rate at which your income increased in 2006, by what percentage would the price of your house have to fall from its 2006 level to get the price/income ratio back to 337% average in 2008?

The answer is 21.7%.

From 1968 through 2006, the median price of an existing home never fell on a year-to-year basis. So, we are in uncharted waters here.

EleBlog take: According to the economists I saw at the NAHB press conference on 2/13/08, housing prices were down (national average) about 8% in 2007. If Kasriel's figuring above is somehow related to reality, we're not yet halfway home.

25 Feb, 2008

Pre-Fab Conduit

Posted by jsalimando 01:24 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Pre-Fab + etc.
An article in California Builder & Engineer talks about a Skanska project. The article starts with info about "morning group-stretching exercises," which apparently have reduced soft-tissue injuries. I'm not dismissing this piece of the article -- it's interesting.

According to the article, Skanska has implemented this pre-work stretching thing on all of its projects across the U.S.

- - - - -

Then the 964-word piece gets to Rosendin Electric and pre-fab. As regular visitors know, I've become enthusiastic about construction pre-fabrication (adding a category on that this year, in which this is the 10th post in two months):

"We have used 1,500 linear feet of pre-fabricated conduit duct bank. It was configured on-grade, at eye level, rather than having to work at connecting it in a 6-foot trench. This has saved our construction efforts a significant amount of time on this project," he said. The pre-fab conduits are in clusters ranging from three conduits up to 20 conduits in 40-foot sections.

Parker foresees the construction industry moving more in the direction of pre-fabrication. "Now that we have computer modeling/designing, we are able to look at individual components of construction. Rosendin Electric, our electrical subcontractor, was able to model from the computer, and from the model build templates by which to pre-fabricate things."



25 Feb, 2008

Electricity Industry Transformation (?)

Posted by jsalimando 01:18 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Scene + Herd
Which "electricity industry?" The utility biz. The "transformation" was seen by Tom Kuhn, president of the Edison Electric Institute -- the association of IOUs (investor-owned utilities) in a "state of the industry" speech (apparently an annual thing). See a release on the thing here or download a PDF of the speech itself here.

From the press release: I've been telling people that PHEVs are moving higher on the U.S. utility agenda. Here's more evidence:

Kuhn said the widespread commercialization of plug-in hybrid vehicles stands to play a significant role in reducing the carbon footprint, with electric utilities playing an important role. "A recent comprehensive study by the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) and the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) found that the emergence of plug-in hybrids would result in significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and improve overall air quality with only a small increase in electricity demand. Plug-in hybrids have the further benefit of adding to our nation's energy security as well," he said.

25 Feb, 2008

Power Prices: HIGHER

Posted by jsalimando 01:13 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Scene + Herd
A 2/14 Dallas Morning News article offers coverage of a conference on energy's future sponsored by CERA, the energy consulting firm (famous name: Daniel Yergin). The message: Higher electricity prices. From the article:

“I don’t see pricing going down anytime in the near future."

“Just about all signs point to higher power prices for many years to come."

And then there's this:


In past decades state regulators have funded some efficiency projects, by paying for upgrades or reminding people to turn the lights off. Some executives say this approach is all wrong.

James Rogers, chief executive of Duke Energy Corp., said most people don’t think about their utility bills all the time.

“It’s back of mind. We spend a lot of money trying to make it front of mind, and that’s a failed approach,” he said.

He’d prefer to see regulators come up with a way to pay utilities for saving a kilowatt of power, rather than just for producing a kilowatt of power.



25 Feb, 2008

Phantom Loads

Posted by jsalimando 01:09 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Scene + Herd
A blog from CMP (the tech magazine publisher) called "No Jitter" offered good thoughts on "phantom loads" in a 2/19 post. What the heck is a phantom load? It's the electricity your stuff is using after you think you've turned everything off. From the blog:

Because OFF doesn’t always mean OFF, a huge amount of energy is being wasted by phantom loads. For individuals the cost of phantom loads just for a resident may add between $7-20 to their monthly utility cost. Considering all users- residential or commercial, there’s an opportunity to design products differently to reduce and even eliminate phantom loads. Wasted power caused by phantom loads account for as much as 15% of the bill and perhaps even higher in office environments.

25 Feb, 2008

Spam Works

Posted by jsalimando 01:05 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Off The Pathen Beat
Have you ever wondered why there is so much junk e-mail? My assumption has been, for years, that the explanation is simple -- It Works. That is to say, some idiot is out there clicking on the e-mailed ad that promises to add 18 inches the size of his private member; or (Worse) someone is sending his personal information out there to someone from Nigeria who wants to help make him rich.

Well, now someone has done a study and found:

50% of those surveyed have "checked their junk mail oin a daily basis"

. . . and, much worse

16% have made a purchase in the past year as the result of opening a marketing e-mail solicitation.

I believe this means it will NEVER end.

25 Feb, 2008

Green: Audio + PDF

Posted by jsalimando 01:00 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Intelligent Buildings
A report from PricewaterhouseCoopers - a consulting firm -- is titled "Going Green: Sustainable growth strategies." The thing is available as a 2.2MB PDF -- and you can listen to (or download) a 4.8MB podcast.

The 74p PDF includes a lot to think about -- whether you work for a corporation or just buy stuff. Consider this snippet:

A significant risk in all of this is the potential
for members of the industry to portray
products as green when they really aren’t.
That’s why it is “just so important,” says
Teradata’s Gnau, that companies actually
“deliver” on their promises. “If you say it is
green, then you should be able to pin that on
something measurable,” says Gnau. “If you
just slap a green label on a product when it
doesn’t deserve it, people will see through
that very quickly, and it will hurt you in the
long run.”

25 Feb, 2008

'Secret' Benefits of Energy Conservation

Posted by jsalimando 00:57 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Intelligent Buildings
Industry Week magazine posted earlier this month a 1,495-word "viewpoint" piece -- "The Secret Benefits of Energy Conservation." Keep in mind that this B2B weekly is aimed at the U.S. manufacturer. The article discusses SIX "non-utility" benefits (i.e., benefits of saving energy beyond the $$$ savings):

A. extended equipment life;
B. reduced maintenance costs;
C. reduced risk to energy supply price spikes; and
D. the ability to sell carbon credits.

E. enhanced public image; and
F. reduced risk to environmental/legal costs.


This article is worth reading, and worth calling to the attention of others.

22 Feb, 2008

'Free' Energy for 'Tiny Gadgets'

Posted by jsalimando 01:31 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Intelligent Buildings
I am a big fan of science publications -- a hobby. I read Scientific American (as much of it as I can understand), which is a monthly; I also subscribe to (and read all of) Science News and New Scientist (which is published out of England).

Back in June, I clipped an article: "Powering The Revolutin: Tiny gadgets pick up energy for free." It's about "harvesting" of vibrations to power small devices; I'd actually heard of this before I read about it, in one or more presentations about wireless devices.

The problem with wireless devices (I learned in those presentations) was that they needed power to work, and would eventually -- perhaps every 5 years -- need to have their batteries replaced. Proponents of such devices realized that was going to be BAD, as they hoped to have so many wireless items out in the world that replacing the batteries would become a major Pain In The Butt.

So . . . how about this? Many wireless devices are attached to walls. Walls naturally vibrate. How about harvesting the energy from the vibrations to power the devices? OF COURSE, there's not a lot of energy in those vibrations. But the devices didn't NEED that much energy!!!

Read this 2,159-word story, originally published 6/2/07 in Science News, for a lot more.

[Yes, this kind of "goes with" the knee-brace/energy story that ran a few days ago . . . that's what made me think of this article and go looking for it]

22 Feb, 2008

Top Automation Suppliers

Posted by jsalimando 01:27 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Audio & Video
Jim Pinto, who is a savvy commentator on the industrial automation business, in his 2/8/08 report (#243), notes and comments on the Top Automation Companies. Beyond the table below (which comes from his site), he offers opinions on the CONTROL magazine list of the "Top 50 Automation Vendors" -- and other stuff. Jim's definitely worth a read; if you like his stuff, note that you can subscribe (FREE).

Note also that JimPinto.com eNews #243 is posted as a podcast as well.

Company Global N. America
Siemens 1 6
ABB 2 3
Schneider 3 5
Emerson Process 4 1
Rockwell Automation 5 2
Honeywell Process 6 4
Yokogawa 7 19
Omron 8 18
Invensys 9 8
Mitsubishi 10 28
GE 11 7
Danaher 12 9


22 Feb, 2008

Peak Oil Outlook

Posted by jsalimando 01:14 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Economic Thoughts
A post on SeekingAlpha.com (a site on which I am increasingly relying, by the way) purports to look at "the next five years" of Peak Oil developments. It offered two charts, of which the prettiest is below:



This chart is from Matthew Simmons, apparently. I've been a big fan of his ever since reading his (incredibly detailed) book -- Twilight In The Desert . . . which is about the realities of the future of oil production in Saudi Arabia (based on research, not mouthing off!).

From the SeekingAlpha.com piece's conclusion:

Simmons maintains that the difference between peak oil believers and peak oil optimists is that the former focus on flow rates and the latter on hydrocarbons in the ground. Industry people tend to believe that there are plenty of hydrocarbons around and increasing flow rates is a relatively straightforward matter of applying sufficient capital to get the hydrocarbons into production and that higher oil prices will do the trick.

The clear implications of the graph of IEA projected flows and the actually less optimistic graph by Sadad Al-Husseini - neither of which are thought of as peak oil adherents - is that there will be a serious supply problem by 2011.

EleBog take: This is going to -- eventually -- accelerate the government's role in our lives (on the energy side, at least) . . . and electricity's role in transportation. Among other things, the likely end results (by 2015 or long before) will include:

1 -- government regulation of how existing buildings are run and how much energy they use. Right now, many cities are putting regulations into place requiring that newly constructed buildings be "Green" and featured reduced energy use (lower energy use per sq. ft.). But the opportunity to make an impact on this is in EXISTING buildings . . . I gave a presentation yesterday, for example, that said there are 5M existing buildings, of which only 10% have direct digital control of their HVAC systems.

2 -- I also see an incredible boom in PHEVs -- plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. This will enable people doing "in-town" driving to use electricity to power their cars.

There's more. We'll get to it over time. One thing is certain: If oil is $100 a barrel today -- which a quasi-recession going on in the U.S. -- we can't imagine what the price will be (given that the details in the SeekingAlpha.com piece becomes facts over time). $150 a barrel? $200 a barrel? What's your guess for 2012?

22 Feb, 2008

Iron Prices to Soar

Posted by jsalimando 01:11 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Current Data
One worry -- whether there is a recession or not -- is inflation. According to an item on the blog CEO Economic Update, iron ore prices are high -- and going much higher. Saith the blogger:

From the macro standpoint such a bold price hike on such a basic commodity will send shock waves throughout the supply chain. I can't think of anything except water and oil, that have the broad stroke importance of iron.

22 Feb, 2008

Copper Surprise

Posted by jsalimando 00:57 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Current Data
According to the London Metal Exchange, the "unofficial" closing price yesterday (TH 2/21/08) was $3.81 per pound. I don't think anyone expected this. Only a week ago, Tom Stundza -- a very fine business reporter for Purchasing.com -- penned an article that ran under the headline "Copper outlook for 2008 is a fourth year of reduced demand."

An old saying: "Copper is the metal with a Ph.D in Economics." If copper's price is telling us something, it's that there is no damn recession (at least worldwide) right about now!

To check copper prices today (any day) -- go here.

20 Feb, 2008

Cabling Basics (Resi)

Posted by jsalimando 08:51 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Datacom/VDV
Residential Systems magazine has a Tips & Techniques series going. I downloaded a 2-page "basics of residential structured cabling" PDF from the home page, which included this graphic:



20 Feb, 2008

Jan. Construction Starts

Posted by jsalimando 07:50 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Current Data
DISCONNECT: McGraw-Hill Construction's report on the $ value of construction starts show them up 8%. Here's the first paragraph of the report (find it here):

New construction starts increased 8% in January to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $551.3 billion, according to McGraw-Hill Construction, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies. After a weak December, substantial gains were reported for nonresidential building and nonbuilding construction (public works and electric utilities), as both of these major sectors were lifted by the start of several very large projects.

In contrast, residential building witnessed further erosion in January, continuing the steady downward trend that has been present over the past two years.

OK. Then I page down to the bottom of the page (as always) -- to find the UNadjusted data. These are the raw data gathered by McGraw-Hill; the dollar figures are in Billions:


YEAR-TO-DATE CONSTRUCTION STARTS
Unadjusted Totals, In Millions of Dollars

1 Mos. 2008

1 Mos. 2007

% Change

Nonresidential Building

$16,488

$15,878

+4

Residential Building

12,876

21,932

-41

Nonbuilding Construction

9,758

10,393

-6

Total Construction

$39,122

$48,203

-19


What do you notice? Well, nonresidential IS up, isn't it? But the CRATER that residential construction is leaving for us is stunning. It's huge. It's astounding.

MOST IMPORTANTLY (to the EleBlog) . . . nonbuilding construction is down. Hey, local tax dollars are declining.

I'm not sure how a 19% decline in total construction gets teased into an 8% "seasonally adjusted" increase. I'm nowhere near as smart as Bob Murray, the chief economist for MHC.

But for now, I'm going to go with the table that MHC provides, rather than the adjusted data. BOTTOM LINE: This is NOT a good report!

20 Feb, 2008

Convergence: Green, Sex + LEDs

Posted by jsalimando 07:35 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Off The Pathen Beat
"Knee Brace Generates Electricity From Walking" is just the latest (2/13) in a series of stories about harvesting energy from sources other than power plants (small or large). I like the idea that you can take a walk and recharge your cell phone or GPS.

I also like the quote: "There is power to be harvested from various places in the body." Here's what it took me:

- - - - -

I expect the future to bring "GREEN Sex" advertisements . . . it's the ultimate Convergence:

" . . . use Viagra, have copious amounts of nonstop sex AND at the same time generate enough electricity to power all of the LEDs in your house for a week

". . . save enough money to pay for your pills!"

Headline: Light Up Your Life -- In More Ways Than One!

I'm not kidding!



20 Feb, 2008

Electrical System Info

Posted by jsalimando 07:22 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Scene + Herd
"Hard to Find Information About Distribution Systems" is a 2-piece (both PDFs) -- FREE -- agglomeration of information from a guy name of Jim Burke. Mike Holt recently distributed links to these two PDFs via his newsletter -- so all credit to Jim and Mike. I'm just helping out!

Part One -- 123 pages.

Part Two - 28 pages.

DISCLAIMER: I take no responsibility for the information presented; verify before using it!

Here's Jim Burke's preface (bolding from Joe):

There have been little tidbits of information I have accumulated over the past 40 years that have helped me understand and analyze distribution systems. I have pinned them to my wall, taped them to my computer, stuffed them in my wallet and alas, copied them for my students.

Much of them are hard, if not impossible, to find in any reference book. A large percentage of them could also be classified as personal opinion so they should be used carefully. For whatever, I hope they are as useful to you as they have been to me.

Over the many years, this document has taken on a life of its own. There have been many suggestions and much help from so many distribution engineers that it is impossible to thank all of you. From the new topics such as “stray voltage” and “grounding” to the many surveys we’ve all done together (lightning, loading, etc) and finally the less serious sections like “Ways We Scare Ourselves” and “Airline Cabin Announcements”, this has been a lot of fun to work on.

20 Feb, 2008

Copper Says No Recession....

Posted by jsalimando 07:17 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Current Data
Is there a recession, or ain't there?

Copper says there isn't (so, for that matter, does the price of oil).

Here -- from www.kitcometals.com -- is the past 24 hours of copper prices. The damn thing hit $3.70 per pound today. That's a lot closer to the near-$4.00 high of April 2006 than it is to some kind of recession low!!!



20 Feb, 2008

What The EC Can/Can't Do

Posted by jsalimando 06:53 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Lighting
A Q+A piece in Professional Remodeler magazine's 2/08 issue deals with what some folks think electrical contractors CAN and CAN'T do.

The interviewees are remodelers, of course. The article is "Keeping Up With Home Technology: Outsourcing Allows Remodelers to Manage Homeowners' Needs."

Note that the thing runs 5,000 words!!!

From the piece:

Q: Do either one of you have or look at an electrical contractor who will do high voltage and low voltage both? Have you seen combinations and stayed away from them, David?

David: Yes. We've seen combinations and yes, we do have electricians who will, on a limited basis, handle elements of this. The only other element beside the electrical would be specific to lighting control. Beyond that, there is nothing else that they would handle or that we would expect them to include, for the exact reasons Harry mentioned. It's too speciali

We've run into exactly the same situation and we've done exactly the same thing. What is it to run seven speaker wires in a 700 square foot home theater area for the homeowner's Lifestream television 7.1 system surround-sound only to come and find out that the people they bought the speakers from for in-wall and ceiling installation say, "No, we should have had this or that." We'd never get big enough to want to do it. We wouldn't allow the electrician to get involved beyond the lighting. In some cases, all the client is really looking for is the lighting control.

Apparently, the idea is that ECs can't do some of the technology installations. "We wouldn't allow the electrician to get involved beyond the lighting" is an interesting concept. On the one hand, as a big fan of the electrical contractor (look at the URL on this site!) . . . I'm integrally opposed to the idea that a contractor and his professional electricians can't handle any part of the low-voltage work.

On the other hand: At least this remodeler gives the lighting piece of a home technology installation to the electrical contractor! Increasingly, in home tech work, the EC is being aced out.

18 Feb, 2008

Bottom Falls Out Of Market

Posted by jsalimando 11:28 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Current Data
Folks keep looking for "the bottom" of the housing market. They might well be looking deep into 2009 . . . or later. From a story from the 2/13 San Diego newspaper:

San Diego County median home prices fell last month to their lowest level in four years with nearly half of existing homes selling at a loss in the face of mounting foreclosures, DataQuick Information Systems reported yesterday.

You can go to the newspaper (click on the colored type) -- or just study this graphic:



18 Feb, 2008

Green Collar Jobs

Posted by jsalimando 11:18 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Intelligent Buildings
Here's another perspective on "green collar jobs" -- from a greenie, Jerry Yudelson:

. . . remember one truth of economics; if I rob Peter to pay Paul, I haven’t gained any economic benefit or created any new jobs. I’ve just transferred the jobs from Peter’s company to Paul’s. If I take tax revenues and utility payments to subsidize one form of green technology, there’s less money left over for other investments. It’s only if these investments result in greater productivity do I gain any new jobs.

Common sense wins -- all the time. BUT: Sometimes it takes a while for the final hand to be dealt. Here, Yudelson is jumping the gun. Bully for him!

18 Feb, 2008

Ugly Deficit Graphic

Posted by jsalimando 11:09 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Current Data
I found this on Industry Week's website. It's freaking UGLY. The article that the link in the magazine's name will take you to is NOT about the petroleum problem. But yet . . . we clearly have a problem, don't we?



18 Feb, 2008

TV Ads - IBEW Maine

Posted by jsalimando 11:07 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Audio & Video
A NECA-IBEW local Labor-Management Cooperation Committee in Maine has produced two long TV commercials. Each is 2:15 (two minutes and 15 seconds) long. Click on the colored link and you'll go to a page with links to the two spots.

18 Feb, 2008

Products - NAHB Show

Posted by jsalimando 11:02 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Scene + Herd
Two product reviews from Nation's Building News -- about products at the NAHB show:

Progress Lighting

Eaton Electrical/Cutler-Hammer

17 Feb, 2008

Green Standard from NAHB

Posted by jsalimando 03:38 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Intelligent Buildings
Separate from its Green program, NAHB has been assembling interesting parties -- under the voluntary ANSI standards-making process -- and creating a Green home building standard. You'll find info on this here. The standard is not yet complete.

From my listening to the press event and other discussion of this, the standard-creation effort seems laudable. The idea is to have something better than the Guideline (see immediately previous post for a link). The further idea is to put in place something that municipalities (towns, cities, counties, and even states) can adopt as their requirements.

Apparently, more than 150 local governments have put some sort of green homebuilding regulations in place. Many seem to have used the LEED guidelines from USGBC . . . some of them adapting LEED-NC (which is about commercial buildings, I think) for homes. This led to the NAHB effort on the standard.

However, NAHB didn't rush into this. By choosing to use the ANSI process -- which is painstaking -- NAHB went about this "the right way." Supposedly, the standard will be finalized in Q2 (which means by June 30th).

Apparently, NAHB had 1,300 comments when it released a first draft of the standard, months ago. More recently, it took in 600 comments on the 2nd draft (roughly half of which came from the 42-member committee, which -- under the ANSI-specified process -- includes representatives of various concerned parties, including the public). Under the ANSI process, the committee has to take up each comment (ONE AT A TIME) . . . read it, think about it, and officially "react" to it.

As I noted -- laudable.

- - - - -

EleBlog side note: I try not to be morbid; being of Sicilian descent can lead to that, I've learned in 54 years on this planet. But during the press conference on the standard, I had a twinge of regret -- I am truly sorry that Brooke Stauffer, the former NECA executive (and friend of mine) is dead. I could really have used his input on whether the standard itself has value, and how well the NAHB people followed the ANSI process (in which he was expert). I'm sorry to interject this here . . . it isn't in my notes . . . but this is precisely the kind of thing with which one (me!) could rely on the intelligence of Brooke Stauffer.



17 Feb, 2008

NAHB's Green Program

Posted by jsalimando 03:26 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Scene + Herd
Home builders have, apparently, been pushing NAHB to get some kind of Green House certification program. NAHB has been working on this!

-- in May, NAHB will have its 10th annual Green Building Conference. That's laudable, isn't it?

-- 3 years ago, NAHB put together Green Building guidelines. The online document -- a 186-page PDF -- carries a 2006 copyright. Click here to download all 186 pages.

-- now, NAHB has put a certification program -- featuring, most importantly, 3rd-party verifiers -- in place. There's a website to go with this, of course -- www.nahbgreen.org.

I sat through a press event on this. Here are some thoughts:

1. The program has some mandatory things (like energy-efficiency requirements), but it's flexible and adaptable. This is either good or bad. The builder and homeowner can work together to spec out a house that scores HIGH or non-high on the NAHB's green building program rankings.

My fear: It's very damn complicated. Some of the options will probably be free, and some low-cost; some will come at a high cost. Which is which? You won't find that on the NAHB site or in the program -- it would be against federal law for NAHB to "set" prices. So the devil really IS in the details here. Each builder will have his/her/its own price for each option.

I envision a nightmare.

2. The 3rd-party verifiers need to be trained and certified by the NAHB Research Center. I think this part of the program is very good. There might be a short-term chicken-and-egg problem here -- not enough verifiers until there's demand, blahblahblah. But this is the right thing.

3. Bob Jones, an NAHB veep (a homebuilder elected to the national leadership), led the press conference. I was most impressed with one thing he said: Sooner or later, there won't be any Green anything. Green building is going to be mainstream. No one will need to request an environmentally suitable home -- this stuff will be a standard offering of home builders.

The specific comment was that most builders no longer say they "build to code." Of course they build to the code. If you said you were building to code, it would sound (these days) as if you were doing the absolute minimum.

4. NAHB didn't think everything through in preparing for this press conference. There is a pre-existing green standard out there -- the LEED-H program from the U.S. Green Building Council. Many questions from the assembled media (in fact, it might have been most) were focused on trying to differentiate the new NAHB Green Program from LEED-H.

NAHB appeared unprepared for this. It wasn't ugly, but it was confusing as heck.

5. Finally, I looked (in vain) for the info on the bottom of the press release on these green things for the words "printed on recycled paper." It wouldn't have been impossible (or very expensive) to arrange to do this for this event!!!




17 Feb, 2008

Green Thoughts from NAHB

Posted by jsalimando 03:18 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Scene + Herd
NAHB had two significant announcements about things GREEN at its annual convention:

a. The new GREEN program.

b. Progress report on the NAHB's GREEN standard, which was more interesting than I had originally thought.



NAHB staffers and top elected officials worse Green T-shirts on 2/14, Green Day -- and some of them sported these badges, too.



I'm going to get into the Program and the Standard in the next 2 posts. However, right here I'd like to comment on Green Day.

- - - - -

EleBlog Take:

If you're going to go green, be sincere. Do some things that are good for the environment. I thought NAHB botched this in a big way. I'm sorry to be critical, but some stuff is easy to do -- and it doesn't necessarily fall into the category of Missionary Work. Among the things overlooked, in my opinion -- the simple things -- were:

a. The Orlando CC had containers for the recycling of cans and bottles all over the place. But there was no place to recycle PAPER. And as with any convention and trade show, this one featured One Heck of a Lot of Paper. I thought this was a major oversight.

b. Back in the 1980s, when I was in the waste industry, I went to conferences at which the sponsors asked you to deposit your badge holders in a barrel on your way out of the event. This isn't a new idea. Yet the NAHB did not ask anyone to do this. The big thing here is that you get a 3-fer-1 when you do this:

-- you keep plastics out of the waste stream.

-- NAHB, which holds numerous events, could have re-used the badges (re-use is better, even, than recycling!).

-- you involve each and every attendee in a personal (if extremely minor) effort to be Green.

c. Finally, while I didn't attend all of the remodeling events, I didn't see anything on the program -- nor hear anything in the sessions -- about the recycling of fluorescent lamps (including CFLs). The CFLs -- when thrown in the trash -- are hazardous waste (because of the mercury within them). If you want to present yourself as GREEN, you might at least mention that people (including remodelers) should do the right thing with this stuff! I heard several people (speaking at various sessions) talk about using CFLs, but no one mentioned the care needed in getting rid of them.

17 Feb, 2008

Housing Forecast - Slipping

Posted by jsalimando 02:50 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Current Data
In a post here on 2/15, I noted (in "Things Get Scarier") that one of the things that scared me was the decline in the forecast from David Seiders, the chief economist at NAHB (for 20+ years). I've seen Seiders in action, he has integrity, he's been very accurate in the future. Before he came to NAHB, he worked (for 18 years, I think) as a staffer at the Federal Reserve Board.

I had to wait until I got home to dig up his previous forecasts. Here's a quick index to revisions made by Seiders in the past FEW months:

2008 Single-Family Housing Starts

10/30/07 931,000

1/24/08 781,000

2/6/08 769,000

NOTES:

a. This is a 17.4% drop in Seiders' forecast in 14 weeks.

b. Single-family starts in 2005 were 1,719,000 and in 2007 were 1,040,000.

c. The forecast decline from LAST YEAR is 26%


2008 New Single-Family Home Sales

This is actual sales of newly constructed homes by home builders (as opposed to sales of existing homes).

10/30/07 781,000

1/24/08 671,000

2/6/08 632,000

a. Single-family home sales in 2006 were 1,049,000. They peaked in '05 at 1,279,000.

b. If the '08 forecast proves accurate, the drop from the peak -- just three years earlier -- will be 50%.

c. The change in Seiders' forecast from Oct. 30 to Feb. 6 is -23.6%.

- - - - -

INFO ONLINE

Seiders' presentation -- and those of two guest economists -- are here. Unfortunately, the Seiders PDF omits the most important page of the damn thing -- the data page. I have that only because I was in the room and got the full handout. By the way, one of the other 2 speakers -- David Berson -- was actually MORE negative than Seiders!

ALSO: NAHB's economics dept. posted three other presentations for download -- on consumer preferences, the multifamily outlook, and remodeling. You can download PDFs of those here.

- - - - -

EleBlog Take:

It's a bit scary when a guy with integrity, who has worked in the home building market as an economist for two decades, revises his forecast -- downward -- and BIG downward -- in a 3 1/2-month time period. The reaction here (from me) is . . . Look Out Below!




17 Feb, 2008

NAHB Convention Coverage

Posted by jsalimando 02:40 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Scene + Herd
I went to Orlando earlier this week to cover the National Association of Home Builders annual gathering. There were several reasons I wanted to go to this thing -- it's an event I normally do not attend.

1 -- I wanted to see, with my own eyes, what the "buzz" was in the housing market.

2 -- NAHB set Feb. 14 (Valentine's Day) as it's "Green Day." I wanted to sit in on some of those events.

3 -- There were 2 shows in Orlando on housing in Feb-Mar -- this one and Electronic House Expo in March. As both were going to on my ticket (i.e., no client would pay my way to either) -- I allowed myself ONE, but not both. Money matters!

So I showed up. There will be a few blogs after this one on what I saw and heard. If you want to get more on NAHB from the source, here are other places you can go:

HANDOUTS from seminars -- some had 'em, and some didn't. Some were good, some were inexplicable if you weren't there. You can download handouts from seminars (in PDF) from http://www.buildershow.com/Events/EducationalSeminars.aspx

You'll have to figure out how to use the seminar selector. There's a box you can check (before you search) that says "show only seminars iwth handouts." You can pick by topic.

PRESS RELEASES -- NAHB offers a bunch of 'em, here.


15 Feb, 2008

Things Get Scarier

Posted by jsalimando 01:16 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Economic Thoughts
Three telling indicators:

  1. From the 2/14 Wall Street Journal --

The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey's interest rate jumped Tuesday to 20% from about 4.2% when bidders didn't show up at an auction of its securities by Goldman Sachs Group Inc. For the next week at least -- until the rate is reset again in the next auction -- the Port Authority, which oversees New York-area transportation facilities such as bridges and tunnels, will have to pay close to $390,000 in interest payments to holders of the securities. That is up from $83,611 the week before, said a Port Authority spokesman.

I've since seen another story indicating that this auction-market problem is worsening.


  1. CMBS Issuance in January = Zero

January appears to be the first month without issuance under the current market format, or since the Resolution Trust Corp stopped issuing CMBS in 1995, he said.

http://blog.retailtrafficmag.com/retail_traffic_court/2008/01/30/cmbs-issuance-for-january-000/

Note: CMBS = commercial mortgage-backed securities.

I'm a regular reader of Retail Traffic magazine's electronic offerings. From my reading of the commercial Real estate market, this is scaring the crap out of some people. It should, right?


  1. Single-Family Housing starts -- Drop of 55% from Peak to (Latest Forecast) Bottom....(????)

2004 actual: 1,604,000

2005 actual: 1,719,000

2006 actual: 1,474,000

2007 estimated: 1,040,000

2008 forecast: 769,000

Data – including estimate + forecast – from Natl. Assn. of Home Builders. Updated per David Seiders (chief economist) handout at press conference 2/13/08 in Orlando at NAHB annual convention.

I would guess the 2007 estimate is pretty good. The forecast for this year calls for a 26% drop. If Seiders' forecast is correct, the drop from peak (2005) to anticipated trough is 55%.

 (More)

15 Feb, 2008

Wireless Lighting Control

Posted by jsalimando 01:13 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Lighting
I inadvertently found this on SpaceDaily.com:

WiseLight automatically enables commercial and government municipal users to save energy and costs. This green energy saving system automates scheduling, monitoring and control of outdoor lighting applications such as recreational fields, parking lots, billboards and other venues.

The WiseLight system eliminates timer and photosensor inefficiencies and malfunctions and allows direct feedback to identify failed components, such as bulbs and fixtures, and initiates real-time customer-defined notifications for prompt repair.

The WiseLight hardware is installed between a lighting fixture and its power supply and operates lights only when needed or desired. The centralized command and control feature of the system enables users to monitor energy usage and control a single lamp or any combination of lamps via machine-to-machine wireless communications from a secure internet web site.

It's from a company called Kelly Space and Technology(!).




15 Feb, 2008

Prevailing Wage Lawsuit

Posted by jsalimando 01:09 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Scene + Herd
From a 12/20/07 article in the Pioneer Press (a newspaper in Minneapolis-St. Paul):

In the first lawsuit of its kind, three construction workers are suing an electrical contractor for back wages and more under Minnesota's prevailing wage law, which dictates the hourly rate of pay for workers on state-funded projects. The workers claim they were not paid what they were owed.

The lawsuit against Cole's Electric in Owatonna names three plaintiffs, electricians Kyle Krienke, Cory Martinson and Jeremiah Johnson. The three did electrical work for Cole's and are seeking double the wages they claim were withheld and to compel the employer to comply fully with the law. Martinson is still employed by Cole's; the other two no longer work there.

15 Feb, 2008

DCs Future: Grim?

Posted by jsalimando 01:01 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Data Centers
"Gartner Paints Grim Picture of Data Centers' Future" says the headline from GreenerComputing.com. Bad news for some can be good news for others. This particular bad news -- which is about Watts Per Square Foot -- sounds good for electrical contractors!

"At least 70% of the world's Global 1000 organizations will have to adapt their data centers during the next five years, especially those in the U.S., which has the highest concentration of data centers larger than 50,000 sq. ft. and older than seven years," the article says.

A quote from Rakesh Kumar of Gartner: "These legacy data centers were built to a design specification of about 100 to 150 watts per sq. ft. Current design needs are about 300 to 400 watts/sq. ft., and by 2011, this could rise to more than 600."

15 Feb, 2008

Hackers Cut Power

Posted by jsalimando 00:58 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Off The Pathen Beat
You might have seen this story in mid-January. A CIA speaker said -- out loud, at a public conference -- that "criminals have been able to hack into computer systems . . . and cut power to several cities."

15 Feb, 2008

Paint-On Solar Cells

Posted by jsalimando 00:54 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Intelligent Buildings
I'm only 7 months behind on this one, but I found (via Construction.com) a TreeHugger post that includes this quote from a researcher:

"Someday homeowners will even be able to print sheets of these solar cells with inexpensive home-based inkjet printers. Consumers can then slap the finished product on a wall, roof or billboard to create their own power stations."

Here's the original release (from the New Jersey Institute of Technology).



15 Feb, 2008

Calculating Fault Currents

Posted by jsalimando 00:50 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Scene + Herd
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine's Jan issue included Part 15 in a series on "the art of protecting electrical systems" -- on calculating fault currents. The article included a bunch of (not-so-well-presented) tables -- "tables that indicate the fault current available at the end of various feeders, and which calculate fault current at the ends of feeders of various size and length."

While the tables aren't that easy to read, you could no doubt upsize them and make them readable. The article printed out at 9 pages on my printer, of which 7 consisted solely of tables!

11 Feb, 2008

New Trend: True Worries

Posted by jsalimando 12:47 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Economic Thoughts
According to wikipedia, the 5 steps in the Kubler-Ross model of the way that people deal with tragedy are:
  1. Denial: The initial stage: "It can't be happening."
  2. Anger: "Why me? It's not fair."
  3. Bargaining: "Just let me live to see my children graduate."
  4. Depression: "I'm so sad, why bother with anything?"
  5. Acceptance: "It's going to be OK.
I've detected a new trend in the past week on the economic front: We're moving out of Denial. Here's some of evidence (I've limited myself here):

A. An article in the Houston Chronicle on experts pronouncing on the housing market. One of the two experts quoted is Robert Shiller -- a hero of mine. He's the guy who called the stock market insanely overvalued in 1999, just before the bubble popped. The article isn't that long, but you might not make it to the real gold . . . these two paragraphs from the very end of the thing:

Conversations with world leaders at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, last month convinced Shiller that officials are more worried about the subprime fallout than they are letting on.

"In face-to-face conversations, they were expressing a lot more doubts than you were seeing in the newspapers," Shiller said. "I think it's instinctive for many people to want to show confidence, but I heard a lot of worries."

B. Every week, I read Doug Nolan's Credit Bubble Bulletin. Every week, without fail -- it's a weekend ritual. It a very long FREE Internet posting, consisting of news items Noland has clipped during the week -- ones that he thinks are particularly revealing. What follows that is analysis from Noland.

The column is new every week, and if you are reading this BEFORE 2/15, this link will take you to the latest column (not the one to which I am referring). Instead, if you're late -- go to the Archive and look for the first coluimn posted in February.

Noland has NOT been in denial. But this week's final paragraph was, to me -- as a regular reader (going back to 2000!) -- particularly revealing. I've highlighted the words that set off an atomic bomb in my brain, but you might do well to read the whole damn thing (by following one of the links). Note that I've divided the final paragraph a bit (to help readability) and that the boldfacing below is MINE.

Going forward, I expect a foundering leveraged speculating community to be At The Heart of Deepening Monetary Disorder. The initial victims appear the fragile global equities market Bubbles and the U.S. Corporate Credit market. Forced deleveraging of hedge fund corporate debt and derivatives is in the process of creating a massive overhang of securities to sell, in the process profoundly curtailing Credit Availability and Marketplace Liquidity throughout.

The ramifications for our finance-based Bubble Economy are momentous.

As an economic and financial analyst (as opposed to “fear-monger”), I feel it is imperative to highlight that it is more “technically” accurate to categorize the unfolding scenario in the historical context of an economic “depression” rather than “recession. This is certainly not shaping up as a short-term inventory-led economic adjustment or “mid-cycle” slowdown.

Instead, we have now entered the very initial stages of what will likely prove a deep, prolonged and arduous adjustment to the underlying structure of our Credit and economic systems.


 (More)

11 Feb, 2008

08 Buildings Outlook

Posted by jsalimando 12:35 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Reports + Summaries
Buildings magazine has posted a 4 ,100-word forecast-- with pieces from various industry experts -- covering education, hotels, multifamily housing, healthcare, industrial, retail, and (of course!) office buildings.

EleBlog take: I'm pretty sure ALL forecasts are going to be OFF this year, as things are changing . . . rapidly. But this is no doubt still worth a read.

11 Feb, 2008

Home Technology Alliance

Posted by jsalimando 12:29 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Reports + Summaries
This is an NAHB deal, as 'splained here:

The Home Technology Alliance (HTA) is a partnership between NAHB and the Custom Electronic Design Installation Association (CEDIA) that was formed to position the housing industry to effectively meet the growing homebuyer demand for home technology and provide the maximum return on investment in the new home building and remodeling process.

On NAHB's small site for the HTA, I found a 39-page PDF -- a report on research into how NAHB members see the Electronic Systems Contractor.

I've scanned the thing (not yet made it through) -- seems interesting.

You might also check out NAHB's HTA home page.

11 Feb, 2008

PreFab House - Green

Posted by jsalimando 12:25 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Pre-Fab + etc.
Check out this (old) blog entry on Treehugger -- about a pre-fab house. 12+ pix!

11 Feb, 2008

China - Power User of Power

Posted by jsalimando 12:20 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Off The Pathen Beat
From the 2/5 Wall Street Journal:

"Gu Junyuan, chief engineer of the electricity commission, said total demand for electricity in China increased 20.2% annually between 2001 and 2007. Installed capacity, on the othe hand, grew by about 18.5% a year over the period."

Whew!

Anything that grows at 20% a year doubles in 3.6 years.

Does that mean electricity demand in Red China will have about quadrupled between the beginning of 2000 and the end of 2008?

Wow!

10 Feb, 2008

Improving The Building Experience

Posted by jsalimando 04:12 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Intelligent Buildings
John Greenwell of Continental Electric's CEPORT LLC has penned an article for Automated Buildings on Realigning Where People, Space, Time & Energy Interact. Here's a graphic from the thing:




. . . it's a short, interesting read.

10 Feb, 2008

EC Reaches 100th Anniversary

Posted by jsalimando 04:08 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Scene + Herd
Kelso-Burnett, a Chicago area electrical contractor (and more), is this year celebrating its 100th anniversary. See the release here and the company timeline.

10 Feb, 2008

Carbon Capture Baloney -- II

Posted by jsalimando 04:03 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Scene + Herd
Back in August, I posted a short rant here on Carbon Capture & Sequestration. I had initially been cheered by the idea that this technology would make the use of coal -- of which we have so damn much -- more environmentally acceptable. But (as you'll see here) -- I felt betrayed when I discovered the truth.

That truth: The cost of CCS was OUT OF SIGHT. There was no prospect for the thing to succeed; there's not that much money in the world.

Now, a 2/1 news item on ClimateBiz.com says the the U.S. DoE is scrapping plans for "the world's largest clean-coal power plant and carbon sequestration facility." Why? "The costs had doubled since it was originalliy conceived."

10 Feb, 2008

Connectors Cut Install Time

Posted by jsalimando 04:01 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Labor + Time Savers
This is NOT an endorsement of the product, but the headline -- which says this item offers a reduction in installation time -- caught my eye.

By redesigning its time-saving Liquidtight ST Series of cable and conduit connectors, Appleton is aggressively targeting OEM and harsh industrial applications that require electrical connections be protected from water, dust, oil, grease, fumes and other hostile contaminants.

Now available pre-assembled with an integrated KO sealing ring, the connectors are up to 25% faster to install than competitors' connectors.

10 Feb, 2008

Tips For Techs

Posted by jsalimando 03:58 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Audio & Video
Black Box Network Services, which is a cabling contractor, said on 2/7 that it had launched "a new series of 'how-to' video tutorials" in video.

10 Feb, 2008

Green REIT

Posted by jsalimando 03:56 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Intelligent Buildings
REIT = Real Estate Investment Trust. Accoridng to GreenerBuildings.com, there's a new one out there -- "one that hopes to make it easier to bring big money to green building retrofit projects."

10 Feb, 2008

Modular Electrified Wall Panel

Posted by jsalimando 03:52 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Pre-Fab + etc.
I don't normally spend a lot of time on inventions and patents -- and thanks to the Internet, you COULD. But I stumbled across this one recently via my subscription to Nexis, and it seemed interesting.

Headline: "Indiana Inventors Develop Modular Furniture Environment Electrified Wall Panel."

Abstract:

An electrified wall panel in a modular furniture environment includes a plurality of multi-port electrical distribution blocks diversely located throughout the panel. Certain ones of the multi-port electrical distribution blocks are fixed to wall panel frame members and other ones of the multi-port electrical distribution blocks are free of the wall panel.

A plurality of jumper cables, each having connectors at opposite cable ends are adapted to mate with any one of the multi-port electrical distribution block ports. The cables electrically interconnect the distribution blocks to form one complete circuit. There are a plurality of electrical receptacles, each having an electrical connector near one end which are electrically coupled to a port of a corresponding multi-port electrical distribution block.

The system is assembled by fixing a jumper mounting bracket to a jumper cable near one end of the jumper cable. The jumper mounting bracket is attached to a support member. A modular electrical component such as an electrical receptacle is electrically connected to the power distribution block and is mechanically connected to the jumper mounting bracket thereby stabilizing the power distribution system on the support member.

There's a lot more at the page to which the link above takes you.

07 Feb, 2008

'Kill A Watt' Product Line

Posted by jsalimando 00:34 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Scene + Herd
I've bought stuff from Edmund Scientific in the past, and I'm on the company's e-mail list. Recently, the promotion was on the Kill-A-Watt EZ. Here's what the e-mail said (the content below might be more interesting than the product!) --

Electricity bills are rising. Now you can cut down on costs and find out what appliances are actually worth keeping plugged in. Simply connect these appliances to the Kill A Watt EZ™, and it will assess how efficient they really are. Large LCD display will count consumption by the Kill-o-watt hour, same as your local utility. You can calculate your electrical expenses by the day, week, month, even an entire year!

The Energy Information Administration found Americans use 60% more electricity today than they did 20 years ago. Some examples of the amount of energy you use and how much it costs you are in the following examples:

  • iPod Docking Station – Uses three watts charging and five when it's playing music. This costs you a penny a day!
  • Big Screen TV – When the TV is on it can use 210 watts, when off 64. It costs you 11 cents a day just have the TV plugged in at your house!
  • Game Systems – Can use 2 watts when the system is off but uses 145 when it's on. This costs you about one penny an hour!
  • Digital Video Recorder – This can pull 83 watts all day long. That means just having one of these plugged in the wall in your home can cost you 15 cents a day!
Note: I don't make any money if you order the thing! I'm not selling it -- I just thought the promotion was worth a read.

07 Feb, 2008

Remote Monitoring: Meters & Breakers

Posted by jsalimando 00:29 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Scene + Herd
Remote Monitoring Closes The Gap Between Meters and Breakers, says a headline in the 1/15 Plant Engineering magazine. It's a staff-written 1,822-word piece, and it's about 21st-century electrical state-of-the-art (I think). A relevant slice:

Remote monitoring extends beyond low-voltage switchgear to MCCs, circuit breakers, feeders, tie breakers, transformers, busway, panelboards – anything in the plant’s electrical distribution system. “All electrical equipment can be monitored,” said Jane Barber, product manager, GE Consumer & Industrial. “It’s a matter of having sensors fed to devices monitoring the necessary parameters. Each type of equipment has sensors and devices suited specifically to the application facilitating remote communication.”

Barber said sensors for current and voltage provide the basic input to devices used for protection and/or metering and monitoring, as well as status of the power system. Intelligent remote monitoring and power management systems use voltage, current, status and temperature to derive hundreds of useful parameters to help plant managers stay on top of what their electrical systems are doing.

“There are various levels of monitoring,” Barber noted. “There is the basic monitoring of current, voltage and possibly other conditions such as temperature. Another level of sophistication is the ability to monitor and report the actions of protective devices. Consequently, this level requires more intelligence at the protective device level.”



07 Feb, 2008

Prefab, Modular + Green

Posted by jsalimando 00:20 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Pre-Fab + etc.
I've detected a noteworthy "leaning" among the green/green construction people toward modular construction and prefabrication. I've seen a lot of it, but I've not collected a link library; I'll get around to that.

For now, take a look at this 572-word posting on GreenOptions.com on Prefabrication and Modularity. Here's what the writer says, on the most basic level:

When you think of modular furniture, it doesn’t seem very sturdy, huh? But in fact, many of us have all used it- you buy a put-it-together-yourself desk, bring it home in a flat box, and construct it in the intended room. Just think about how many more desks can be shipped in one truckload in their deconstructed, flat form. Lots more! This cuts shipping costs, emissions, total embodied energy…

Prefab homes are constructed in a similar way, just on a larger scale.

And

Why choose prefab? Here is the skinny on the prefab eco accomplishments. Since the modules are constructed in a factory, a higher quality construction can be ensured than on site stick-built homes. The fasteners are accurately applied, materials are cut with more exactness, and since they have to withstand transport, everything is tighter and more secure. This extends the lifespan and cuts the upkeep.

Modular prefabrication also saves significant amounts on their waste. While 30-40% of the material from a standard home construction site is carted off to the dump, modular homes generate only about 2% waste. That is a pretty large gap. Additionally, since the duration of construction is shorter, the cost is lower!

07 Feb, 2008

Construction Spending, 2007

Posted by jsalimando 00:14 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Current Data
Prelim numbers on 2007 construction spending were emitted last Friday by the Census Bureau. The bottom line: Unadjusted spending on "construction put in place" during 2007 is estimated at $1.16 trillion -- down 2.6% from 2006.

Now consider that the inflation rate is running at 4%, 5%, or 6% (real inflation in the real economy). I tend to lean toward the higher number, so for EleBlog purposes, construction last year was actually down 8% or more.

Private residential construction was down in 2007 by 18.3%. By a frickin' weird coincidence, private nonresidential construction was up 18.3%. While it's the same percentage, it's not the same number -- residential (at $524.15 billion) was a lot bigger than nonres ($349.82 billion).

EleBlog Note: I am right now gathering info for an article about what's happening in the commercial real estate (and construction) markets. It's not good.

07 Feb, 2008

Global Warming + Energy Efficiency

Posted by jsalimando 00:11 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Scene + Herd
TEDMAG.com has recently posted two Salimando columns, somewhat related, on these topics:

Global Warming & Your Business -- a look at GW from the perspective of electrical distributors.

EcoBuild Fall & A Sense Of Urgency -- thoughts upon attending conference sessions and walking the EcoBuild Fall trade show in Washington, D.C.

07 Feb, 2008

CFL Brouhaha: Vox Populi

Posted by jsalimando 00:02 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Lighting
On Jan. 2, The Wall Street Journal ran an article on CFLs. In the Sat-Sun (Jan. 12-13) edition of the WSJ, eight letters to the editor printed in reaction to the piece:

1 -- "I . . . gave thanks that Congress has the time and wisdom to help with the plumbing and lighting of my house."

2 -- "Even if one posits that the current furor over global warming is more hype than reality, replacing incandescents with CFLs still makes good sense."

3 -- "Our community has a progressive recycling program, but due to lack of funding, mercury and other hazardous items can be accepted only twice a year. Are we so naive to think that consumers will dispose of these bulbs appropriately? Instead, will they be put in household garbage . . . do we really have to use this technology?"

4 -- "These new bulbs also have that 60-cycle 'flicker' that can be debilitating to those who have vision defects . . . "

5 -- On lighting the interior of a refrigerator: "Where is the good to the environment if we have to stand there, fridge door open, while we wait for a CFL to illuminate?"

6 -- "In a small way, the eventual ban of the incandescent light bulb is another exaqmple of 'degrees of non-freedom' imposed upon the members of a democratic society."

7 -- "Especially in northern latitudes with summertime daylight until 9 p.m. or so, residential lighting is largely during the heating season. The extra heat from incandescent bulbs thus displays primary space heating . . . Much of the additional electricity for lighting is during off-peak and shoulder hours."

8 -- "Consumers aren't so smart when it comes to the environment."

As The EleBlog has its own opinions on CFLs -- and they've been expressed here (use the search feature!) -- it was interesting to read a smattering of viewpoints from folks who have the $ and time to read the WSJ. According to Wikipedia, the newspaper in 2006 had a worldwide paid print circulation of 2 million, with 931,000 online subscribers.

06 Feb, 2008

China: 'Quality Fade'

Posted by jsalimando 23:52 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Recent Reading
Knowledge@Wharton is a free public information service from the Wharton School at the U. of Penn. You have to register to see what's there. Back in July, the site posted 'Quality Fade': China's Great Business Challenge -- yes, back in July. I'm still getting caught up on my reading. The opinion piece comes from Paul Midler of China Advantage.

Here's an eye-opening section:

One of the problems facing China is that manufacturers continue to engage in a practice I call "quality fade." This is the deliberate and secret habit of widening profit margins through a reduction in the quality of materials. Importers usually never notice what's happening; downward changes are subtle but progressive. The initial production sample is fine, but with each successive production run, a bit more of the necessary inputs are missing.

What is maddening to importers is that quality fade often occurs in the last place an importer thinks to check. One American company had been importing a line of health and beauty care products for over a year when the cardboard boxes that held its product suddenly started collapsing under their own weight. There was no logical explanation for the collapse except quality fade, and the supplier in this case blamed sub-suppliers for replacing an acceptable cardboard box with ones that were inferior.



04 Feb, 2008

101 Years of Copper Prices

Posted by jsalimando 10:02 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Recent Reading
I'm reading a book about The Panic of 1907. There actually WAS a market panic in 1907 -- a huge one. It was one of a series of panics in U.S. and global markets over a 100-year period.

In 1907, according to what I've read and heard, things only settled down when J.P. Morgan (and his friends) stepped in. The earth shook. People in power freaked out. They discovered, in this panic, that the world relied for its economic stability on the good will of a small group of powerful men.

Here's a link to the book on Amazon.com (note that I am NOT associated with that site in any way).

The point: My reading in the book is where it gets into copper (for reasons not directly associated with electricity). I read last night that the price of copper fell from 24 cents a pound to 18 cents at one point in 1907.

Thus, I now know the price of copper in 1907. I'm using 24 cents. I used the BLS inflation calculator to do some math. Here's what I did:

a. I set the price at the further-back year on the BLS calculator -- 1913 -- to 24 cents.

b. I hit submit.

c. I got back the inflation-adjusted value in 2007 of 24 cents in 1913.

It's $5.03.

That means that copper, even at today's $3.27/pound -- even at the $4.00 pound it came close to hitting in May 2006 -- was still, on an inflation-adjusted basis, nowhere near the 1907 price.

[If I set the 1913 price to 18 cents, it would come out to $3.77 in 2007's money.]

EleBlog take: TWO POINTS

1. A 100-year investment in copper got one NOWHERE. So much for the buy-and-hold theory, eh? Obviously, it does not apply to commodities. The time to buy copper (in perfect hindsight) was 2001, when the price was 65 cents. At today's $3.27, you'd be holding onto a 5-bagger right now.

2. A side note: The crash and panic of 1907 led to the formation of the Federal Reserve Board. I have often read about this; I bought the book so I could "read up" on the specifics. What I've read (in snippets in various articles) in the past was:

-- Morgan bailed out the world in 1907.

-- People in economic and politics circles started to think about this. Their thought was:

. . . what if there is no person like J.P. Morgan around next time?

. . . what if we can't find J.P. Morgan, or a person like him, the next time? Worldwide communication was still horrible back then.

. . . what if J.P. Morgan, or the next person like him, wants to extract a price next time (as in, I'll save the world if you make me King).

-- As a result, six years later, the U.S. government took its first-ever socialistic step . . . with the formation of the Fed. At least, that's how the story goes. Others (conspiracy theorists) say formation of the Fed actually just formalized the concentration of power (that in 1907 was unorganized and concentrated on just the one man).

Of course, I don't know any of #2 for a fact. I've just read references to it in short articles. That's why I'm reading the book!

FOR NOW, let's stick with this one concrete fact: If copper tops $5.03 per pound, it will be higher in 2008 (or whenever) that it was at the highs of 1907.


04 Feb, 2008

Holt In MD + VA - Next Week

Posted by jsalimando 08:08 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (1) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Site Stuff
My friend Mike Holt is speaking in the DC-MD-VA area twice next week, on Feb. 12 and Feb. 15. See the box at right. I believe one of the two events has sold out, so if you want to get in the door -- JUMP!

04 Feb, 2008

EC Employment '07 - Prelim

Posted by jsalimando 08:03 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Current Data
The Bureau of Labor Statistics projects subcontractor data one month AFTER it comes out with total-construction data. So there is nothing yet for Electrical Construction for 2008.

However, the BLS has firmed up 2007 data. Subject to a revision for December's figures, the annual average of production workers employed in electrical contracting last year was 731,100, up 3.37%. The 2007 average is the highest since 2001 (in which the industry averaged 759,400 workers -- 1,000 more than the previous high, which was in 2000).

Is this great news? It's hard to imagine hanging a drape over this. 10 years ago -- in 1998 -- the year's average was 647,600. And 1998 was NOT a bad year for the vast majority of electrical contractors!


04 Feb, 2008

Construction Employment - Update

Posted by jsalimando 07:48 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Current Data
For all of the residential job losses in 2007's construction industry, the government data (preliminary, subject to adjustment for December) show a loss of 34,000 on a base of 5,903,000 "production workers" in the construction industry -- the 2006 industry average. See the table below, which comes from the Bureau of Labor Statistics website -- it's a table created "on the fly" by a BLS employment stat database.

Note that I queried about the past seven years of employment of "production workers" in the construction industry. The data below are in thousands (which means you add 000 to each of the numers). So for January 2008, the figure is 5,360,000.

Yes, the change from 2006 to 2007 in the annual average is -- a big fat decline of 0.58%.

What happened, or -- what didn't happen?

a. The residential job losses fell significantly on illegal aliens. They weren't counted on the upside, and when they were jettisoned, they weren't counted as lost jobs (or unemployed people).

b. There were jobs created in the non-residential sector.

c. I believe the disease is spreading from residential to non-residential. But that is happening slowly.


Year

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

Ann

1998

4258

4255

4303

4606

4818

5002

5132

5169

5096

5115

5031

4896

4807

1999

4530

4584

4641

4933

5133

5321

5435

5441

5387

5388

5333

5132

5105

2000

4870

4825

4991

5164

5326

5498

5593

5604

5530

5523

5416

5204

5295

2001

4920

4921

5044

5199

5408

5567

5640

5625

5544

5513

5389

5214

5332

2002

4908

4883

4934

5066

5234

5392

5438

5447

5383

5349

5265

5055

5196

2003

4729

4661

4741

4946

5157

5326

5391

5421

5381

5354

5268

5095

5123

2004

4804

4761

4909

5121

5338

5508

5609

5629

5568

5599

5518

5340

5309

2005

5026

5039

5160

5432

5637

5821

5891

5944

5890

5919

5898

5679

5611

2006

5464

5484

5587

5792

5995

6139

6194

6236

6129

6081

5957

5778

5903

2007

5537

5409

5587

5739

5951

6142

6187

6167

6081

6050

5912

5668(p)

5869(p)

2008

5360(p)

ADDITIONAL NOTES:

d. Compare the annual average for 2007 with the annual average for 1998 -- or 2001. Construction had some mighty good years in 1998-2001. Employment is UP. Are contractors making more money? Are we THAT MUCH more inefficient? Has productivity fallen through the floor?

e. I believe the answer on Productivity is YES. Consider: Employment in construction was significantly higher than you see here in 2004-5-6. How do I know that? The BLS has admitted it. It says it didn't count the illegal aliens on the upside, and didn't count their job losses on the downside. THIS MEANS THESE ILLEGAL PEOPLE HAD JOBS IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY. Sorry to shout, but it's a big point.

f. Final note: Compare January 2008 (a preliminary number) with January 2007. There's a decline of 3.2% shown there -- the biggest year-over-year decline in some time. Tentative conclusion: Something is happening.


01 Feb, 2008

Electrical Foreman's Handbook

Posted by jsalimando 16:27 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Recent Reading
My friend Paul Rosenberg has brought his Electrical Foreman's Handbook back into print. It's worth a look -- and maybe a purchase.

01 Feb, 2008

Podcast: Homes For Troops

Posted by jsalimando 16:24 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Audio & Video
Engineering News-Record hosts a number of podcasts, I've recently discovered. I am not going to have time (and neither, probably, are you) to listen to all of 'em. But I thought it worth pointing out this one, which is from 3 months ago -- an interview iwth John Gonsalves, founder of "Homes for Our Troops." His program does just what you think it does -- buildings/remodels homes, adapting them for severely wounded veterans

[found thanks to www.buildingonline.com]

01 Feb, 2008

Nuclear's Water Crisis

Posted by jsalimando 16:18 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Scene + Herd
Here's a snippet quoted by Doug Noland (who writes the weekly Credit Bubble Bulletin):

January 23 – Associated Press (Mitch Weiss): “Nuclear reactors across the southeastern U.S. could be forced to throttle back or temporarily shut down later this year because drought is drying up the rivers and lakes that supply power plants with the huge amounts of cooling water they need to operate. Utility officials say such shutdowns probably wouldn’t result in blackouts. But they could lead to sharply higher electric bills for millions of Southerners…

'Water is the nuclear industry’s Achilles’ heel,’ said Jim Warren, executive director of N.C. Waste Awareness and Reduction Network… ‘You need a lot of water to operate nuclear plants.

"This is becoming a crisis.’”

01 Feb, 2008

Snow Causes Chaos (really!)

Posted by jsalimando 16:12 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Current Data
From a 1/23 Bloomberg.com item:

China has shut about 5% of its coal-fired power plants, forcing 13 provinces to ration electricity as snowfalls and transportation delays hamper deliveries of the fuel.

The five biggest electricity producers have shut 90 power stations with combined capacity exceeding 20,000 megawatts in northern and central China, figures today from the State Grid Corp. of China show. Coal stockpiles at the plants have dropped below the ``caution line'' of three days' requirements.

From a 1/29 Bloomber.com item:

PT Bumi Resources, Indonesia's largest coal exporter, said prices of the commodity may rise another 60 percent this year after quadrupling this decade. The company's stock rose to a record.

Prices of coal used by power stations may climb to between $125 a metric ton and $150 a ton this year, Dileep Srivastava, Bumi's head of investor relations, told reporters today after a shareholders' meeting. The company's sales rose as much as 24 percent to $2.3 billion last year, he said. Indonesia is the world's second-largest exporter of thermal coal.

Coal at Australia's Newcastle port, Asia's benchmark, has risen 80 percent the past 12 months and reached a record $93.70 in the week ended Jan. 25, according to McCloskey Group Ltd.

And from a 2/1 (today) item on Bloomberg.com:

Asian stocks rose, led by mining companies, after China's worst snowstorms in 50 years halted production and drove up prices of coal and zinc . . . BHP Billiton Ltd., the world's largest mining company, climbed and Korea Zinc Co. had its biggest gain in three years after the price of the metal surged the most in nine months.

"The transport bottlenecks in China may lead to a short- term spike in commodity prices and that will benefit some mining companies,'' said Mark Tan, who helps oversee $3 billion in Asian equities at UOB Asset Management in Singapore.

AND, from the same item:

China's benchmark CSI 300 has plunged 10 percent this week, its worst weekly performance since the measure was introduced in 2005.

Zhuzhou Smelter Group Co., China's largest zinc smelter, halted its main production plants Jan. 29 because of power cuts and snowstorms, the company said today. Zhuzhou has shut down all of its zinc and lead plants. China was a net exporter of zinc in 2007 and supplies a third of the world's lead.

BHP gained 4.1 percent to A$38.55 in Australia. Korea Zinc, the world's second-biggest zinc refiner, climbed 15 percent to 124,500 won in Seoul, the largest jump since October 2004. Toho Zinc Co., a Tokyo-based smelter, surged 14 percent to 535 yen, the steepest gain since January 2004.

. . . A measure of six metals traded on the London Metal Exchange, including copper and nickel, added 2.7 percent yesterday. Copper advanced 2.7 percent, nickel rose 0.6 percent, and zinc increased 7 percent, the most for nine months.


01 Feb, 2008

Employment Numbers: OFF

Posted by jsalimando 16:07 | Permalink Permalink | Comments comments (0) | Trackback Trackbacks (0) | Current Data
I took the graphic below from Barry Ritholtz's blog:



What is it? The right-hand-most column shows NFP % Error. NFP = Non-Farm Payroll. The employment increases reported (under the column "Original Release") were off by the HUGE numbers in the right-hand-most column. For the year 2007, then, employment was overstated by 191,000 over 12 months -- an overstatement of 14.38%. That's almost 16,000 per month. Find Barry's item here.